农地产权制度改革与粮食生产弹性:基于中国 "三权分置 "改革的经验证据。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0319387
Zeng Wei, Jiquan Peng, Yan Zhao, Xijian Li, Cheng Wang
{"title":"农地产权制度改革与粮食生产弹性:基于中国 \"三权分置 \"改革的经验证据。","authors":"Zeng Wei, Jiquan Peng, Yan Zhao, Xijian Li, Cheng Wang","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0319387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The latest reform in China's agricultural land rights system has implemented the \"Three Rights Separation\" reform, distinguishing between ownership rights, contract rights, and management rights of rural land. This reform is a significant step taken by the Chinese government to ensure a rational allocation of agricultural land resources, contributing greatly to enhancing food production resilience and promoting food security. This paper analyzes panel data from 30 Chinese provinces from 2005 to 2021 to assess the resilience levels in grain production. It utilizes a multi-period Difference-in-Differences model to examine the effects of the separation of three rights of agricultural land on this resilience, including their mechanisms of action. The findings reveal that(1)although the resilience of grain production in China has progressively improved over the study period, it remains low, indicating substantial potential for enhancement;(2)The separation of three rights of agricultural land significantly boosts the resilience of grain production, a conclusion corroborated by robustness tests;(3)The analysis shows that the policy promotes resilience by facilitating land transfer and boosting investments in agricultural productivity;(4)Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the policy's impact is more pronounced in major grain-producing areas and central regions, with stronger effects observed in northern wheat-growing areas compared to southern rice-growing regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 3","pages":"e0319387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reform of agricultural land property rights system and grain production resilience: Empirical evidence based on China's \\\"Three Rights Separation\\\" reform.\",\"authors\":\"Zeng Wei, Jiquan Peng, Yan Zhao, Xijian Li, Cheng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0319387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The latest reform in China's agricultural land rights system has implemented the \\\"Three Rights Separation\\\" reform, distinguishing between ownership rights, contract rights, and management rights of rural land. This reform is a significant step taken by the Chinese government to ensure a rational allocation of agricultural land resources, contributing greatly to enhancing food production resilience and promoting food security. This paper analyzes panel data from 30 Chinese provinces from 2005 to 2021 to assess the resilience levels in grain production. It utilizes a multi-period Difference-in-Differences model to examine the effects of the separation of three rights of agricultural land on this resilience, including their mechanisms of action. The findings reveal that(1)although the resilience of grain production in China has progressively improved over the study period, it remains low, indicating substantial potential for enhancement;(2)The separation of three rights of agricultural land significantly boosts the resilience of grain production, a conclusion corroborated by robustness tests;(3)The analysis shows that the policy promotes resilience by facilitating land transfer and boosting investments in agricultural productivity;(4)Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the policy's impact is more pronounced in major grain-producing areas and central regions, with stronger effects observed in northern wheat-growing areas compared to southern rice-growing regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"e0319387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927886/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319387\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319387","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国最新的农地产权制度改革实行了 "三权分置",区分了农村土地的所有权、承包权和经营权。这项改革是中国政府为确保农地资源的合理配置而采取的重大举措,对增强粮食生产的抗风险能力和促进粮食安全做出了巨大贡献。本文分析了 2005 年至 2021 年中国 30 个省份的面板数据,以评估粮食生产的抗逆性水平。本文利用多期差分模型研究了农地三权分置对粮食生产抗逆性的影响及其作用机制。研究结果表明:(1)虽然中国粮食生产的抗逆性在研究期间逐步提高,但仍然较低,表明其抗逆性还有很大的提高空间;(2)农地三权分置显著提高了粮食生产的抗逆性,这一结论得到了稳健性检验的证实;(4)异质性分析表明,该政策对粮食主产区和中部地区的影响更为明显,北方小麦种植区的影响强于南方水稻种植区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reform of agricultural land property rights system and grain production resilience: Empirical evidence based on China's "Three Rights Separation" reform.

Reform of agricultural land property rights system and grain production resilience: Empirical evidence based on China's "Three Rights Separation" reform.

Reform of agricultural land property rights system and grain production resilience: Empirical evidence based on China's "Three Rights Separation" reform.

Reform of agricultural land property rights system and grain production resilience: Empirical evidence based on China's "Three Rights Separation" reform.

The latest reform in China's agricultural land rights system has implemented the "Three Rights Separation" reform, distinguishing between ownership rights, contract rights, and management rights of rural land. This reform is a significant step taken by the Chinese government to ensure a rational allocation of agricultural land resources, contributing greatly to enhancing food production resilience and promoting food security. This paper analyzes panel data from 30 Chinese provinces from 2005 to 2021 to assess the resilience levels in grain production. It utilizes a multi-period Difference-in-Differences model to examine the effects of the separation of three rights of agricultural land on this resilience, including their mechanisms of action. The findings reveal that(1)although the resilience of grain production in China has progressively improved over the study period, it remains low, indicating substantial potential for enhancement;(2)The separation of three rights of agricultural land significantly boosts the resilience of grain production, a conclusion corroborated by robustness tests;(3)The analysis shows that the policy promotes resilience by facilitating land transfer and boosting investments in agricultural productivity;(4)Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the policy's impact is more pronounced in major grain-producing areas and central regions, with stronger effects observed in northern wheat-growing areas compared to southern rice-growing regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信