2023年埃塞俄比亚塔纳盆地南部上Gilgel Abay流域形态计量学分析及其对水土资源管理的启示

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Simachew Bantigegn Wassie, Melkamu Alebachew Anleye
{"title":"2023年埃塞俄比亚塔纳盆地南部上Gilgel Abay流域形态计量学分析及其对水土资源管理的启示","authors":"Simachew Bantigegn Wassie,&nbsp;Melkamu Alebachew Anleye","doi":"10.1007/s13201-025-02385-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Upper Gilgel Abay watershed (UGAW) has important physiographical and hydrological implications for the Blue Nile basin, but research on its morphometry and hydrology is limited. This study tried to delineate the UGAW and its sub-watersheds, compute basic morphometric parameters, and link each value with its drainage characteristics. Ranking and prioritization of the sub-watersheds were also done to suggest future interventions. GIS and remote sensing techniques were utilized to delineate the sub-watersheds and compute 32 selected basic morphometric parameters. A 12.5-m resolution ALOS PALSAR DEM was the input data used in GIS software to analyze and characterize the hydro-geo-morphometric features. The findings indicated that the watershed exhibits a dendritic pattern with six stream orders. A 1314.4 km total flow length for all orders is distributed within a 1657.5 km<sup>2</sup> catchment area. The infiltration number is high, causing greater surface runoff, while its low circularity ratio (0.27), elongation ratio (0.52), and bifurcation ratio (2.1) connote the basin’s nearly compact shape. Besides, it has high basin relief (1650 m), slope, and ruggedness number, implying high erosional potential in the area. Generally, the watershed experiences high runoff and minimal infiltration, making it highly prone to soil erosion and land degradation. UGAW was divided into six sub-watersheds (SW1–SW6), each characterized by distinct hydro-geo-morphometric features. The prioritization of these sub-watersheds was based on 20 purposely selected parameters. Consequently, the sub-watersheds were ranked from highest to lowest priority as follows: SW6, SW5, SW4, SW3, SW1, and SW2. This ranking indicates that SW6 and SW5 are more susceptible to various forms of degradation in land, water, and other natural resources, necessitating a high priority for the implementation of integrated land and water resource management strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8374,"journal":{"name":"Applied Water Science","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-025-02385-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morphometry of upper Gilgel Abay watershed in southern Tana Basin, Ethiopia, 2023: analysis and implication for land and water resource management\",\"authors\":\"Simachew Bantigegn Wassie,&nbsp;Melkamu Alebachew Anleye\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13201-025-02385-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Upper Gilgel Abay watershed (UGAW) has important physiographical and hydrological implications for the Blue Nile basin, but research on its morphometry and hydrology is limited. This study tried to delineate the UGAW and its sub-watersheds, compute basic morphometric parameters, and link each value with its drainage characteristics. Ranking and prioritization of the sub-watersheds were also done to suggest future interventions. GIS and remote sensing techniques were utilized to delineate the sub-watersheds and compute 32 selected basic morphometric parameters. A 12.5-m resolution ALOS PALSAR DEM was the input data used in GIS software to analyze and characterize the hydro-geo-morphometric features. The findings indicated that the watershed exhibits a dendritic pattern with six stream orders. A 1314.4 km total flow length for all orders is distributed within a 1657.5 km<sup>2</sup> catchment area. The infiltration number is high, causing greater surface runoff, while its low circularity ratio (0.27), elongation ratio (0.52), and bifurcation ratio (2.1) connote the basin’s nearly compact shape. Besides, it has high basin relief (1650 m), slope, and ruggedness number, implying high erosional potential in the area. Generally, the watershed experiences high runoff and minimal infiltration, making it highly prone to soil erosion and land degradation. UGAW was divided into six sub-watersheds (SW1–SW6), each characterized by distinct hydro-geo-morphometric features. The prioritization of these sub-watersheds was based on 20 purposely selected parameters. Consequently, the sub-watersheds were ranked from highest to lowest priority as follows: SW6, SW5, SW4, SW3, SW1, and SW2. This ranking indicates that SW6 and SW5 are more susceptible to various forms of degradation in land, water, and other natural resources, necessitating a high priority for the implementation of integrated land and water resource management strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Water Science\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-025-02385-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Water Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-025-02385-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Water Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-025-02385-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上Gilgel Abay流域(UGAW)对青尼罗河流域具有重要的地理和水文意义,但对其形态和水文的研究有限。本研究尝试圈定UGAW及其子流域,计算基本形态计量参数,并将各参数与流域排水特征联系起来。还对子流域进行了排序和优先排序,以建议未来的干预措施。利用GIS和遥感技术对流域进行了圈定,并计算了32个选定的基本形态测量参数。12.5 m分辨率的ALOS PALSAR DEM是GIS软件中用于分析和表征水文地理形态特征的输入数据。研究结果表明,该流域呈树突状分布,具有6个流阶。所有订单的总流量长度为1314.4公里,分布在1657.5平方公里的集水区内。入渗数高,地表径流量大,而其低圆度比(0.27)、低延伸比(0.52)和低分叉比(2.1)则暗示了该流域近乎紧凑的形状。盆地起伏度高(1650 m),坡度大,起伏度高,具有较高的侵蚀潜力。一般来说,该流域径流量大,入渗少,极易发生土壤侵蚀和土地退化。UGAW被划分为六个子流域(SW1-SW6),每个子流域都具有不同的水文地理形态特征。这些子流域的优先级是基于20个有目的地选择的参数。因此,子流域的优先级由高到低依次为:SW6、SW5、SW4、SW3、SW1和SW2。这一排名表明,SW6和SW5更容易受到土地、水和其他自然资源各种形式退化的影响,因此需要高度优先实施土地和水资源综合管理战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Morphometry of upper Gilgel Abay watershed in southern Tana Basin, Ethiopia, 2023: analysis and implication for land and water resource management

Upper Gilgel Abay watershed (UGAW) has important physiographical and hydrological implications for the Blue Nile basin, but research on its morphometry and hydrology is limited. This study tried to delineate the UGAW and its sub-watersheds, compute basic morphometric parameters, and link each value with its drainage characteristics. Ranking and prioritization of the sub-watersheds were also done to suggest future interventions. GIS and remote sensing techniques were utilized to delineate the sub-watersheds and compute 32 selected basic morphometric parameters. A 12.5-m resolution ALOS PALSAR DEM was the input data used in GIS software to analyze and characterize the hydro-geo-morphometric features. The findings indicated that the watershed exhibits a dendritic pattern with six stream orders. A 1314.4 km total flow length for all orders is distributed within a 1657.5 km2 catchment area. The infiltration number is high, causing greater surface runoff, while its low circularity ratio (0.27), elongation ratio (0.52), and bifurcation ratio (2.1) connote the basin’s nearly compact shape. Besides, it has high basin relief (1650 m), slope, and ruggedness number, implying high erosional potential in the area. Generally, the watershed experiences high runoff and minimal infiltration, making it highly prone to soil erosion and land degradation. UGAW was divided into six sub-watersheds (SW1–SW6), each characterized by distinct hydro-geo-morphometric features. The prioritization of these sub-watersheds was based on 20 purposely selected parameters. Consequently, the sub-watersheds were ranked from highest to lowest priority as follows: SW6, SW5, SW4, SW3, SW1, and SW2. This ranking indicates that SW6 and SW5 are more susceptible to various forms of degradation in land, water, and other natural resources, necessitating a high priority for the implementation of integrated land and water resource management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Water Science
Applied Water Science WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信