IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Fangli Xia, Mitchell J. Nathan, Kelsey E. Schenck, Michael I. Swart
{"title":"Action Predictions Facilitate Embodied Geometric Reasoning","authors":"Fangli Xia,&nbsp;Mitchell J. Nathan,&nbsp;Kelsey E. Schenck,&nbsp;Michael I. Swart","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Task-relevant actions can facilitate mathematical thinking, even for complex topics, such as mathematical proof. We investigated whether such cognitive benefits also occur for action predictions. The action-cognition transduction (ACT) model posits a reciprocal relationship between movements and reasoning. Movements—imagined as well as real ones operating on real or imaginary objects—activate feedforward mechanisms for the plausible predicted outcomes of motor system planning, along with feedback from the effect actions have on the world. Thus, ACT posits cognitive influences for making action predictions regardless of whether those actions are performed. Using a two-by-two factorial design, we investigated how generating task-relevant <i>action predictions</i> or performing task-relevant <i>directed actions</i> influenced undergraduates’ (<i>N</i> = 127) geometry proof performance. As predicted, making action predictions significantly enhanced participants’ proof production. No evidence suggests that combining action predictions and directed actions provided additional benefits, supporting the claim that predicting and performing actions engage overlapping processes, as theorized by ACT. <i>Gestural replays</i>, reenactments of previously performed actions during explanations, were associated with significantly better insight and proof performance for both (actor-generated) predicted actions and (investigator-generated) directed actions. Prompting people to predict task-relevant actions enhances mathematical cognition, possibly through simulated actions of transformations on imagined mathematical objects, as revealed by increased production of speech describing mathematical operations and increased production of gestural replays. We discuss the theoretical implications of these findings regarding the influences of embodied simulation of movements on cognition, and the educational implications of facilitating mathematical reasoning through interventions prompting students to perform and imagine performing task-relevant body movements.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"49 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.70055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与任务相关的行动可以促进数学思维,即使是数学证明等复杂的主题。我们研究了这种认知益处是否也会发生在动作预测上。动作-认知转换(ACT)模型认为动作与推理之间存在互惠关系。动作--想象中的动作以及在真实或想象物体上操作的真实动作--激活了运动系统规划的合理预测结果的前馈机制,以及动作对世界产生的影响的反馈。因此,ACT 假设了认知对行动预测的影响,无论这些行动是否被执行。我们采用二乘二的因子设计,研究了生成任务相关的行动预测或执行任务相关的定向行动如何影响本科生(127 人)的几何证明成绩。正如预测的那样,进行动作预测能显著提高参与者的证明能力。没有证据表明,将动作预测和定向动作结合在一起会带来额外的益处,这支持了预测和执行动作会产生重叠过程的说法,正如 ACT 所理论的那样。手势重演,即在解释过程中重演先前所做的动作,与(演员生成的)预测动作和(研究者生成的)指导动作的洞察力和证明能力的显著提高有关。提示人们预测与任务相关的动作可以增强数学认知,这可能是通过模拟对想象中的数学对象进行转换的动作实现的,描述数学运算的语音生成增加和手势重演生成增加也揭示了这一点。我们讨论了这些研究结果的理论意义,即体现性模拟动作对认知的影响,以及通过干预措施促使学生执行和想象执行与任务相关的肢体动作来促进数学推理的教育意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Action Predictions Facilitate Embodied Geometric Reasoning

Action Predictions Facilitate Embodied Geometric Reasoning

Task-relevant actions can facilitate mathematical thinking, even for complex topics, such as mathematical proof. We investigated whether such cognitive benefits also occur for action predictions. The action-cognition transduction (ACT) model posits a reciprocal relationship between movements and reasoning. Movements—imagined as well as real ones operating on real or imaginary objects—activate feedforward mechanisms for the plausible predicted outcomes of motor system planning, along with feedback from the effect actions have on the world. Thus, ACT posits cognitive influences for making action predictions regardless of whether those actions are performed. Using a two-by-two factorial design, we investigated how generating task-relevant action predictions or performing task-relevant directed actions influenced undergraduates’ (N = 127) geometry proof performance. As predicted, making action predictions significantly enhanced participants’ proof production. No evidence suggests that combining action predictions and directed actions provided additional benefits, supporting the claim that predicting and performing actions engage overlapping processes, as theorized by ACT. Gestural replays, reenactments of previously performed actions during explanations, were associated with significantly better insight and proof performance for both (actor-generated) predicted actions and (investigator-generated) directed actions. Prompting people to predict task-relevant actions enhances mathematical cognition, possibly through simulated actions of transformations on imagined mathematical objects, as revealed by increased production of speech describing mathematical operations and increased production of gestural replays. We discuss the theoretical implications of these findings regarding the influences of embodied simulation of movements on cognition, and the educational implications of facilitating mathematical reasoning through interventions prompting students to perform and imagine performing task-relevant body movements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Science
Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Cognitive Science publishes articles in all areas of cognitive science, covering such topics as knowledge representation, inference, memory processes, learning, problem solving, planning, perception, natural language understanding, connectionism, brain theory, motor control, intentional systems, and other areas of interdisciplinary concern. Highest priority is given to research reports that are specifically written for a multidisciplinary audience. The audience is primarily researchers in cognitive science and its associated fields, including anthropologists, education researchers, psychologists, philosophers, linguists, computer scientists, neuroscientists, and roboticists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信