人格悖论":护理伙伴为痴呆症和大小便失禁患者提供支持的经验。

Vanessa Burholt, Yasmin Orton, Sharon A Awatere, Julie F Daltrey
{"title":"人格悖论\":护理伙伴为痴呆症和大小便失禁患者提供支持的经验。","authors":"Vanessa Burholt, Yasmin Orton, Sharon A Awatere, Julie F Daltrey","doi":"10.1177/14713012251329545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, 50 million people live with dementia and mostly receive care at home. Urinary, faecal and functional incontinence is common in this population and increases care demands. This study explores care partners' experiences managing continence care for people with dementia in Aotearoa New Zealand. The data are drawn from a cross-sectional qualitative study with 18 care partners of people with dementia and incontinence in mid and northern regions of Aotearoa New Zealand. Participants were interviewed face-to-face from June 2022 to April 2023. Data were analysed using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis. Six Generalised Experiential Themes emerged. Care partners engaged in autobiographical and biographical meaning-making to interpret behaviours and maintain the personhood of people with dementia, focusing on dignity, identity, and social inclusion. However, caregiving often undermined care partners' personhood due to the physical and emotional demands of continence care. Access to resources was challenging, and healthcare support was often perceived as inadequate. Some care partners' strategies to find meaning and joy in everyday life contributed to resilience, while others experienced stress, fatigue, and burnout. Care partners used personal knowledge to support personhood, especially in social engagement. Uncertainty in managing incontinence led to self-doubt, exacerbated by the medicalised nature of continence care, which involves intimate attention beyond typical caregiving. Timely, credible advice could reduce uncertainty, but many found seeking resources overwhelming. Balancing their own well-being with caregiving highlights the need for support systems addressing the requirements of both care partners and people with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251329545"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 'personhood paradox': Care partners' experiences supporting people with dementia and incontinence.\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Burholt, Yasmin Orton, Sharon A Awatere, Julie F Daltrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14713012251329545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Globally, 50 million people live with dementia and mostly receive care at home. Urinary, faecal and functional incontinence is common in this population and increases care demands. This study explores care partners' experiences managing continence care for people with dementia in Aotearoa New Zealand. The data are drawn from a cross-sectional qualitative study with 18 care partners of people with dementia and incontinence in mid and northern regions of Aotearoa New Zealand. Participants were interviewed face-to-face from June 2022 to April 2023. Data were analysed using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis. Six Generalised Experiential Themes emerged. Care partners engaged in autobiographical and biographical meaning-making to interpret behaviours and maintain the personhood of people with dementia, focusing on dignity, identity, and social inclusion. However, caregiving often undermined care partners' personhood due to the physical and emotional demands of continence care. Access to resources was challenging, and healthcare support was often perceived as inadequate. Some care partners' strategies to find meaning and joy in everyday life contributed to resilience, while others experienced stress, fatigue, and burnout. Care partners used personal knowledge to support personhood, especially in social engagement. Uncertainty in managing incontinence led to self-doubt, exacerbated by the medicalised nature of continence care, which involves intimate attention beyond typical caregiving. Timely, credible advice could reduce uncertainty, but many found seeking resources overwhelming. Balancing their own well-being with caregiving highlights the need for support systems addressing the requirements of both care partners and people with dementia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia (London, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"14713012251329545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251329545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251329545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球有5000万人患有痴呆症,他们大多在家中接受护理。尿失禁、大便失禁和功能性失禁在这一人群中很常见,增加了护理需求。本研究探讨护理伙伴的经验管理失禁护理的人与痴呆症在新西兰奥特罗阿。数据来自一项横断面定性研究,研究对象是新西兰奥特罗阿中部和北部地区18名痴呆症和尿失禁患者的护理伙伴。参与者在2022年6月至2023年4月期间接受了面对面的采访。数据分析采用解释现象学分析。六个概括的经验主题出现了。护理伙伴参与自传式和传记式意义创造,以解释痴呆症患者的行为并维护其人格,重点关注尊严、身份和社会包容。然而,由于自制护理的身体和情感需求,护理往往破坏了护理伙伴的人格。获得资源是一项挑战,保健支助往往被认为不足。一些护理伙伴在日常生活中寻找意义和快乐的策略有助于恢复,而另一些则经历了压力、疲劳和倦怠。护理伙伴利用个人知识来支持人格,特别是在社会参与方面。在管理失禁的不确定性导致自我怀疑,加剧了医疗性质的失禁护理,其中涉及的亲密关注超出了典型的护理。及时、可靠的建议可以减少不确定性,但许多人发现,寻找资源的压力很大。在自身福祉与照护之间取得平衡,突出表明需要支持系统同时满足照护伙伴和痴呆症患者的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A 'personhood paradox': Care partners' experiences supporting people with dementia and incontinence.

Globally, 50 million people live with dementia and mostly receive care at home. Urinary, faecal and functional incontinence is common in this population and increases care demands. This study explores care partners' experiences managing continence care for people with dementia in Aotearoa New Zealand. The data are drawn from a cross-sectional qualitative study with 18 care partners of people with dementia and incontinence in mid and northern regions of Aotearoa New Zealand. Participants were interviewed face-to-face from June 2022 to April 2023. Data were analysed using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis. Six Generalised Experiential Themes emerged. Care partners engaged in autobiographical and biographical meaning-making to interpret behaviours and maintain the personhood of people with dementia, focusing on dignity, identity, and social inclusion. However, caregiving often undermined care partners' personhood due to the physical and emotional demands of continence care. Access to resources was challenging, and healthcare support was often perceived as inadequate. Some care partners' strategies to find meaning and joy in everyday life contributed to resilience, while others experienced stress, fatigue, and burnout. Care partners used personal knowledge to support personhood, especially in social engagement. Uncertainty in managing incontinence led to self-doubt, exacerbated by the medicalised nature of continence care, which involves intimate attention beyond typical caregiving. Timely, credible advice could reduce uncertainty, but many found seeking resources overwhelming. Balancing their own well-being with caregiving highlights the need for support systems addressing the requirements of both care partners and people with dementia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信