低、高浓度注射溶液在结肠内镜下粘膜下解剖中的作用比较。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Naohisa Yoshida, Ryohei Hirose, Yoshikazu Inagaki, Takaaki Murakami, Yutaka Inada, Daisuke Hasegawa, Yuri Tomita, Reo Kobayashi, Osamu Dohi, Ken Inoue, Yoshito Itoh, Naoyuki Yamaguchi
{"title":"低、高浓度注射溶液在结肠内镜下粘膜下解剖中的作用比较。","authors":"Naohisa Yoshida,&nbsp;Ryohei Hirose,&nbsp;Yoshikazu Inagaki,&nbsp;Takaaki Murakami,&nbsp;Yutaka Inada,&nbsp;Daisuke Hasegawa,&nbsp;Yuri Tomita,&nbsp;Reo Kobayashi,&nbsp;Osamu Dohi,&nbsp;Ken Inoue,&nbsp;Yoshito Itoh,&nbsp;Naoyuki Yamaguchi","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Injection solution is important for achieving submucosal elevation in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and various viscous solutions categorized as low-concentration injection solution (LCS) or high-concentration injection solution (HCS) are used. We analyzed the difference between LCS and HCS in colorectal ESD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial at six Japanese institutions. Patients with early neoplastic lesions of ≥ 20 mm were enrolled from March 2022 to September 2023. Sodium alginate (Liftal K, Kaigen Pharma Co., Osaka, Japan) was used as the injection solution, and the concentration of HCS and LCS was set at 0.6% and 0.3%, respectively. Participants were randomized to HCS or LCS groups and the primary endpoint was the noninferiority about ESD procedure time of LCS compared to HCS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The LCS and HCS groups consisted of 79 and 82 cases, respectively. The ESD procedure time (min, mean ± standard deviation) was significantly noninferior between the LCS and HCS groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and was significantly shorter in the LCS group than in the HCS group (61.9 ± 39.2 vs. 76.9 ± 67.5, <i>p</i> = 0.044). There were no significant differences in en bloc resection (98.7% vs. 100.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.985), perioperative perforation (2.5% vs. 2.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.639), and delayed bleeding (1.3% vs. 1.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.493). In the subgroup analysis, the ESD procedure times were significant for lesions of ≥ 40 mm (74.3 ± 30.4 vs. 125.3 ± 107.2, <i>p</i> = 0.031) and experts (51.5 ± 29.2 vs. 69.4 ± 58.9, <i>p</i> = 0.046). Additionally, injection volumes (mL) were not significant (38.0 ± 20.2 vs. 33.0 ± 27.0, <i>p</i> = 0.098) in the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>LCS was noninferior to HCS in terms of procedure time and significantly reduced it.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry number: UMIN000048661.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"40 6","pages":"1419-1427"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgh.16943","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparison Between Low- and High-Concentration Injection Solution Ability for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection\",\"authors\":\"Naohisa Yoshida,&nbsp;Ryohei Hirose,&nbsp;Yoshikazu Inagaki,&nbsp;Takaaki Murakami,&nbsp;Yutaka Inada,&nbsp;Daisuke Hasegawa,&nbsp;Yuri Tomita,&nbsp;Reo Kobayashi,&nbsp;Osamu Dohi,&nbsp;Ken Inoue,&nbsp;Yoshito Itoh,&nbsp;Naoyuki Yamaguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgh.16943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Injection solution is important for achieving submucosal elevation in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and various viscous solutions categorized as low-concentration injection solution (LCS) or high-concentration injection solution (HCS) are used. We analyzed the difference between LCS and HCS in colorectal ESD.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial at six Japanese institutions. Patients with early neoplastic lesions of ≥ 20 mm were enrolled from March 2022 to September 2023. Sodium alginate (Liftal K, Kaigen Pharma Co., Osaka, Japan) was used as the injection solution, and the concentration of HCS and LCS was set at 0.6% and 0.3%, respectively. Participants were randomized to HCS or LCS groups and the primary endpoint was the noninferiority about ESD procedure time of LCS compared to HCS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The LCS and HCS groups consisted of 79 and 82 cases, respectively. The ESD procedure time (min, mean ± standard deviation) was significantly noninferior between the LCS and HCS groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and was significantly shorter in the LCS group than in the HCS group (61.9 ± 39.2 vs. 76.9 ± 67.5, <i>p</i> = 0.044). There were no significant differences in en bloc resection (98.7% vs. 100.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.985), perioperative perforation (2.5% vs. 2.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.639), and delayed bleeding (1.3% vs. 1.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.493). In the subgroup analysis, the ESD procedure times were significant for lesions of ≥ 40 mm (74.3 ± 30.4 vs. 125.3 ± 107.2, <i>p</i> = 0.031) and experts (51.5 ± 29.2 vs. 69.4 ± 58.9, <i>p</i> = 0.046). Additionally, injection volumes (mL) were not significant (38.0 ± 20.2 vs. 33.0 ± 27.0, <i>p</i> = 0.098) in the two groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>LCS was noninferior to HCS in terms of procedure time and significantly reduced it.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry number: UMIN000048661.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\"40 6\",\"pages\":\"1419-1427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgh.16943\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgh.16943\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgh.16943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:在内镜下粘膜下剥离(ESD)中,注射溶液是实现粘膜下提升的重要手段,使用的黏性溶液分为低浓度注射溶液(LCS)和高浓度注射溶液(HCS)。我们分析了LCS和HCS在结肠ESD中的差异。方法:这是一项前瞻性、随机对照试验,在6家日本机构进行。2022年3月至2023年9月,早期肿瘤病变≥20mm的患者入组。以海藻酸钠(Liftal K, Kaigen Pharma Co., Osaka, Japan)为注射液,HCS和LCS的浓度分别为0.6%和0.3%。参与者被随机分为HCS组或LCS组,主要终点是LCS与HCS相比ESD手术时间的非劣效性。结果:LCS组79例,HCS组82例。LCS组与HCS组的ESD手术时间(min,平均值±标准差)差异无统计学意义(p)。结论:LCS组的手术时间不低于HCS组,且显著缩短了HCS组的手术时间。试验注册:大学医院医学信息网临床试验注册号:UMIN000048661。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Comparison Between Low- and High-Concentration Injection Solution Ability for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Background and Aim

