心理和社会结构决定因素的意图使用毒品检查服务。

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Timothy Piatkowski, Kyra Hamilton, Martin S Hagger
{"title":"心理和社会结构决定因素的意图使用毒品检查服务。","authors":"Timothy Piatkowski, Kyra Hamilton, Martin S Hagger","doi":"10.1177/13591053251321783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored the determinants of intentions to use drug checking services among Australian undergraduate students (<i>N</i> = 324, <i>M age</i> = 22.32 years, SD = 7.21) using an integrated theoretical model that includes social cognition constructs (risk perception, subjective norms, attitudes), health and drug literacy, and socio-structural factors (education, race, employment). A cross-sectional correlational survey design and path analysis revealed that social cognition constructs directly influenced drug checking intentions, while drug literacy and socio-structural variables indirectly influenced intentions through these constructs. Notably, race had a negative indirect effect, while drug and health literacy had a positive indirect effect on intentions. The findings highlight the importance of utility beliefs, perceived risks, and social influences in shaping intentions to use drug checking services. These insights offer a foundation for future behavioral interventions targeting belief-based determinants to promote the use of drug checking services, potentially reducing health risks associated with drug use.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13591053251321783"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological and socio-structural determinants of intentions to use drug checking services.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Piatkowski, Kyra Hamilton, Martin S Hagger\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13591053251321783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study explored the determinants of intentions to use drug checking services among Australian undergraduate students (<i>N</i> = 324, <i>M age</i> = 22.32 years, SD = 7.21) using an integrated theoretical model that includes social cognition constructs (risk perception, subjective norms, attitudes), health and drug literacy, and socio-structural factors (education, race, employment). A cross-sectional correlational survey design and path analysis revealed that social cognition constructs directly influenced drug checking intentions, while drug literacy and socio-structural variables indirectly influenced intentions through these constructs. Notably, race had a negative indirect effect, while drug and health literacy had a positive indirect effect on intentions. The findings highlight the importance of utility beliefs, perceived risks, and social influences in shaping intentions to use drug checking services. These insights offer a foundation for future behavioral interventions targeting belief-based determinants to promote the use of drug checking services, potentially reducing health risks associated with drug use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13591053251321783\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251321783\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251321783","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用一个综合理论模型,探讨了澳大利亚本科生(人数=324,中位年龄=22.32岁,标准差=7.21)使用毒品检查服务意向的决定因素,该模型包括社会认知建构(风险感知、主观规范、态度)、健康和毒品知识以及社会结构因素(教育、种族、就业)。横截面相关调查设计和路径分析显示,社会认知建构直接影响毒品检查意向,而毒品知识和社会结构变量则通过这些建构间接影响意向。值得注意的是,种族对意向有负面的间接影响,而毒品知识和健康知识对意向有正面的间接影响。研究结果凸显了效用信念、感知风险和社会影响在形成使用药物检查服务意愿方面的重要性。这些见解为今后针对基于信念的决定因素采取行为干预措施奠定了基础,以促进毒品检查服务的使用,从而降低与毒品使用相关的健康风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychological and socio-structural determinants of intentions to use drug checking services.

This study explored the determinants of intentions to use drug checking services among Australian undergraduate students (N = 324, M age = 22.32 years, SD = 7.21) using an integrated theoretical model that includes social cognition constructs (risk perception, subjective norms, attitudes), health and drug literacy, and socio-structural factors (education, race, employment). A cross-sectional correlational survey design and path analysis revealed that social cognition constructs directly influenced drug checking intentions, while drug literacy and socio-structural variables indirectly influenced intentions through these constructs. Notably, race had a negative indirect effect, while drug and health literacy had a positive indirect effect on intentions. The findings highlight the importance of utility beliefs, perceived risks, and social influences in shaping intentions to use drug checking services. These insights offer a foundation for future behavioral interventions targeting belief-based determinants to promote the use of drug checking services, potentially reducing health risks associated with drug use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信