Suset Rodriguez, Kyara Marquez, Gemma St Louis, Arianna Vazquez, Leonardo Simonelli, Kara Lindsay, Janice Moscoso, George Roshdy Attia
{"title":"跨境生殖护理的发生率和妊娠结果:对试管婴儿受孕的回顾性评估。","authors":"Suset Rodriguez, Kyara Marquez, Gemma St Louis, Arianna Vazquez, Leonardo Simonelli, Kara Lindsay, Janice Moscoso, George Roshdy Attia","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03449-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of cross-border reproductive care (CBRC) and maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF), comparing outcomes between pregnancies conceived domestically and through CBRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on 4475 deliveries at a tertiary public hospital from February 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024. Maternal demographics, medical history, delivery outcomes, and complications were compared using statistical tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all deliveries, 95 were conceived via IVF. Among the IVF pregnancies, 23 (24.2%) were conceived through CBRC. While CBRC patients were older on average (40.3 vs. 37.8 years), this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). The incidence of hypertensive disorders was significantly higher in CBRC pregnancies compared to domestic IVF pregnancies (69.6% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.01). Trends toward increased rates of postpartum hemorrhage (17.4% vs. 5.8%) and multiple gestations (26.1% vs. 11.6%) were also observed in the CBRC group, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Neonatal outcomes, including rates of preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, and respiratory distress syndrome, were similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights a significantly higher percentage of hypertensive disorders among CBRC pregnancies, while other maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable to domestic IVF pregnancies. These findings underscore the need for further research with larger sample sizes and survey-based studies to better understand patient motivations and clinical risks associated with CBRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of cross-border reproductive care and pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective evaluation of IVF conceptions.\",\"authors\":\"Suset Rodriguez, Kyara Marquez, Gemma St Louis, Arianna Vazquez, Leonardo Simonelli, Kara Lindsay, Janice Moscoso, George Roshdy Attia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10815-025-03449-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of cross-border reproductive care (CBRC) and maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF), comparing outcomes between pregnancies conceived domestically and through CBRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on 4475 deliveries at a tertiary public hospital from February 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024. Maternal demographics, medical history, delivery outcomes, and complications were compared using statistical tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all deliveries, 95 were conceived via IVF. Among the IVF pregnancies, 23 (24.2%) were conceived through CBRC. While CBRC patients were older on average (40.3 vs. 37.8 years), this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). The incidence of hypertensive disorders was significantly higher in CBRC pregnancies compared to domestic IVF pregnancies (69.6% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.01). Trends toward increased rates of postpartum hemorrhage (17.4% vs. 5.8%) and multiple gestations (26.1% vs. 11.6%) were also observed in the CBRC group, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Neonatal outcomes, including rates of preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, and respiratory distress syndrome, were similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights a significantly higher percentage of hypertensive disorders among CBRC pregnancies, while other maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable to domestic IVF pregnancies. These findings underscore the need for further research with larger sample sizes and survey-based studies to better understand patient motivations and clinical risks associated with CBRC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03449-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03449-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incidence of cross-border reproductive care and pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective evaluation of IVF conceptions.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of cross-border reproductive care (CBRC) and maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF), comparing outcomes between pregnancies conceived domestically and through CBRC.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 4475 deliveries at a tertiary public hospital from February 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024. Maternal demographics, medical history, delivery outcomes, and complications were compared using statistical tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results: Among all deliveries, 95 were conceived via IVF. Among the IVF pregnancies, 23 (24.2%) were conceived through CBRC. While CBRC patients were older on average (40.3 vs. 37.8 years), this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). The incidence of hypertensive disorders was significantly higher in CBRC pregnancies compared to domestic IVF pregnancies (69.6% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.01). Trends toward increased rates of postpartum hemorrhage (17.4% vs. 5.8%) and multiple gestations (26.1% vs. 11.6%) were also observed in the CBRC group, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Neonatal outcomes, including rates of preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, and respiratory distress syndrome, were similar between the two groups.
Conclusion: The study highlights a significantly higher percentage of hypertensive disorders among CBRC pregnancies, while other maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable to domestic IVF pregnancies. These findings underscore the need for further research with larger sample sizes and survey-based studies to better understand patient motivations and clinical risks associated with CBRC.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species.
The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.