Shenbo Huang, Shuai He, Guy Romeo Kenmegne, Yijie Yin, You Yu, Yue Fang
{"title":"前部皮下内固定器(INFIX)与钢板固定治疗 Tile C 骨盆骨折前环损伤:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Shenbo Huang, Shuai He, Guy Romeo Kenmegne, Yijie Yin, You Yu, Yue Fang","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02844-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>. The purpose of this study was to compare the reduction effect and clinical outcomes of anterior subcutaneous internal fixation (INFIX) and steel plate-screw internal fixation in the treatment of anterior ring injury in Tile C pelvic fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>. In this retrospective study, the clinical outcomes of 46 patients treated using INFIX and 44 patients treated with steel plate-screw internal fixation were analyzed and compared. All patients underwent anterior and posterior fixation. The Matta imaging scoring system was used to evaluate the postoperative reduction accuracy; the Majeed scoring system was applied to obtain functional outcomes in clinical follow-up. All potential complications were identified and evaluated accordingly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups of patients were followed up for a period of 13-36 months, with an average of 27 months. The procedure time and blood loss in the INFIX group were significantly lower than those in the plate group(t = - 2.327, P = 0.023;t = - 4.053, P = 0.000; there was no statistically significant difference in the Majeed score and Matta score between the two groups after surgery (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>. INFIX treatment for anterior ring injury in Tile C pelvic fractures can achieve good therapeutic effects. Compared to internal fixation with plates and screws, it has advantages such as shorter surgical time and less blood loss. INFIX may be more suitable for obese patients, young women of childbearing age, or patients with urinary system injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anterior subcutaneous internal fixator (INFIX) versus plate fixation for anterior ring injury in Tile C pelvic fractures: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Shenbo Huang, Shuai He, Guy Romeo Kenmegne, Yijie Yin, You Yu, Yue Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-025-02844-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>. The purpose of this study was to compare the reduction effect and clinical outcomes of anterior subcutaneous internal fixation (INFIX) and steel plate-screw internal fixation in the treatment of anterior ring injury in Tile C pelvic fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>. In this retrospective study, the clinical outcomes of 46 patients treated using INFIX and 44 patients treated with steel plate-screw internal fixation were analyzed and compared. All patients underwent anterior and posterior fixation. The Matta imaging scoring system was used to evaluate the postoperative reduction accuracy; the Majeed scoring system was applied to obtain functional outcomes in clinical follow-up. All potential complications were identified and evaluated accordingly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups of patients were followed up for a period of 13-36 months, with an average of 27 months. The procedure time and blood loss in the INFIX group were significantly lower than those in the plate group(t = - 2.327, P = 0.023;t = - 4.053, P = 0.000; there was no statistically significant difference in the Majeed score and Matta score between the two groups after surgery (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>. INFIX treatment for anterior ring injury in Tile C pelvic fractures can achieve good therapeutic effects. Compared to internal fixation with plates and screws, it has advantages such as shorter surgical time and less blood loss. INFIX may be more suitable for obese patients, young women of childbearing age, or patients with urinary system injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927202/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02844-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02844-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:。本研究的目的是比较前路皮下内固定(INFIX)和钢板螺钉内固定治疗骨盆前环损伤的复位效果和临床结果。方法:。在本回顾性研究中,我们对46例使用INFIX和44例钢板螺钉内固定的患者的临床结果进行了分析和比较。所有患者均行前后固定。采用Matta成像评分系统评价术后复位精度;临床随访采用Majeed评分系统评估功能结局。所有潜在的并发症都被识别和评估。结果:两组患者随访13 ~ 36个月,平均27个月。INFIX组手术时间和出血量显著低于钢板组(t = - 2.327, P = 0.023;t = - 4.053, P = 0.000;术后两组患者Majeed评分、Matta评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:。INFIX治疗C片骨盆骨折前环损伤可取得良好的治疗效果。与钢板螺钉内固定相比,具有手术时间短、出血量少等优点。INFIX可能更适合肥胖患者、育龄年轻女性或泌尿系统损伤患者。
Anterior subcutaneous internal fixator (INFIX) versus plate fixation for anterior ring injury in Tile C pelvic fractures: a retrospective study.
Objectives: . The purpose of this study was to compare the reduction effect and clinical outcomes of anterior subcutaneous internal fixation (INFIX) and steel plate-screw internal fixation in the treatment of anterior ring injury in Tile C pelvic fractures.
Methods: . In this retrospective study, the clinical outcomes of 46 patients treated using INFIX and 44 patients treated with steel plate-screw internal fixation were analyzed and compared. All patients underwent anterior and posterior fixation. The Matta imaging scoring system was used to evaluate the postoperative reduction accuracy; the Majeed scoring system was applied to obtain functional outcomes in clinical follow-up. All potential complications were identified and evaluated accordingly.
Results: Both groups of patients were followed up for a period of 13-36 months, with an average of 27 months. The procedure time and blood loss in the INFIX group were significantly lower than those in the plate group(t = - 2.327, P = 0.023;t = - 4.053, P = 0.000; there was no statistically significant difference in the Majeed score and Matta score between the two groups after surgery (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: . INFIX treatment for anterior ring injury in Tile C pelvic fractures can achieve good therapeutic effects. Compared to internal fixation with plates and screws, it has advantages such as shorter surgical time and less blood loss. INFIX may be more suitable for obese patients, young women of childbearing age, or patients with urinary system injuries.