关于 NexoBrid 对烧伤儿童的疗效和安全性与标准护理相比的开放标签随机对照试验。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Burns Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2025.107417
Yaron Shoham , Lior Rosenberg , RP Narayan , Raphael Staubach , Ruzsena Bene , Mohan Kakola , Stan J. Monstrey , Yvonne Wilson , Manoj Jha , Giavonni M. Lewis , Shawn Larson , Adam J. Singer
{"title":"关于 NexoBrid 对烧伤儿童的疗效和安全性与标准护理相比的开放标签随机对照试验。","authors":"Yaron Shoham ,&nbsp;Lior Rosenberg ,&nbsp;RP Narayan ,&nbsp;Raphael Staubach ,&nbsp;Ruzsena Bene ,&nbsp;Mohan Kakola ,&nbsp;Stan J. Monstrey ,&nbsp;Yvonne Wilson ,&nbsp;Manoj Jha ,&nbsp;Giavonni M. Lewis ,&nbsp;Shawn Larson ,&nbsp;Adam J. Singer","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an enzymatic bromelain-based debridement (BBD) agent (NexoBrid®) in children with deep thermal burns.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a multicenter, open-label, parallel design, randomized controlled trial at 36 burn centers in Europe, US, Israel and India. Main eligibility criteria included children 0–18 years old, suffering from deep thermal burns covering 1–30 % of their total body surface area. Patients were randomized to either BBD or standard of care (SOC) eschar removal methods. Primary endpoints included time to complete eschar removal (superiority), percentage of wound area surgically excised (superiority) and blinded 12 months follow-up assessment of cosmesis and function using the Modified Vancouver Scar Scale (MVSS, non-inferiority).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred and forty-five children were enrolled between 2015 and 2020 (last patient completed 12-month follow-up on April 2021); 72 were randomized to BBD and 73 to SOC. All three primary endpoints of the study were met. The median time to complete eschar removal was significantly lower in the BBD arm (1 vs. 6 days, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The mean [SD] percentage of wound area surgically excised was also significantly lower in the BBD arm (1.5 % [12.1 %] vs. 48.1 % [46.6 %], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Mean [SD] 12-month MVSS scores were 3.8 [2.9] and 4.9 [3.3] in the BBD and SOC arms, respectively (non-inferiority demonstrated at P &lt; 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups, and there were no significant safety issues or deaths during the trial.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BBD was demonstrated to be safe and effective in children. Its use lead to a shorter time to complete eschar removal, a reduction in excisional surgery and non-inferior cosmesis and function results as compared to SOC eschar removal methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"51 4","pages":"Article 107417"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open label randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of NexoBrid compared to standard of care in children with burns\",\"authors\":\"Yaron Shoham ,&nbsp;Lior Rosenberg ,&nbsp;RP Narayan ,&nbsp;Raphael Staubach ,&nbsp;Ruzsena Bene ,&nbsp;Mohan Kakola ,&nbsp;Stan J. Monstrey ,&nbsp;Yvonne Wilson ,&nbsp;Manoj Jha ,&nbsp;Giavonni M. Lewis ,&nbsp;Shawn Larson ,&nbsp;Adam J. Singer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an enzymatic bromelain-based debridement (BBD) agent (NexoBrid®) in children with deep thermal burns.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a multicenter, open-label, parallel design, randomized controlled trial at 36 burn centers in Europe, US, Israel and India. Main eligibility criteria included children 0–18 years old, suffering from deep thermal burns covering 1–30 % of their total body surface area. Patients were randomized to either BBD or standard of care (SOC) eschar removal methods. Primary endpoints included time to complete eschar removal (superiority), percentage of wound area surgically excised (superiority) and blinded 12 months follow-up assessment of cosmesis and function using the Modified Vancouver Scar Scale (MVSS, non-inferiority).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred and forty-five children were enrolled between 2015 and 2020 (last patient completed 12-month follow-up on April 2021); 72 were randomized to BBD and 73 to SOC. All three primary endpoints of the study were met. The median time to complete eschar removal was significantly lower in the BBD arm (1 vs. 6 days, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The mean [SD] percentage of wound area surgically excised was also significantly lower in the BBD arm (1.5 % [12.1 %] vs. 48.1 % [46.6 %], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Mean [SD] 12-month MVSS scores were 3.8 [2.9] and 4.9 [3.3] in the BBD and SOC arms, respectively (non-inferiority demonstrated at P &lt; 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups, and there were no significant safety issues or deaths during the trial.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BBD was demonstrated to be safe and effective in children. Its use lead to a shorter time to complete eschar removal, a reduction in excisional surgery and non-inferior cosmesis and function results as compared to SOC eschar removal methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burns\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 107417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burns\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417925000464\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417925000464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open label randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of NexoBrid compared to standard of care in children with burns

Objectives

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an enzymatic bromelain-based debridement (BBD) agent (NexoBrid®) in children with deep thermal burns.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter, open-label, parallel design, randomized controlled trial at 36 burn centers in Europe, US, Israel and India. Main eligibility criteria included children 0–18 years old, suffering from deep thermal burns covering 1–30 % of their total body surface area. Patients were randomized to either BBD or standard of care (SOC) eschar removal methods. Primary endpoints included time to complete eschar removal (superiority), percentage of wound area surgically excised (superiority) and blinded 12 months follow-up assessment of cosmesis and function using the Modified Vancouver Scar Scale (MVSS, non-inferiority).

Results

One hundred and forty-five children were enrolled between 2015 and 2020 (last patient completed 12-month follow-up on April 2021); 72 were randomized to BBD and 73 to SOC. All three primary endpoints of the study were met. The median time to complete eschar removal was significantly lower in the BBD arm (1 vs. 6 days, P < 0.001). The mean [SD] percentage of wound area surgically excised was also significantly lower in the BBD arm (1.5 % [12.1 %] vs. 48.1 % [46.6 %], P < 0.001). Mean [SD] 12-month MVSS scores were 3.8 [2.9] and 4.9 [3.3] in the BBD and SOC arms, respectively (non-inferiority demonstrated at P < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups, and there were no significant safety issues or deaths during the trial.

Conclusions

BBD was demonstrated to be safe and effective in children. Its use lead to a shorter time to complete eschar removal, a reduction in excisional surgery and non-inferior cosmesis and function results as compared to SOC eschar removal methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Burns
Burns 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
304
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice. Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信