衡量撒哈拉以南非洲产妇护理的反应性和尊重性待遇:一份问卷验证和评分的制定。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Zoë Morris, Soha El Halabi, Claudia Hanson, Bianca Kandeya, Elizabeth Ayebare, Gisele Houngbo, Anastasia Månsson, Fadhlun Alwy Al-Beity, Kristi Sidney Annerstedt
{"title":"衡量撒哈拉以南非洲产妇护理的反应性和尊重性待遇:一份问卷验证和评分的制定。","authors":"Zoë Morris, Soha El Halabi, Claudia Hanson, Bianca Kandeya, Elizabeth Ayebare, Gisele Houngbo, Anastasia Månsson, Fadhlun Alwy Al-Beity, Kristi Sidney Annerstedt","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07319-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The importance of respectful maternity care on optimal maternal outcomes is increasingly acknowledged globally. However, mistreatment and abuse are still experienced by women during hospital childbirth in many parts of the world, with sub-Saharan Africa being one of the places where it is most common. Interventions aiming to improve respectful maternity care must be able to assess the prevalence of responsiveness and mistreatment women experience. This is usually done with questionnaires, though these are not always validated. Scores to represent the level of responsiveness and mistreatment experienced can be created from questionnaire results and have many uses, though no score is consistently used in this field. A new questionnaire measuring responsiveness and respectful treatment was developed for use in the ALERT project, as a questionnaire covering both of these concepts did not exist. This study aimed to validate this questionnaire and to create a scoring method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Psychometric analyses, including exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, were performed on cross-sectional data collected from the ALERT study to identify and confirm underlying factors. Using these factors, simple summation and factor-weighted methods were used to create scores and their results compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six factors were identified: \"Communication & supportive care\", \"Hospital environment\", \"Maintained respect & dignity\", \"Social support\", \"Maintained privacy & confidentiality\" and \"Lack of physical & verbal abuse\". The results of the two scoring methods developed were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The responsiveness and respectful treatment questionnaire has high validity in the ALERT study population for the six factors identified. The two scoring methods developed are useful for different aspects of the ALERT intervention and can be used to facilitate comparisons or measure progress towards improving respectful maternity care in these settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"329"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring responsiveness and respectful treatment in maternity care in sub-Saharan Africa: a questionnaire validation and development of a score.\",\"authors\":\"Zoë Morris, Soha El Halabi, Claudia Hanson, Bianca Kandeya, Elizabeth Ayebare, Gisele Houngbo, Anastasia Månsson, Fadhlun Alwy Al-Beity, Kristi Sidney Annerstedt\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-07319-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The importance of respectful maternity care on optimal maternal outcomes is increasingly acknowledged globally. However, mistreatment and abuse are still experienced by women during hospital childbirth in many parts of the world, with sub-Saharan Africa being one of the places where it is most common. Interventions aiming to improve respectful maternity care must be able to assess the prevalence of responsiveness and mistreatment women experience. This is usually done with questionnaires, though these are not always validated. Scores to represent the level of responsiveness and mistreatment experienced can be created from questionnaire results and have many uses, though no score is consistently used in this field. A new questionnaire measuring responsiveness and respectful treatment was developed for use in the ALERT project, as a questionnaire covering both of these concepts did not exist. This study aimed to validate this questionnaire and to create a scoring method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Psychometric analyses, including exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, were performed on cross-sectional data collected from the ALERT study to identify and confirm underlying factors. Using these factors, simple summation and factor-weighted methods were used to create scores and their results compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six factors were identified: \\\"Communication & supportive care\\\", \\\"Hospital environment\\\", \\\"Maintained respect & dignity\\\", \\\"Social support\\\", \\\"Maintained privacy & confidentiality\\\" and \\\"Lack of physical & verbal abuse\\\". The results of the two scoring methods developed were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The responsiveness and respectful treatment questionnaire has high validity in the ALERT study population for the six factors identified. The two scoring methods developed are useful for different aspects of the ALERT intervention and can be used to facilitate comparisons or measure progress towards improving respectful maternity care in these settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927248/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07319-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07319-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,尊重产妇护理对最佳产妇结局的重要性日益得到承认。然而,在世界许多地方,妇女在医院分娩期间仍然遭受虐待和虐待,撒哈拉以南非洲是这种情况最常见的地区之一。旨在改善尊重产妇护理的干预措施必须能够评估妇女所遭受的反应和虐待的普遍程度。这通常是通过问卷调查来完成的,尽管这些问卷并不总是有效的。可以从问卷调查结果中创建反映反应程度和所经历的虐待程度的分数,并且有许多用途,尽管在该领域没有一致使用分数。为了在ALERT项目中使用,开发了一份衡量反应性和尊重性的新问卷,因为没有涵盖这两个概念的问卷。本研究旨在验证此问卷并建立评分方法。方法:对从ALERT研究中收集的横断面数据进行心理测量分析,包括探索性和验证性因素分析,以识别和确认潜在因素。利用这些因素,使用简单的求和和因素加权方法来创建分数并对其结果进行比较。结果:确定了六个因素:“沟通和支持性护理”、“医院环境”、“保持尊重和尊严”、“社会支持”、“保持隐私和保密”和“缺乏身体和语言虐待”。所开发的两种评分方法的结果相似。结论:反应性和尊重性问卷在ALERT研究人群中具有较高的效度。开发的两种评分方法对ALERT干预措施的不同方面有用,可用于促进比较或衡量在这些环境中改善尊重产妇护理的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring responsiveness and respectful treatment in maternity care in sub-Saharan Africa: a questionnaire validation and development of a score.

Introduction: The importance of respectful maternity care on optimal maternal outcomes is increasingly acknowledged globally. However, mistreatment and abuse are still experienced by women during hospital childbirth in many parts of the world, with sub-Saharan Africa being one of the places where it is most common. Interventions aiming to improve respectful maternity care must be able to assess the prevalence of responsiveness and mistreatment women experience. This is usually done with questionnaires, though these are not always validated. Scores to represent the level of responsiveness and mistreatment experienced can be created from questionnaire results and have many uses, though no score is consistently used in this field. A new questionnaire measuring responsiveness and respectful treatment was developed for use in the ALERT project, as a questionnaire covering both of these concepts did not exist. This study aimed to validate this questionnaire and to create a scoring method.

Methods: Psychometric analyses, including exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, were performed on cross-sectional data collected from the ALERT study to identify and confirm underlying factors. Using these factors, simple summation and factor-weighted methods were used to create scores and their results compared.

Results: Six factors were identified: "Communication & supportive care", "Hospital environment", "Maintained respect & dignity", "Social support", "Maintained privacy & confidentiality" and "Lack of physical & verbal abuse". The results of the two scoring methods developed were similar.

Conclusions: The responsiveness and respectful treatment questionnaire has high validity in the ALERT study population for the six factors identified. The two scoring methods developed are useful for different aspects of the ALERT intervention and can be used to facilitate comparisons or measure progress towards improving respectful maternity care in these settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信