Yaron Shoham , Lior Rosenberg , RP Narayan , Raphael Staubach , Ruzsena Bene , Mohan Kakola , Stan J. Monstrey , Yvonne Wilson , Manoj Jha , Giavonni M. Lewis , Shawn Larson , Adam J. Singer
{"title":"关于 NexoBrid 对烧伤儿童的疗效和安全性与标准护理相比的开放标签随机对照试验。","authors":"Yaron Shoham , Lior Rosenberg , RP Narayan , Raphael Staubach , Ruzsena Bene , Mohan Kakola , Stan J. Monstrey , Yvonne Wilson , Manoj Jha , Giavonni M. Lewis , Shawn Larson , Adam J. Singer","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an enzymatic bromelain-based debridement (BBD) agent (NexoBrid®) in children with deep thermal burns.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a multicenter, open-label, parallel design, randomized controlled trial at 36 burn centers in Europe, US, Israel and India. Main eligibility criteria included children 0–18 years old, suffering from deep thermal burns covering 1–30 % of their total body surface area. Patients were randomized to either BBD or standard of care (SOC) eschar removal methods. Primary endpoints included time to complete eschar removal (superiority), percentage of wound area surgically excised (superiority) and blinded 12 months follow-up assessment of cosmesis and function using the Modified Vancouver Scar Scale (MVSS, non-inferiority).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred and forty-five children were enrolled between 2015 and 2020 (last patient completed 12-month follow-up on April 2021); 72 were randomized to BBD and 73 to SOC. All three primary endpoints of the study were met. The median time to complete eschar removal was significantly lower in the BBD arm (1 vs. 6 days, <em>P</em> < 0.001). The mean [SD] percentage of wound area surgically excised was also significantly lower in the BBD arm (1.5 % [12.1 %] vs. 48.1 % [46.6 %], <em>P</em> < 0.001). Mean [SD] 12-month MVSS scores were 3.8 [2.9] and 4.9 [3.3] in the BBD and SOC arms, respectively (non-inferiority demonstrated at P < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups, and there were no significant safety issues or deaths during the trial.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BBD was demonstrated to be safe and effective in children. Its use lead to a shorter time to complete eschar removal, a reduction in excisional surgery and non-inferior cosmesis and function results as compared to SOC eschar removal methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"51 4","pages":"Article 107417"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open label randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of NexoBrid compared to standard of care in children with burns\",\"authors\":\"Yaron Shoham , Lior Rosenberg , RP Narayan , Raphael Staubach , Ruzsena Bene , Mohan Kakola , Stan J. Monstrey , Yvonne Wilson , Manoj Jha , Giavonni M. Lewis , Shawn Larson , Adam J. Singer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an enzymatic bromelain-based debridement (BBD) agent (NexoBrid®) in children with deep thermal burns.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a multicenter, open-label, parallel design, randomized controlled trial at 36 burn centers in Europe, US, Israel and India. Main eligibility criteria included children 0–18 years old, suffering from deep thermal burns covering 1–30 % of their total body surface area. Patients were randomized to either BBD or standard of care (SOC) eschar removal methods. Primary endpoints included time to complete eschar removal (superiority), percentage of wound area surgically excised (superiority) and blinded 12 months follow-up assessment of cosmesis and function using the Modified Vancouver Scar Scale (MVSS, non-inferiority).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred and forty-five children were enrolled between 2015 and 2020 (last patient completed 12-month follow-up on April 2021); 72 were randomized to BBD and 73 to SOC. All three primary endpoints of the study were met. The median time to complete eschar removal was significantly lower in the BBD arm (1 vs. 6 days, <em>P</em> < 0.001). The mean [SD] percentage of wound area surgically excised was also significantly lower in the BBD arm (1.5 % [12.1 %] vs. 48.1 % [46.6 %], <em>P</em> < 0.001). Mean [SD] 12-month MVSS scores were 3.8 [2.9] and 4.9 [3.3] in the BBD and SOC arms, respectively (non-inferiority demonstrated at P < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups, and there were no significant safety issues or deaths during the trial.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BBD was demonstrated to be safe and effective in children. Its use lead to a shorter time to complete eschar removal, a reduction in excisional surgery and non-inferior cosmesis and function results as compared to SOC eschar removal methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burns\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 107417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burns\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417925000464\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417925000464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Open label randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of NexoBrid compared to standard of care in children with burns
Objectives
This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an enzymatic bromelain-based debridement (BBD) agent (NexoBrid®) in children with deep thermal burns.
Methods
We conducted a multicenter, open-label, parallel design, randomized controlled trial at 36 burn centers in Europe, US, Israel and India. Main eligibility criteria included children 0–18 years old, suffering from deep thermal burns covering 1–30 % of their total body surface area. Patients were randomized to either BBD or standard of care (SOC) eschar removal methods. Primary endpoints included time to complete eschar removal (superiority), percentage of wound area surgically excised (superiority) and blinded 12 months follow-up assessment of cosmesis and function using the Modified Vancouver Scar Scale (MVSS, non-inferiority).
Results
One hundred and forty-five children were enrolled between 2015 and 2020 (last patient completed 12-month follow-up on April 2021); 72 were randomized to BBD and 73 to SOC. All three primary endpoints of the study were met. The median time to complete eschar removal was significantly lower in the BBD arm (1 vs. 6 days, P < 0.001). The mean [SD] percentage of wound area surgically excised was also significantly lower in the BBD arm (1.5 % [12.1 %] vs. 48.1 % [46.6 %], P < 0.001). Mean [SD] 12-month MVSS scores were 3.8 [2.9] and 4.9 [3.3] in the BBD and SOC arms, respectively (non-inferiority demonstrated at P < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups, and there were no significant safety issues or deaths during the trial.
Conclusions
BBD was demonstrated to be safe and effective in children. Its use lead to a shorter time to complete eschar removal, a reduction in excisional surgery and non-inferior cosmesis and function results as compared to SOC eschar removal methods.
期刊介绍:
Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice.
Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.