Injection solution is important for achieving submucosal elevation in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and various viscous solutions categorized as low-concentration injection solution (LCS) or high-concentration injection solution (HCS) are used. We analyzed the difference between LCS and HCS in colorectal ESD.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial at six Japanese institutions. Patients with early neoplastic lesions of ≥ 20 mm were enrolled from March 2022 to September 2023. Sodium alginate (Liftal K, Kaigen Pharma Co., Osaka, Japan) was used as the injection solution, and the concentration of HCS and LCS was set at 0.6% and 0.3%, respectively. Participants were randomized to HCS or LCS groups and the primary endpoint was the noninferiority about ESD procedure time of LCS compared to HCS.

Results

The LCS and HCS groups consisted of 79 and 82 cases, respectively. The ESD procedure time (min, mean ± standard deviation) was significantly noninferior between the LCS and HCS groups (p < 0.001) and was significantly shorter in the LCS group than in the HCS group (61.9 ± 39.2 vs. 76.9 ± 67.5, p = 0.044). There were no significant differences in en bloc resection (98.7% vs. 100.0%, p = 0.985), perioperative perforation (2.5% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.639), and delayed bleeding (1.3% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.493). In the subgroup analysis, the ESD procedure times were significant for lesions of ≥ 40 mm (74.3 ± 30.4 vs. 125.3 ± 107.2, p = 0.031) and experts (51.5 ± 29.2 vs. 69.4 ± 58.9, p = 0.046). Additionally, injection volumes (mL) were not significant (38.0 ± 20.2 vs. 33.0 ± 27.0, p = 0.098) in the two groups.

Conclusion

LCS was noninferior to HCS in terms of procedure time and significantly reduced it.

Trial Registration

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry number: UMIN000048661.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信