上呼吸道狭窄对办公室蓝色激光手术患者耐受性的影响。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Abdul-Latif Hamdan, Marc Mourad, Patrick Abou Raji Feghali, Zeina Maria Semaan, Marwan Rizk, Omar Aboul Hosn, Jonathan Abou Chaar, Hani Tamim
{"title":"上呼吸道狭窄对办公室蓝色激光手术患者耐受性的影响。","authors":"Abdul-Latif Hamdan, Marc Mourad, Patrick Abou Raji Feghali, Zeina Maria Semaan, Marwan Rizk, Omar Aboul Hosn, Jonathan Abou Chaar, Hani Tamim","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of upper airway narrowing on patient tolerance in office-based laser surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent office-based blue laser surgery for benign and premalignant laryngeal lesions between November 2021 and September 2024 were reviewed. The Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale questionnaire and the Visual analogue scale score for discomfort were used. Demographic data included age, gender, smoking, Body mass Index, comorbidities, and etiology of dysphonia. Four anatomical sites of the upper airway were evaluated for the presence of narrowing: the nose, nasopharynx, oro-/hypopharynx, and larynx.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89 patients were included. The most common site of upper airway narrowing was the nose in 74.1% of the cases. This was followed by the nasopharynx and oro-hypopharynx in 23.5% and 20.2% of the cases, respectively. Only 11 patients had laryngeal narrowing with the most common cause being prolapse of the epiglottis. The mean IOWA score of the study group was 1.5 ± 1.1. There was no significant difference in the mean IOWA score between those with or without laryngeal narrowing. The mean VAS score was 2.98 ± 2.47. There was also no significant difference in the mean VAS discomfort score in patients with or without upper airway narrowing, except in those with oro-/hypopharyngeal narrowing (P = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upper airway narrowing had a nonsignificant impact on patient tolerance and discomfort. Nevertheless, patients with narrowing of the upper airway require diligent handling of the endoscope to reduce any potential discomfort.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Upper Airway Narrowing on Patient Tolerance in Office-Based Blue Laser Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Abdul-Latif Hamdan, Marc Mourad, Patrick Abou Raji Feghali, Zeina Maria Semaan, Marwan Rizk, Omar Aboul Hosn, Jonathan Abou Chaar, Hani Tamim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.02.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of upper airway narrowing on patient tolerance in office-based laser surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent office-based blue laser surgery for benign and premalignant laryngeal lesions between November 2021 and September 2024 were reviewed. The Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale questionnaire and the Visual analogue scale score for discomfort were used. Demographic data included age, gender, smoking, Body mass Index, comorbidities, and etiology of dysphonia. Four anatomical sites of the upper airway were evaluated for the presence of narrowing: the nose, nasopharynx, oro-/hypopharynx, and larynx.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89 patients were included. The most common site of upper airway narrowing was the nose in 74.1% of the cases. This was followed by the nasopharynx and oro-hypopharynx in 23.5% and 20.2% of the cases, respectively. Only 11 patients had laryngeal narrowing with the most common cause being prolapse of the epiglottis. The mean IOWA score of the study group was 1.5 ± 1.1. There was no significant difference in the mean IOWA score between those with or without laryngeal narrowing. The mean VAS score was 2.98 ± 2.47. There was also no significant difference in the mean VAS discomfort score in patients with or without upper airway narrowing, except in those with oro-/hypopharyngeal narrowing (P = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upper airway narrowing had a nonsignificant impact on patient tolerance and discomfort. Nevertheless, patients with narrowing of the upper airway require diligent handling of the endoscope to reduce any potential discomfort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.02.015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.02.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估在办公室激光手术中上呼吸道狭窄对患者耐受性的影响。研究设计:回顾性图表回顾。方法:回顾所有在2021年11月至2024年9月期间接受办公室蓝色激光手术治疗喉良性和癌前病变的患者。采用爱荷华麻醉满意度问卷和视觉模拟量表对不适进行评分。人口统计数据包括年龄、性别、吸烟、体重指数、合并症和语音障碍的病因。评估上呼吸道的四个解剖部位是否存在狭窄:鼻、鼻咽、口咽/下咽和喉。结果:共纳入89例患者。上呼吸道狭窄最常见部位为鼻腔,占74.1%。其次是鼻咽和口腔下咽,分别占23.5%和20.2%。只有11例患者喉狭窄,最常见的原因是会厌脱垂。研究组的平均IOWA评分为1.5±1.1分。有或没有喉部狭窄的患者在平均爱荷华评分上没有显著差异。平均VAS评分为2.98±2.47。除口咽/下咽变窄组外,上气道变窄组和非上气道变窄组的平均VAS不适评分也无显著差异(P = 0.011)。结论:上气道狭窄对患者耐受性和不适无显著影响。然而,上呼吸道狭窄的患者需要认真处理内窥镜,以减少任何潜在的不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Upper Airway Narrowing on Patient Tolerance in Office-Based Blue Laser Surgery.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of upper airway narrowing on patient tolerance in office-based laser surgery.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Methods: All patients who underwent office-based blue laser surgery for benign and premalignant laryngeal lesions between November 2021 and September 2024 were reviewed. The Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale questionnaire and the Visual analogue scale score for discomfort were used. Demographic data included age, gender, smoking, Body mass Index, comorbidities, and etiology of dysphonia. Four anatomical sites of the upper airway were evaluated for the presence of narrowing: the nose, nasopharynx, oro-/hypopharynx, and larynx.

Results: A total of 89 patients were included. The most common site of upper airway narrowing was the nose in 74.1% of the cases. This was followed by the nasopharynx and oro-hypopharynx in 23.5% and 20.2% of the cases, respectively. Only 11 patients had laryngeal narrowing with the most common cause being prolapse of the epiglottis. The mean IOWA score of the study group was 1.5 ± 1.1. There was no significant difference in the mean IOWA score between those with or without laryngeal narrowing. The mean VAS score was 2.98 ± 2.47. There was also no significant difference in the mean VAS discomfort score in patients with or without upper airway narrowing, except in those with oro-/hypopharyngeal narrowing (P = 0.011).

Conclusion: Upper airway narrowing had a nonsignificant impact on patient tolerance and discomfort. Nevertheless, patients with narrowing of the upper airway require diligent handling of the endoscope to reduce any potential discomfort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信