现代妇科手术的发病率和死亡率。

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Claudia Mallory, Myriam Girgis, Wei How Lim
{"title":"现代妇科手术的发病率和死亡率。","authors":"Claudia Mallory, Myriam Girgis, Wei How Lim","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.25.05620-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical audits are quality improvement initiatives developed to enhance the quality of surgical care and to highlight sub-optimal local practices. The aim of this audit was to collate necessary data to track and analyze gynecological surgery complications for quality assurance in operative care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of all patients who underwent both elective and emergency gynecological surgery across two health care institutions was undertaken over a 10-year period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of complications and mortality was low in a review of over 9000 gynecological surgeries. Patients who underwent major surgeries such as operative laparoscopies and hysterectomies, which made up of 30% of all surgeries, had a longer postoperative mean length of stay - one variable noted was majority of these patients live in remote areas. Other morbidities such as postoperative pneumonia, bradycardia and hypotension related intensive care admissions were associated with obesity and medical co-morbidities. There was no statistical difference in operative complication between elective and emergency surgeries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The morbidity and mortality associated with modern gynecological surgery occurred infrequently, especially postoperative venous thromboembolism and wound site infection. Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program and an increasing trend in minimally invasive surgery were key practices contributing to this low rate. Future assessments should include comparison of outcomes against local and international outcome databases such as the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morbidity and mortality in modern gynecologic surgical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Mallory, Myriam Girgis, Wei How Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-606X.25.05620-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical audits are quality improvement initiatives developed to enhance the quality of surgical care and to highlight sub-optimal local practices. The aim of this audit was to collate necessary data to track and analyze gynecological surgery complications for quality assurance in operative care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of all patients who underwent both elective and emergency gynecological surgery across two health care institutions was undertaken over a 10-year period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of complications and mortality was low in a review of over 9000 gynecological surgeries. Patients who underwent major surgeries such as operative laparoscopies and hysterectomies, which made up of 30% of all surgeries, had a longer postoperative mean length of stay - one variable noted was majority of these patients live in remote areas. Other morbidities such as postoperative pneumonia, bradycardia and hypotension related intensive care admissions were associated with obesity and medical co-morbidities. There was no statistical difference in operative complication between elective and emergency surgeries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The morbidity and mortality associated with modern gynecological surgery occurred infrequently, especially postoperative venous thromboembolism and wound site infection. Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program and an increasing trend in minimally invasive surgery were key practices contributing to this low rate. Future assessments should include comparison of outcomes against local and international outcome databases such as the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for further evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.25.05620-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.25.05620-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术审核是一种质量改进措施,旨在提高手术护理质量,并突出当地的次优做法。本次审核旨在整理必要的数据,跟踪和分析妇科手术并发症,以保证手术护理质量:方法:对两家医疗机构在 10 年内接受妇科择期手术和急诊手术的所有患者进行回顾性研究:结果:在对 9000 多例妇科手术的回顾研究中,并发症和死亡率较低。接受腹腔镜手术和子宫切除术等大型手术的患者(占所有手术的 30%)术后平均住院时间较长,其中一个变量是这些患者大多居住在偏远地区。其他发病率,如术后肺炎、心动过缓和低血压导致的重症监护入院与肥胖和并发症有关。择期手术和急诊手术在手术并发症方面没有统计学差异:结论:现代妇科手术的发病率和死亡率较低,尤其是术后静脉血栓栓塞和伤口感染。术后恢复强化计划的实施和微创手术的发展趋势是导致低死亡率的主要原因。未来的评估应包括将结果与当地和国际结果数据库(如美国外科学院国家外科质量改进计划)进行比较,以便进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Morbidity and mortality in modern gynecologic surgical practice.

Background: Surgical audits are quality improvement initiatives developed to enhance the quality of surgical care and to highlight sub-optimal local practices. The aim of this audit was to collate necessary data to track and analyze gynecological surgery complications for quality assurance in operative care.

Methods: A retrospective study of all patients who underwent both elective and emergency gynecological surgery across two health care institutions was undertaken over a 10-year period.

Results: The incidence of complications and mortality was low in a review of over 9000 gynecological surgeries. Patients who underwent major surgeries such as operative laparoscopies and hysterectomies, which made up of 30% of all surgeries, had a longer postoperative mean length of stay - one variable noted was majority of these patients live in remote areas. Other morbidities such as postoperative pneumonia, bradycardia and hypotension related intensive care admissions were associated with obesity and medical co-morbidities. There was no statistical difference in operative complication between elective and emergency surgeries.

Conclusions: The morbidity and mortality associated with modern gynecological surgery occurred infrequently, especially postoperative venous thromboembolism and wound site infection. Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program and an increasing trend in minimally invasive surgery were key practices contributing to this low rate. Future assessments should include comparison of outcomes against local and international outcome databases such as the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for further evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
191
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信