通过对不同火用方式的比较,对某地热发电厂进行热经济分析

IF 2.9 2区 地球科学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Zekeriya Özcan, Özgür Ekici
{"title":"通过对不同火用方式的比较,对某地热发电厂进行热经济分析","authors":"Zekeriya Özcan,&nbsp;Özgür Ekici","doi":"10.1186/s40517-025-00335-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exergoeconomics is a vital complementation of thermodynamic performance analysis. In this study, a comprehensive exergoeconomic analysis of a binary geothermal power plant in southwestern Anatolia is conducted to determine improvement potentials in the plant configuration. By utilization of cost allocation rules of three different exergoeconomic methods (Moran, Specific Exergy Costing (SPECO), Exergy Cost Theory) plant is analyzed in terms of exergetic costs and possible optimization areas. Levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) estimated by 3 different methods vary within a 3.6% range, between 7.81 c$/kWh and 8.1 c$/kWh. It has also been determined that 51.5% of LCOE is constituted by waste/residual costs. Components especially including a thermal phase change or energy conversion, whose exergoeconomic factors below 0.5 warrant investment and optimization for performance improvement despite their higher individual exergetic efficiencies reported in previous studies. This phenomenon highlights the importance of considering exergetic efficiency and exergoeconomic factors together as plant design parameters. By using advanced materials or by optimizing the temperature gradient between the geothermal brine and the working fluid, heat transfer efficiency can be enhanced in heat exchanger devices. Turbines generally have mechanical losses which can be enhanced by optimizing blade design, reducing friction, and enhancing the thermodynamic cycle (i.e., use re-heat stages or improve steam conditions).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48643,"journal":{"name":"Geothermal Energy","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://geothermal-energy-journal.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s40517-025-00335-8","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermoeconomic analysis of a geothermal power plant by comparison of different exergetic methods\",\"authors\":\"Zekeriya Özcan,&nbsp;Özgür Ekici\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40517-025-00335-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Exergoeconomics is a vital complementation of thermodynamic performance analysis. In this study, a comprehensive exergoeconomic analysis of a binary geothermal power plant in southwestern Anatolia is conducted to determine improvement potentials in the plant configuration. By utilization of cost allocation rules of three different exergoeconomic methods (Moran, Specific Exergy Costing (SPECO), Exergy Cost Theory) plant is analyzed in terms of exergetic costs and possible optimization areas. Levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) estimated by 3 different methods vary within a 3.6% range, between 7.81 c$/kWh and 8.1 c$/kWh. It has also been determined that 51.5% of LCOE is constituted by waste/residual costs. Components especially including a thermal phase change or energy conversion, whose exergoeconomic factors below 0.5 warrant investment and optimization for performance improvement despite their higher individual exergetic efficiencies reported in previous studies. This phenomenon highlights the importance of considering exergetic efficiency and exergoeconomic factors together as plant design parameters. By using advanced materials or by optimizing the temperature gradient between the geothermal brine and the working fluid, heat transfer efficiency can be enhanced in heat exchanger devices. Turbines generally have mechanical losses which can be enhanced by optimizing blade design, reducing friction, and enhancing the thermodynamic cycle (i.e., use re-heat stages or improve steam conditions).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geothermal Energy\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://geothermal-energy-journal.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s40517-025-00335-8\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geothermal Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40517-025-00335-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geothermal Energy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40517-025-00335-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

燃烧经济学是热力学性能分析的重要补充。在这项研究中,对安纳托利亚西南部的一个二元地热发电厂进行了全面的努力经济分析,以确定电厂配置的改进潜力。运用三种不同的火用经济方法(Moran法、SPECO法、火用成本理论)对电厂的火用成本和可能的优化区域进行了分析。三种不同方法估算的平准化电力成本(LCOE)在3.6%的范围内变化,在7.81 c$/kWh和8.1 c$/kWh之间。还确定了51.5%的成本成本是由废物/剩余成本构成的。特别是包括热相变或能量转换的组件,其消耗经济因子低于0.5,尽管在以前的研究中报告了更高的单个消耗效率,但仍需要投资和优化以提高性能。这一现象突出了将燃烧效率和燃烧经济性因素作为电厂设计参数一并考虑的重要性。通过采用先进材料或优化地热卤水与工质之间的温度梯度,可以提高换热器装置的换热效率。涡轮机通常有机械损失,可以通过优化叶片设计、减少摩擦和增强热力学循环(即使用再热级或改善蒸汽条件)来增强机械损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thermoeconomic analysis of a geothermal power plant by comparison of different exergetic methods

Exergoeconomics is a vital complementation of thermodynamic performance analysis. In this study, a comprehensive exergoeconomic analysis of a binary geothermal power plant in southwestern Anatolia is conducted to determine improvement potentials in the plant configuration. By utilization of cost allocation rules of three different exergoeconomic methods (Moran, Specific Exergy Costing (SPECO), Exergy Cost Theory) plant is analyzed in terms of exergetic costs and possible optimization areas. Levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) estimated by 3 different methods vary within a 3.6% range, between 7.81 c$/kWh and 8.1 c$/kWh. It has also been determined that 51.5% of LCOE is constituted by waste/residual costs. Components especially including a thermal phase change or energy conversion, whose exergoeconomic factors below 0.5 warrant investment and optimization for performance improvement despite their higher individual exergetic efficiencies reported in previous studies. This phenomenon highlights the importance of considering exergetic efficiency and exergoeconomic factors together as plant design parameters. By using advanced materials or by optimizing the temperature gradient between the geothermal brine and the working fluid, heat transfer efficiency can be enhanced in heat exchanger devices. Turbines generally have mechanical losses which can be enhanced by optimizing blade design, reducing friction, and enhancing the thermodynamic cycle (i.e., use re-heat stages or improve steam conditions).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geothermal Energy
Geothermal Energy Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geothermal Energy is a peer-reviewed fully open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. It focuses on fundamental and applied research needed to deploy technologies for developing and integrating geothermal energy as one key element in the future energy portfolio. Contributions include geological, geophysical, and geochemical studies; exploration of geothermal fields; reservoir characterization and modeling; development of productivity-enhancing methods; and approaches to achieve robust and economic plant operation. Geothermal Energy serves to examine the interaction of individual system components while taking the whole process into account, from the development of the reservoir to the economic provision of geothermal energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信