Francesca Caumo, Gisella Gennaro, Alessandra Ravaioli, Enrica Baldan, Elisabetta Bezzon, Silvia Bottin, Paolo Carlevaris, Lina Ciampani, Alessandro Coran, Chiara Dal Bosco, Sara Del Genio, Alessia Dalla Pietà, Fabio Falcini, Federico Maggetto, Giuseppe Manco, Tiziana Masiero, Maria Petrioli, Ilaria Polico, Tiziana Pisapia, Martina Zemella, Manuel Zorzi, Stefania Zovato, Lauro Bucchi
{"title":"基于风险和密度的个性化筛查:RIBBS 研究的患病率数据。","authors":"Francesca Caumo, Gisella Gennaro, Alessandra Ravaioli, Enrica Baldan, Elisabetta Bezzon, Silvia Bottin, Paolo Carlevaris, Lina Ciampani, Alessandro Coran, Chiara Dal Bosco, Sara Del Genio, Alessia Dalla Pietà, Fabio Falcini, Federico Maggetto, Giuseppe Manco, Tiziana Masiero, Maria Petrioli, Ilaria Polico, Tiziana Pisapia, Martina Zemella, Manuel Zorzi, Stefania Zovato, Lauro Bucchi","doi":"10.1007/s11547-025-01981-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To present the prevalence screening results of the RIsk-Based Breast Screening (RIBBS) study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05675085), a quasi-experimental population-based study evaluating a personalized screening model for women aged 45-49. This model uses digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and stratifies participants by risk and breast density, incorporating tailored screening intervals with or without supplemental imaging (ultrasound, US, and breast MRI), with the goal of reducing advanced breast cancer (BC) incidence compared to annual digital mammography (DM).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An interventional cohort of 10,269 women aged 45 was enrolled (January 2020-December 2021. Participants underwent DBT and completed a BC risk questionnaire. Volumetric breast density and lifetime risk were used to assign five subgroups to tailored screening regimens: low-risk low-density (LR-LD), low-risk high-density (LR-HD), intermediate-risk low-density (IR-LD), intermediate-risk high-density (IR-HD), and high-risk (HR). Screening performance was compared with an observational control cohort of 43,838 women undergoing annual DM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to LR-LD, intermediate-risk groups showed a 4.9- (IR-LD) and 4.6-fold (IR-HD) higher prevalence of BC, driven by a 7.1- and 7.1-fold higher prevalence of pT1c tumors. The interventional cohort had lower recall rate (rate ratio, 0.5), higher surgery rate (1.9) and increased prevalence of DCIS (2.9), pT1c (2.3) and grade 3 tumors (2.4), compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence screening demonstrated the feasibility of using DBT and -in high-density subgroups- supplemental US. The stratification criteria effectively identified subpopulations with different BC prevalence. Increasing the detection rate of pT1c tumors is not sufficient but necessary to achieve a reduction in advanced BC incidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized screening based on risk and density: prevalence data from the RIBBS study.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Caumo, Gisella Gennaro, Alessandra Ravaioli, Enrica Baldan, Elisabetta Bezzon, Silvia Bottin, Paolo Carlevaris, Lina Ciampani, Alessandro Coran, Chiara Dal Bosco, Sara Del Genio, Alessia Dalla Pietà, Fabio Falcini, Federico Maggetto, Giuseppe Manco, Tiziana Masiero, Maria Petrioli, Ilaria Polico, Tiziana Pisapia, Martina Zemella, Manuel Zorzi, Stefania Zovato, Lauro Bucchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11547-025-01981-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To present the prevalence screening results of the RIsk-Based Breast Screening (RIBBS) study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05675085), a quasi-experimental population-based study evaluating a personalized screening model for women aged 45-49. This model uses digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and stratifies participants by risk and breast density, incorporating tailored screening intervals with or without supplemental imaging (ultrasound, US, and breast MRI), with the goal of reducing advanced breast cancer (BC) incidence compared to annual digital mammography (DM).