建立和验证用于法医血统推断和个人身份识别的DIP小组。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Shuanglin Li, Shuyan Mei, Yanfang Liu, Wei Cui, Bofeng Zhu
{"title":"建立和验证用于法医血统推断和个人身份识别的DIP小组。","authors":"Shuanglin Li, Shuyan Mei, Yanfang Liu, Wei Cui, Bofeng Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s40246-025-00727-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biallelic Deletion/Insertion polymorphisms (DIPs), known for their significant diversity across various populations, serve as valuable markers for forensic ancestry inference and personal identification. In this study, we utilized DIPs to provide a potentially powerful forensic examination tool specifically tailored for East Asian populations. Our focus on ancestry allows us to delve deeper into the genetic signatures that characterize this diverse group, offering enhanced resolution in forensic analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 56 autosomal DIPs, 3 Y-chromosome DIPs, and the Amelogenin were selected to build the 60-panel. Population genetic parameters, principal component analysis (PCA), STRUCTURE analysis, and phylogenetic tree construction were employed to evaluate the capacity for ancestry inference. The verification guidelines recommended by the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods were followed in the developmental validations of the 60-panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PCA, STRUCTURE, and phylogenetic tree constructions were not only consistent with each other but also corroborated by previous research. The combined probability of discrimination and the cumulative probability of paternity exclusion values were 0.999999999999 and 0.9937, respectively. These values indicate that the 60-panel is not only a useful tool for personal identification testing within the East Asian population but also provides valuable biogeographic information. Furthermore, the validation study of the 60-panel, which included assessments of PCR conditions, sensitivity, species specificity, stability, mixture analysis, reproducibility, and case sample studies, as well as analysis of degraded samples, demonstrated that the panel is well-suited for forensic testing. The panel's performance was particularly notable in the analysis of degraded samples, showcasing its potential for use in challenging forensic cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The newly developed 60-panel demonstrated robust performance in validation tests, yielding reliable genotypes even from poor-quality samples like degraded DNA. It offers valuable biogeographic insights and sufficient polymorphism for personal identification, which assisted forensic examinations in East Asian populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13183,"journal":{"name":"Human Genomics","volume":"19 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishment and validation of a DIP panel for forensic ancestry inference and personal identification.\",\"authors\":\"Shuanglin Li, Shuyan Mei, Yanfang Liu, Wei Cui, Bofeng Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40246-025-00727-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biallelic Deletion/Insertion polymorphisms (DIPs), known for their significant diversity across various populations, serve as valuable markers for forensic ancestry inference and personal identification. In this study, we utilized DIPs to provide a potentially powerful forensic examination tool specifically tailored for East Asian populations. Our focus on ancestry allows us to delve deeper into the genetic signatures that characterize this diverse group, offering enhanced resolution in forensic analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 56 autosomal DIPs, 3 Y-chromosome DIPs, and the Amelogenin were selected to build the 60-panel. Population genetic parameters, principal component analysis (PCA), STRUCTURE analysis, and phylogenetic tree construction were employed to evaluate the capacity for ancestry inference. The verification guidelines recommended by the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods were followed in the developmental validations of the 60-panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PCA, STRUCTURE, and phylogenetic tree constructions were not only consistent with each other but also corroborated by previous research. The combined probability of discrimination and the cumulative probability of paternity exclusion values were 0.999999999999 and 0.9937, respectively. These values indicate that the 60-panel is not only a useful tool for personal identification testing within the East Asian population but also provides valuable biogeographic information. Furthermore, the validation study of the 60-panel, which included assessments of PCR conditions, sensitivity, species specificity, stability, mixture analysis, reproducibility, and case sample studies, as well as analysis of degraded samples, demonstrated that the panel is well-suited for forensic testing. The panel's performance was particularly notable in the analysis of degraded samples, showcasing its potential for use in challenging forensic cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The newly developed 60-panel demonstrated robust performance in validation tests, yielding reliable genotypes even from poor-quality samples like degraded DNA. It offers valuable biogeographic insights and sufficient polymorphism for personal identification, which assisted forensic examinations in East Asian populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Genomics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927128/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-025-00727-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-025-00727-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:双等位基因缺失/插入多态性(DIPs)因其在不同人群中的显著多样性而闻名,是法医祖先推断和个人身份识别的重要标记。在本研究中,我们利用dip提供了一种专门为东亚人群量身定制的潜在强大的法医检查工具。我们对祖先的关注使我们能够更深入地研究这个多样化群体的遗传特征,为法医分析提供更高的分辨率。方法:选取56个常染色体DIPs、3个y染色体DIPs和Amelogenin组成60个样本。利用群体遗传参数、主成分分析(PCA)、结构分析(STRUCTURE)和系统发育树(phylogenetic tree)等方法评价了群体祖先推断能力。DNA分析方法科学工作组推荐的验证指南在60个面板的开发验证中得到遵循。结果:主成分分析(PCA)、结构分析(STRUCTURE)和系统发育树(phylogenetic tree)结构相互吻合,且与前人研究结果一致。父权排除值的组合概率和累积概率分别为0.999999999999和0.9937。这些值表明,60-panel不仅是东亚人群中个人识别测试的有用工具,而且提供了有价值的生物地理信息。此外,对60个面板的验证研究,包括PCR条件、敏感性、物种特异性、稳定性、混合物分析、可重复性、案例样本研究以及降解样品分析的评估,表明该面板非常适合法医测试。该小组在分析降解样品方面的表现尤其显著,显示了其在具有挑战性的法医案件中的潜力。结论:新开发的60个面板在验证测试中表现出强大的性能,即使从低质量的样品(如降解DNA)中也能产生可靠的基因型。它为个体鉴定提供了有价值的生物地理学见解和充分的多态性,有助于东亚人群的法医鉴定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishment and validation of a DIP panel for forensic ancestry inference and personal identification.

Background: Biallelic Deletion/Insertion polymorphisms (DIPs), known for their significant diversity across various populations, serve as valuable markers for forensic ancestry inference and personal identification. In this study, we utilized DIPs to provide a potentially powerful forensic examination tool specifically tailored for East Asian populations. Our focus on ancestry allows us to delve deeper into the genetic signatures that characterize this diverse group, offering enhanced resolution in forensic analyses.

Methods: A total of 56 autosomal DIPs, 3 Y-chromosome DIPs, and the Amelogenin were selected to build the 60-panel. Population genetic parameters, principal component analysis (PCA), STRUCTURE analysis, and phylogenetic tree construction were employed to evaluate the capacity for ancestry inference. The verification guidelines recommended by the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods were followed in the developmental validations of the 60-panel.

Results: The PCA, STRUCTURE, and phylogenetic tree constructions were not only consistent with each other but also corroborated by previous research. The combined probability of discrimination and the cumulative probability of paternity exclusion values were 0.999999999999 and 0.9937, respectively. These values indicate that the 60-panel is not only a useful tool for personal identification testing within the East Asian population but also provides valuable biogeographic information. Furthermore, the validation study of the 60-panel, which included assessments of PCR conditions, sensitivity, species specificity, stability, mixture analysis, reproducibility, and case sample studies, as well as analysis of degraded samples, demonstrated that the panel is well-suited for forensic testing. The panel's performance was particularly notable in the analysis of degraded samples, showcasing its potential for use in challenging forensic cases.

Conclusion: The newly developed 60-panel demonstrated robust performance in validation tests, yielding reliable genotypes even from poor-quality samples like degraded DNA. It offers valuable biogeographic insights and sufficient polymorphism for personal identification, which assisted forensic examinations in East Asian populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Genomics
Human Genomics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
55
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Genomics is a peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that focuses on the application of genomic analysis in all aspects of human health and disease, as well as genomic analysis of drug efficacy and safety, and comparative genomics. Topics covered by the journal include, but are not limited to: pharmacogenomics, genome-wide association studies, genome-wide sequencing, exome sequencing, next-generation deep-sequencing, functional genomics, epigenomics, translational genomics, expression profiling, proteomics, bioinformatics, animal models, statistical genetics, genetic epidemiology, human population genetics and comparative genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信