阿拉伯数字噪声测试:与听力损失的关系以及双相位和反相位版本的比较。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Trends in Hearing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1177/23312165251320439
Adnan M Shehabi, Christopher J Plack, Margaret Zuriekat, Ola Aboudi, Stephen A Roberts, Joseph Laycock, Hannah Guest
{"title":"阿拉伯数字噪声测试:与听力损失的关系以及双相位和反相位版本的比较。","authors":"Adnan M Shehabi, Christopher J Plack, Margaret Zuriekat, Ola Aboudi, Stephen A Roberts, Joseph Laycock, Hannah Guest","doi":"10.1177/23312165251320439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study set out to acquire validation data for Arabic versions of the Digits-in-Noise (DIN) test, measured using browser-based software suitable for home hearing screening. DIN and pure-tone audiometric (PTA) thresholds were obtained from a sample of 155 Arabic-speaking participants, varying widely in age and in degree and type of hearing loss. DIN thresholds were measured using both diotic and antiphasic stimuli, with the goal of determining whether antiphasic testing provides superior prediction of poorer-ear hearing loss. A comprehensive study protocol was publicly pre-registered via the Open Science Framework. Both types of DIN threshold correlate with poorer-ear PTA thresholds after controlling for age, but the correlation is significantly stronger for antiphasic than diotic stimuli. Antiphasic DIN thresholds increase more steeply than diotic DIN thresholds as poorer-ear PTA thresholds increase, and are superior binary classifiers of hearing loss. Combined with previous results based on DIN data measured in participants' homes, the present findings suggest that the browser-based Arabic DIN test may be effective in remote hearing screening, when combined with antiphasic digit presentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":"29 ","pages":"23312165251320439"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arabic Digits-in-Noise Tests: Relations to Hearing Loss and Comparison of Diotic and Antiphasic Versions.\",\"authors\":\"Adnan M Shehabi, Christopher J Plack, Margaret Zuriekat, Ola Aboudi, Stephen A Roberts, Joseph Laycock, Hannah Guest\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23312165251320439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study set out to acquire validation data for Arabic versions of the Digits-in-Noise (DIN) test, measured using browser-based software suitable for home hearing screening. DIN and pure-tone audiometric (PTA) thresholds were obtained from a sample of 155 Arabic-speaking participants, varying widely in age and in degree and type of hearing loss. DIN thresholds were measured using both diotic and antiphasic stimuli, with the goal of determining whether antiphasic testing provides superior prediction of poorer-ear hearing loss. A comprehensive study protocol was publicly pre-registered via the Open Science Framework. Both types of DIN threshold correlate with poorer-ear PTA thresholds after controlling for age, but the correlation is significantly stronger for antiphasic than diotic stimuli. Antiphasic DIN thresholds increase more steeply than diotic DIN thresholds as poorer-ear PTA thresholds increase, and are superior binary classifiers of hearing loss. Combined with previous results based on DIN data measured in participants' homes, the present findings suggest that the browser-based Arabic DIN test may be effective in remote hearing screening, when combined with antiphasic digit presentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Hearing\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"23312165251320439\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930467/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Hearing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165251320439\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165251320439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究着手获取阿拉伯语版本的噪声数字(DIN)测试的验证数据,使用适合家庭听力筛查的基于浏览器的软件进行测量。DIN和纯音听力测量(PTA)阈值来自155名讲阿拉伯语的参与者,他们的年龄、听力损失的程度和类型差异很大。DIN阈值采用双相和反相刺激测量,目的是确定反相测试是否能更好地预测较差耳听力损失。全面的研究方案通过开放科学框架公开预注册。在控制年龄后,两种类型的DIN阈值都与较差的耳PTA阈值相关,但反相刺激的相关性明显强于双相刺激。随着差耳PTA阈值的增加,反相DIN阈值比双相DIN阈值增加得更快,并且是听力损失的更好的二元分类器。结合先前在参与者家中测量的DIN数据的结果,本研究结果表明,当与反相数字呈现相结合时,基于浏览器的阿拉伯语DIN测试可能在远程听力筛查中有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arabic Digits-in-Noise Tests: Relations to Hearing Loss and Comparison of Diotic and Antiphasic Versions.

The study set out to acquire validation data for Arabic versions of the Digits-in-Noise (DIN) test, measured using browser-based software suitable for home hearing screening. DIN and pure-tone audiometric (PTA) thresholds were obtained from a sample of 155 Arabic-speaking participants, varying widely in age and in degree and type of hearing loss. DIN thresholds were measured using both diotic and antiphasic stimuli, with the goal of determining whether antiphasic testing provides superior prediction of poorer-ear hearing loss. A comprehensive study protocol was publicly pre-registered via the Open Science Framework. Both types of DIN threshold correlate with poorer-ear PTA thresholds after controlling for age, but the correlation is significantly stronger for antiphasic than diotic stimuli. Antiphasic DIN thresholds increase more steeply than diotic DIN thresholds as poorer-ear PTA thresholds increase, and are superior binary classifiers of hearing loss. Combined with previous results based on DIN data measured in participants' homes, the present findings suggest that the browser-based Arabic DIN test may be effective in remote hearing screening, when combined with antiphasic digit presentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Hearing
Trends in Hearing AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGYOTORH-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Trends in Hearing is an open access journal completely dedicated to publishing original research and reviews focusing on human hearing, hearing loss, hearing aids, auditory implants, and aural rehabilitation. Under its former name, Trends in Amplification, the journal established itself as a forum for concise explorations of all areas of translational hearing research by leaders in the field. Trends in Hearing has now expanded its focus to include original research articles, with the goal of becoming the premier venue for research related to human hearing and hearing loss.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信