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An interventional cohort of 10,269 women aged 45 was enrolled (January 2020-December 2021. Participants underwent DBT and completed a BC risk questionnaire. Volumetric breast density and lifetime risk were used to assign five subgroups to tailored screening regimens: low-risk low-density (LR-LD), low-risk high-density (LR-HD), intermediate-risk low-density (IR-LD), intermediate-risk high-density (IR-HD), and high-risk (HR). Screening performance was compared with an observational control cohort of 43,838 women undergoing annual DM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to LR-LD, intermediate-risk groups showed a 4.9- (IR-LD) and 4.6-fold (IR-HD) higher prevalence of BC, driven by a 7.1- and 7.1-fold higher prevalence of pT1c tumors. The interventional cohort had lower recall rate (rate ratio, 0.5), higher surgery rate (1.9) and increased prevalence of DCIS (2.9), pT1c (2.3) and grade 3 tumors (2.4), compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence screening demonstrated the feasibility of using DBT and -in high-density subgroups- supplemental US. The stratification criteria effectively identified subpopulations with different BC prevalence. Increasing the detection rate of pT1c tumors is not sufficient but necessary to achieve a reduction in advanced BC incidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-01981-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-01981-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:介绍基于 RIsk 的乳腺筛查 (RIBBS) 研究(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05675085)的筛查结果,该研究是一项基于人群的准实验性研究,评估了针对 45-49 岁女性的个性化筛查模式。该模式使用数字乳腺断层扫描(DBT),并根据风险和乳腺密度对参与者进行分层,结合有或无补充成像(超声波、US 和乳腺 MRI)的定制筛查间隔,目的是与每年一次的数字乳腺 X 线照相术(DM)相比,降低晚期乳腺癌(BC)的发病率:2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月,10269 名 45 岁女性加入了干预队列。参与者接受了 DBT 并填写了 BC 风险问卷。乳腺体积密度和终生风险被用于为五个亚组分配定制筛查方案:低风险低密度(LR-LD)、低风险高密度(LR-HD)、中风险低密度(IR-LD)、中风险高密度(IR-HD)和高风险(HR)。筛查结果与43838名接受年度DM检查的女性组成的观察性对照组进行了比较:与 LR-LD 相比,中危人群的 BC 患病率分别高出 4.9 倍(IR-LD)和 4.6 倍(IR-HD),其中 pT1c 肿瘤的患病率分别高出 7.1 倍和 7.1 倍。与对照组相比,干预组的召回率较低(比率比为0.5),手术率较高(1.9),DCIS(2.9)、pT1c(2.3)和3级肿瘤(2.4)的患病率较高:患病率筛查证明了在高密度亚组中使用DBT和补充US的可行性。分层标准有效识别了不同 BC 患病率的亚群。提高 pT1c 肿瘤的检出率对于降低晚期 BC 发病率是不够的,但却是必要的。
Personalized screening based on risk and density: prevalence data from the RIBBS study.
Purpose: To present the prevalence screening results of the RIsk-Based Breast Screening (RIBBS) study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05675085), a quasi-experimental population-based study evaluating a personalized screening model for women aged 45-49. This model uses digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and stratifies participants by risk and breast density, incorporating tailored screening intervals with or without supplemental imaging (ultrasound, US, and breast MRI), with the goal of reducing advanced breast cancer (BC) incidence compared to annual digital mammography (DM).
Materials and methods: An interventional cohort of 10,269 women aged 45 was enrolled (January 2020-December 2021. Participants underwent DBT and completed a BC risk questionnaire. Volumetric breast density and lifetime risk were used to assign five subgroups to tailored screening regimens: low-risk low-density (LR-LD), low-risk high-density (LR-HD), intermediate-risk low-density (IR-LD), intermediate-risk high-density (IR-HD), and high-risk (HR). Screening performance was compared with an observational control cohort of 43,838 women undergoing annual DM.
Results: Compared to LR-LD, intermediate-risk groups showed a 4.9- (IR-LD) and 4.6-fold (IR-HD) higher prevalence of BC, driven by a 7.1- and 7.1-fold higher prevalence of pT1c tumors. The interventional cohort had lower recall rate (rate ratio, 0.5), higher surgery rate (1.9) and increased prevalence of DCIS (2.9), pT1c (2.3) and grade 3 tumors (2.4), compared to controls.
Conclusion: The prevalence screening demonstrated the feasibility of using DBT and -in high-density subgroups- supplemental US. The stratification criteria effectively identified subpopulations with different BC prevalence. Increasing the detection rate of pT1c tumors is not sufficient but necessary to achieve a reduction in advanced BC incidence.
期刊介绍:
Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.