{"title":"单侧与双侧机器人辅助下经皮后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的比较。","authors":"Ruoyu Yang, Zhiwei Huang, Shanzhong Shao, Jinrun Liu, Shuyang Xia, Wei Li, Yinshun Zhang, Jun Qian, Fulong Dong, Cailiang Shen, Hui Tao","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the efficacy and safety of unilateral and bilateral robot-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty (RAPKP) in treating thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our study retrospectively analyzed 78 patients (unilateral group: 48, bilateral group: 30) with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture treated with RAPKP from January 2020 to July 2022. The operation time, X-ray exposure time, bone cement volume, postoperative bone cement distribution, preoperative and postoperative pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI), Cobb angle, vertebral height, bone cement leakage, adjacent vertebral fracture, and postoperative computed tomography (CT) in both groups were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All patients were successfully treated with RAPKP and followed up for 19.90 ± 5.38 months. Our results showed that the VAS core, ODI, vertebral height, and Cobb angle at postoperative follow-up were significantly improved in both groups compared to the preoperative period (<em>P</em> < 0.05). The operation time in the bilateral group (46.20 ± 6.89 minutes) was not statistically different from the unilateral group (42.54 ± 10.16 minutes) (<em>P</em> > 0.05), while the volume of bone cement injected was significantly more in the bilateral group (5.93 ± 1.81 mL) than in the unilateral group (4.73 ± 0.51 mL) (<em>P</em> < 0.05). In addition, the distribution of bone cement in the bilateral group was significantly better than that in the unilateral group (<em>P</em> < 0.05). There were no significant differences in X-ray exposure dose between the 2 groups (<em>P</em> > 0.05). Bone cement leaked in 9 cases (18.75%) in the unilateral group and 6 cases (20.00%) in the bilateral group (<em>P</em> > 0.05). No neurovascular injury or infection occurred. There were 8 cases (16.67%) of adjacent vertebral fracture in the unilateral group and 4 cases (13.33%) in the bilateral group (<em>P</em> > 0.05). Postoperative CT ratios of adjacent vertebrae (operated vertebra/upper adjacent vertebra: unilateral: 10.65 ± 2.7, bilateral: 11.32 ± 3.1; operated vertebra/lower adjacent vertebra: unilateral: 11.67 ± 3.0, bilateral: 12.48 ± 2.9) (<em>P</em> > 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Unilateral or bilateral RAPKP improves patients’ VAS, ODI, sagittal index, and Cobb angle. Unilateral RAPKP possesses the advantage of fewer puncture injuries. However, bilateral RAPKP has better postoperative cement distribution, and we believe that bilateral RAPKP has a better long-term prognosis, so we recommend bilateral RAPKP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 123911"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Kyphoplasty in Treating Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture\",\"authors\":\"Ruoyu Yang, Zhiwei Huang, Shanzhong Shao, Jinrun Liu, Shuyang Xia, Wei Li, Yinshun Zhang, Jun Qian, Fulong Dong, Cailiang Shen, Hui Tao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the efficacy and safety of unilateral and bilateral robot-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty (RAPKP) in treating thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our study retrospectively analyzed 78 patients (unilateral group: 48, bilateral group: 30) with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture treated with RAPKP from January 2020 to July 2022. The operation time, X-ray exposure time, bone cement volume, postoperative bone cement distribution, preoperative and postoperative pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI), Cobb angle, vertebral height, bone cement leakage, adjacent vertebral fracture, and postoperative computed tomography (CT) in both groups were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All patients were successfully treated with RAPKP and followed up for 19.90 ± 5.38 months. Our results showed that the VAS core, ODI, vertebral height, and Cobb angle at postoperative follow-up were significantly improved in both groups compared to the preoperative period (<em>P</em> < 0.05). The operation time in the bilateral group (46.20 ± 6.89 minutes) was not statistically different from the unilateral group (42.54 ± 10.16 minutes) (<em>P</em> > 0.05), while the volume of bone cement injected was significantly more in the bilateral group (5.93 ± 1.81 mL) than in the unilateral group (4.73 ± 0.51 mL) (<em>P</em> < 0.05). In addition, the distribution of bone cement in the bilateral group was significantly better than that in the unilateral group (<em>P</em> < 0.05). There were no significant differences in X-ray exposure dose between the 2 groups (<em>P</em> > 0.05). Bone cement leaked in 9 cases (18.75%) in the unilateral group and 6 cases (20.00%) in the bilateral group (<em>P</em> > 0.05). No neurovascular injury or infection occurred. There were 8 cases (16.67%) of adjacent vertebral fracture in the unilateral group and 4 cases (13.33%) in the bilateral group (<em>P</em> > 0.05). Postoperative CT ratios of adjacent vertebrae (operated vertebra/upper adjacent vertebra: unilateral: 10.65 ± 2.7, bilateral: 11.32 ± 3.1; operated vertebra/lower adjacent vertebra: unilateral: 11.67 ± 3.0, bilateral: 12.48 ± 2.9) (<em>P</em> > 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Unilateral or bilateral RAPKP improves patients’ VAS, ODI, sagittal index, and Cobb angle. Unilateral RAPKP possesses the advantage of fewer puncture injuries. However, bilateral RAPKP has better postoperative cement distribution, and we believe that bilateral RAPKP has a better long-term prognosis, so we recommend bilateral RAPKP.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123911\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025002670\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025002670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Kyphoplasty in Treating Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture
Objective
To investigate the efficacy and safety of unilateral and bilateral robot-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty (RAPKP) in treating thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
Methods
Our study retrospectively analyzed 78 patients (unilateral group: 48, bilateral group: 30) with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture treated with RAPKP from January 2020 to July 2022. The operation time, X-ray exposure time, bone cement volume, postoperative bone cement distribution, preoperative and postoperative pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI), Cobb angle, vertebral height, bone cement leakage, adjacent vertebral fracture, and postoperative computed tomography (CT) in both groups were recorded.
Results
All patients were successfully treated with RAPKP and followed up for 19.90 ± 5.38 months. Our results showed that the VAS core, ODI, vertebral height, and Cobb angle at postoperative follow-up were significantly improved in both groups compared to the preoperative period (P < 0.05). The operation time in the bilateral group (46.20 ± 6.89 minutes) was not statistically different from the unilateral group (42.54 ± 10.16 minutes) (P > 0.05), while the volume of bone cement injected was significantly more in the bilateral group (5.93 ± 1.81 mL) than in the unilateral group (4.73 ± 0.51 mL) (P < 0.05). In addition, the distribution of bone cement in the bilateral group was significantly better than that in the unilateral group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in X-ray exposure dose between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Bone cement leaked in 9 cases (18.75%) in the unilateral group and 6 cases (20.00%) in the bilateral group (P > 0.05). No neurovascular injury or infection occurred. There were 8 cases (16.67%) of adjacent vertebral fracture in the unilateral group and 4 cases (13.33%) in the bilateral group (P > 0.05). Postoperative CT ratios of adjacent vertebrae (operated vertebra/upper adjacent vertebra: unilateral: 10.65 ± 2.7, bilateral: 11.32 ± 3.1; operated vertebra/lower adjacent vertebra: unilateral: 11.67 ± 3.0, bilateral: 12.48 ± 2.9) (P > 0.05).
Conclusions
Unilateral or bilateral RAPKP improves patients’ VAS, ODI, sagittal index, and Cobb angle. Unilateral RAPKP possesses the advantage of fewer puncture injuries. However, bilateral RAPKP has better postoperative cement distribution, and we believe that bilateral RAPKP has a better long-term prognosis, so we recommend bilateral RAPKP.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS