喉科实践趋势:治疗慢性咳嗽的神经调节剂。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1002/lary.32109
Christopher D Dwyer, Michael M Johns, Jennifer J Shin, Thomas L Carroll
{"title":"喉科实践趋势:治疗慢性咳嗽的神经调节剂。","authors":"Christopher D Dwyer, Michael M Johns, Jennifer J Shin, Thomas L Carroll","doi":"10.1002/lary.32109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess practice trends among laryngologists within the United States surrounding neuromodulator use for chronic cough treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anonymous 29-item survey comprised of a mixture of multiple choice, Likert scale, and free-text answers was electronically distributed to practicing laryngologists in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five laryngologists from 26 states responded. The majority (96.5%) prescribe neuromodulators for chronic cough and are the preferred first-line treatment for refractory explained chronic cough (37.8%) and unexplained chronic cough (50.6%). Gabapentin (97.6%), amitriptyline (91.5%), and tramadol (73.2%) are the most used. The preferred first-line drugs were also gabapentin (45.1%), amitriptyline (39.0%), and tramadol (11.0%). Most wait 3-6 months before making changes when a neuromodulator is successful, then wean to the lowest possible cough-controlling dose (68.3%) or taper off completely (24.4%). When a neuromodulator fails: 43.9% wean and try another neuromodulator; others shift to a superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) block (24.4%). When cough recurs almost immediately after weaning an effective neuromodulator, most will re-initiate it again (97.6% likely or highly likely). If the cough recurs in the future, typical practice includes reinitiating the same prior effective neuromodulator at its previously tolerated effective dose (40.5%) or re-titrating to the new effective dose needed (51.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laryngologists routinely prescribe neuromodulators for unexplained and refractory chronic cough. Gabapentin and amitriptyline are the preferred first-line agents, generally titrated to maximal effect, balancing against side effects. A low threshold to reinitiate previously effective neuromodulators exists when cough recurs. If an initial neuromodulator is unsuccessful, either a different neuromodulator or a SLN block is considered.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 5: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practice Trends in Laryngology: Neuromodulators for Treatment of Chronic Cough.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher D Dwyer, Michael M Johns, Jennifer J Shin, Thomas L Carroll\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.32109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess practice trends among laryngologists within the United States surrounding neuromodulator use for chronic cough treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anonymous 29-item survey comprised of a mixture of multiple choice, Likert scale, and free-text answers was electronically distributed to practicing laryngologists in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five laryngologists from 26 states responded. The majority (96.5%) prescribe neuromodulators for chronic cough and are the preferred first-line treatment for refractory explained chronic cough (37.8%) and unexplained chronic cough (50.6%). Gabapentin (97.6%), amitriptyline (91.5%), and tramadol (73.2%) are the most used. The preferred first-line drugs were also gabapentin (45.1%), amitriptyline (39.0%), and tramadol (11.0%). Most wait 3-6 months before making changes when a neuromodulator is successful, then wean to the lowest possible cough-controlling dose (68.3%) or taper off completely (24.4%). When a neuromodulator fails: 43.9% wean and try another neuromodulator; others shift to a superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) block (24.4%). When cough recurs almost immediately after weaning an effective neuromodulator, most will re-initiate it again (97.6% likely or highly likely). If the cough recurs in the future, typical practice includes reinitiating the same prior effective neuromodulator at its previously tolerated effective dose (40.5%) or re-titrating to the new effective dose needed (51.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laryngologists routinely prescribe neuromodulators for unexplained and refractory chronic cough. Gabapentin and amitriptyline are the preferred first-line agents, generally titrated to maximal effect, balancing against side effects. A low threshold to reinitiate previously effective neuromodulators exists when cough recurs. If an initial neuromodulator is unsuccessful, either a different neuromodulator or a SLN block is considered.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 5: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32109\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估美国喉科医生在慢性咳嗽治疗中使用神经调节剂的实践趋势。方法:由多项选择、李克特量表和自由文本答案组成的29项匿名调查以电子方式分发给美国的执业喉科医生。结果:来自26个州的85名喉科医生做出了回应。大多数(96.5%)患者使用神经调节剂治疗慢性咳嗽,是难治性慢性咳嗽(37.8%)和不明原因慢性咳嗽(50.6%)的首选一线治疗方法。加巴喷丁(97.6%)、阿米替林(91.5%)和曲马多(73.2%)使用率最高。首选一线药物还有加巴喷丁(45.1%)、阿米替林(39.0%)和曲马多(11.0%)。大多数人在神经调节剂成功后等待3-6个月再进行改变,然后停止使用尽可能低的咳嗽控制剂量(68.3%)或完全逐渐减少(24.4%)。当一种神经调节剂失效时:43.9%的人放弃并尝试另一种神经调节剂;其他转移到喉上神经(SLN)阻滞(24.4%)。当在停用有效的神经调节剂后几乎立即咳嗽时,大多数人会再次咳嗽(97.6%的可能性或极有可能)。如果将来咳嗽复发,典型的做法包括以先前耐受的有效剂量(40.5%)重新启动相同的先前有效神经调节剂,或重新滴定到所需的新有效剂量(51.9%)。结论:对于不明原因的难治性慢性咳嗽,喉科医生通常会开神经调节剂。加巴喷丁和阿米替林是首选的一线药物,通常滴定到最大效果,平衡副作用。当咳嗽复发时,重新启动先前有效的神经调节剂的阈值很低。如果初始神经调节剂不成功,则考虑使用不同的神经调节剂或SLN阻滞。证据等级:5;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practice Trends in Laryngology: Neuromodulators for Treatment of Chronic Cough.

Objectives: Assess practice trends among laryngologists within the United States surrounding neuromodulator use for chronic cough treatment.

Methods: Anonymous 29-item survey comprised of a mixture of multiple choice, Likert scale, and free-text answers was electronically distributed to practicing laryngologists in the United States.

Results: Eighty-five laryngologists from 26 states responded. The majority (96.5%) prescribe neuromodulators for chronic cough and are the preferred first-line treatment for refractory explained chronic cough (37.8%) and unexplained chronic cough (50.6%). Gabapentin (97.6%), amitriptyline (91.5%), and tramadol (73.2%) are the most used. The preferred first-line drugs were also gabapentin (45.1%), amitriptyline (39.0%), and tramadol (11.0%). Most wait 3-6 months before making changes when a neuromodulator is successful, then wean to the lowest possible cough-controlling dose (68.3%) or taper off completely (24.4%). When a neuromodulator fails: 43.9% wean and try another neuromodulator; others shift to a superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) block (24.4%). When cough recurs almost immediately after weaning an effective neuromodulator, most will re-initiate it again (97.6% likely or highly likely). If the cough recurs in the future, typical practice includes reinitiating the same prior effective neuromodulator at its previously tolerated effective dose (40.5%) or re-titrating to the new effective dose needed (51.9%).

Conclusions: Laryngologists routinely prescribe neuromodulators for unexplained and refractory chronic cough. Gabapentin and amitriptyline are the preferred first-line agents, generally titrated to maximal effect, balancing against side effects. A low threshold to reinitiate previously effective neuromodulators exists when cough recurs. If an initial neuromodulator is unsuccessful, either a different neuromodulator or a SLN block is considered.

Level of evidence: 5:

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信