Cemiplimab单药用于PD-L1表达≥50%的晚期NSCLC患者的一线治疗:EMPOWER-Lung 1 的 5 年疗效。

IF 21 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Saadettin Kilickap, Ana Baramidze, Ahmet Sezer, Mustafa Özgüroğlu, Mahmut Gumus, Igor Bondarenko, Miranda Gogishvili, Marina Nechaeva, Michael Schenker, Irfan Cicin, Ho Gwo Fuang, Yaroslav Kulyaba, Kasimova Zyuhal, Roxana-Ioana Scheusan, Marina Chiara Garassino, Yuntong Li, Cong Zhu, Manika Kaul, Javier Perez, Frank Seebach, Israel Lowy, Jean-Francois Pouliot, Eric Kim, Heather Magnan
{"title":"Cemiplimab单药用于PD-L1表达≥50%的晚期NSCLC患者的一线治疗:EMPOWER-Lung 1 的 5 年疗效。","authors":"Saadettin Kilickap, Ana Baramidze, Ahmet Sezer, Mustafa Özgüroğlu, Mahmut Gumus, Igor Bondarenko, Miranda Gogishvili, Marina Nechaeva, Michael Schenker, Irfan Cicin, Ho Gwo Fuang, Yaroslav Kulyaba, Kasimova Zyuhal, Roxana-Ioana Scheusan, Marina Chiara Garassino, Yuntong Li, Cong Zhu, Manika Kaul, Javier Perez, Frank Seebach, Israel Lowy, Jean-Francois Pouliot, Eric Kim, Heather Magnan","doi":"10.1016/j.jtho.2025.03.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Earlier results from the phase 3 EMPOWER-Lung 1 trial demonstrated significant survival benefits and a generally acceptable safety profile of first-line cemiplimab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in ≥50% of tumor cells and no EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 aberrations. Here, we report the 5-year outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomized 1:1 to cemiplimab 350 mg intravenous every 3 weeks for 2 years or investigator's choice of chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 712 patients were randomized to cemiplimab (n = 357) or chemotherapy (n = 355). Median duration of follow-up was 59.6 months (interquartile range: 55.1-66.7 months) at the data cutoff (January 16, 2024). In patients with verified PD-L1 ≥50% (n = 565), median OS was 26.1 months for cemiplimab vs. 13.3 months for chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.72); median PFS was 8.1 months versus 5.3 months (HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.41-0.61); the objective response rate was 46.5% versus 20.6%. The 5-year OS probability was 29.0% for cemiplimab and 15.0% for chemotherapy. Improved survival outcomes were observed with both squamous and non-squamous histology, and increasing activity of cemiplimab was correlated with higher PD-L1 expression, with the highest PD-L1 expression having the best outcome. The safety profile remains consistent with previous results. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18.3% of patients for cemiplimab and 39.9% for chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At 5-year follow-up, first-line cemiplimab monotherapy continued to show durable clinical benefits versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥50%. Patients with PD-L1 ≥90% derived the largest clinical benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":17515,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cemiplimab Monotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Patients with Advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 Expression ≥50%: 5-Year Outcomes of EMPOWER-Lung 1.\",\"authors\":\"Saadettin Kilickap, Ana Baramidze, Ahmet Sezer, Mustafa Özgüroğlu, Mahmut Gumus, Igor Bondarenko, Miranda Gogishvili, Marina Nechaeva, Michael Schenker, Irfan Cicin, Ho Gwo Fuang, Yaroslav Kulyaba, Kasimova Zyuhal, Roxana-Ioana Scheusan, Marina Chiara Garassino, Yuntong Li, Cong Zhu, Manika Kaul, Javier Perez, Frank Seebach, Israel Lowy, Jean-Francois Pouliot, Eric Kim, Heather Magnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtho.2025.03.033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Earlier results from the phase 3 EMPOWER-Lung 1 trial demonstrated significant survival benefits and a generally acceptable safety profile of first-line cemiplimab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in ≥50% of tumor cells and no EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 aberrations. Here, we report the 5-year outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomized 1:1 to cemiplimab 350 mg intravenous every 3 weeks for 2 years or investigator's choice of chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 712 patients were randomized to cemiplimab (n = 357) or chemotherapy (n = 355). Median duration of follow-up was 59.6 months (interquartile range: 55.1-66.7 months) at the data cutoff (January 16, 2024). In patients with verified PD-L1 ≥50% (n = 565), median OS was 26.1 months for cemiplimab vs. 13.3 months for chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.72); median PFS was 8.1 months versus 5.3 months (HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.41-0.61); the objective response rate was 46.5% versus 20.6%. The 5-year OS probability was 29.0% for cemiplimab and 15.0% for chemotherapy. Improved survival outcomes were observed with both squamous and non-squamous histology, and increasing activity of cemiplimab was correlated with higher PD-L1 expression, with the highest PD-L1 expression having the best outcome. The safety profile remains consistent with previous results. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18.3% of patients for cemiplimab and 39.9% for chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At 5-year follow-up, first-line cemiplimab monotherapy continued to show durable clinical benefits versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥50%. Patients with PD-L1 ≥90% derived the largest clinical benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2025.03.033\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2025.03.033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cemiplimab Monotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Patients with Advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 Expression ≥50%: 5-Year Outcomes of EMPOWER-Lung 1.

Introduction: Earlier results from the phase 3 EMPOWER-Lung 1 trial demonstrated significant survival benefits and a generally acceptable safety profile of first-line cemiplimab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in ≥50% of tumor cells and no EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 aberrations. Here, we report the 5-year outcomes.

Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to cemiplimab 350 mg intravenous every 3 weeks for 2 years or investigator's choice of chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: A total of 712 patients were randomized to cemiplimab (n = 357) or chemotherapy (n = 355). Median duration of follow-up was 59.6 months (interquartile range: 55.1-66.7 months) at the data cutoff (January 16, 2024). In patients with verified PD-L1 ≥50% (n = 565), median OS was 26.1 months for cemiplimab vs. 13.3 months for chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.72); median PFS was 8.1 months versus 5.3 months (HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.41-0.61); the objective response rate was 46.5% versus 20.6%. The 5-year OS probability was 29.0% for cemiplimab and 15.0% for chemotherapy. Improved survival outcomes were observed with both squamous and non-squamous histology, and increasing activity of cemiplimab was correlated with higher PD-L1 expression, with the highest PD-L1 expression having the best outcome. The safety profile remains consistent with previous results. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18.3% of patients for cemiplimab and 39.9% for chemotherapy.

Conclusions: At 5-year follow-up, first-line cemiplimab monotherapy continued to show durable clinical benefits versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥50%. Patients with PD-L1 ≥90% derived the largest clinical benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Journal of Thoracic Oncology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
36.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1406
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Oncology (JTO), the official journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer,is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to the prevention, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of all thoracic malignancies.The readship includes epidemiologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, thoracic surgeons, pulmonologists, radiologists, pathologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and research scientists with a special interest in thoracic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信