Lorna Pairman, Yong Tai Beh, Hannah Maher, Sharon J Gardiner, Paul Chin, Jonathan Williman, Stephen T Chambers
{"title":"口服阿奇霉素治疗军团病的回顾性观察队列研究。","authors":"Lorna Pairman, Yong Tai Beh, Hannah Maher, Sharon J Gardiner, Paul Chin, Jonathan Williman, Stephen T Chambers","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Legionnaires' disease (LD) is typically treated with macrolides, including the azalide azithromycin, or quinolones. In 2013, guidelines for empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia at Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand were changed to prioritize oral azithromycin over IV clarithromycin.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether the change in antimicrobial guidelines led to altered outcomes for patients subsequently confirmed to have LD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with confirmed LD between 2010 and 2020 were identified from clinical and laboratory data. Hospital records were used to identify mortality, ICU admission, length of hospital stay, time to clinical stability, and time to first anti-Legionella treatment. Mean differences, risk ratios (RRs) and an interrupted time series with propensity adjustment were used to compare patient outcomes before and after the guideline change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 323 patients included: 128 before and 195 after the change. Patient outcomes generally improved after the change including: mortality within 30 days (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8); ICU admission (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.9); length of stay (difference -2.3 days, 95% CI -4.3 to -0.4); and time to clinical stability (difference -2.4 days, 95% CI -4.3 to -0.5). The interrupted time series analysis suggested improvements in patient outcomes may have occurred regardless of the guideline change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outcomes for patients with LD were not worsened by the change in antimicrobial guidelines and may have improved. Overall rates of mortality were low. This result was reassuring given the harm that may result from unnecessary use of IV compared with oral antimicrobial agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1354-1361"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective observational cohort study of oral azithromycin treatment for Legionnaires' disease.\",\"authors\":\"Lorna Pairman, Yong Tai Beh, Hannah Maher, Sharon J Gardiner, Paul Chin, Jonathan Williman, Stephen T Chambers\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jac/dkaf081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Legionnaires' disease (LD) is typically treated with macrolides, including the azalide azithromycin, or quinolones. In 2013, guidelines for empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia at Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand were changed to prioritize oral azithromycin over IV clarithromycin.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether the change in antimicrobial guidelines led to altered outcomes for patients subsequently confirmed to have LD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with confirmed LD between 2010 and 2020 were identified from clinical and laboratory data. Hospital records were used to identify mortality, ICU admission, length of hospital stay, time to clinical stability, and time to first anti-Legionella treatment. Mean differences, risk ratios (RRs) and an interrupted time series with propensity adjustment were used to compare patient outcomes before and after the guideline change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 323 patients included: 128 before and 195 after the change. Patient outcomes generally improved after the change including: mortality within 30 days (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8); ICU admission (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.9); length of stay (difference -2.3 days, 95% CI -4.3 to -0.4); and time to clinical stability (difference -2.4 days, 95% CI -4.3 to -0.5). The interrupted time series analysis suggested improvements in patient outcomes may have occurred regardless of the guideline change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outcomes for patients with LD were not worsened by the change in antimicrobial guidelines and may have improved. Overall rates of mortality were low. This result was reassuring given the harm that may result from unnecessary use of IV compared with oral antimicrobial agents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1354-1361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046395/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf081\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:军团病(LD)通常用大环内酯类药物治疗,包括氮唑类阿奇霉素或喹诺酮类药物。2013年,新西兰基督城医院对社区获得性肺炎的经验性治疗指南进行了修改,将口服阿奇霉素优先于静脉注射克拉霉素。目的:确定抗菌素指南的变化是否会改变随后确诊为LD的患者的预后。方法:从2010年至2020年的临床和实验室数据中确定确诊为LD的患者。使用医院记录确定死亡率、ICU入院、住院时间、临床稳定时间和首次抗军团菌治疗时间。使用平均差异、风险比(rr)和带有倾向调整的中断时间序列来比较指南改变前后的患者结果。结果:共纳入323例患者,其中术前128例,术后195例。患者预后在改变后普遍改善,包括:30天内死亡率(RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8);ICU住院(RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.9);住院时间(差异-2.3天,95% CI -4.3至-0.4);达到临床稳定所需时间(差异-2.4天,95% CI -4.3至-0.5)。中断时间序列分析表明,无论指南如何改变,患者预后都可能有所改善。结论:LD患者的预后并未因抗菌指南的改变而恶化,而且可能有所改善。总体死亡率很低。考虑到与口服抗菌药物相比,静脉注射可能造成不必要的危害,这一结果令人放心。
A retrospective observational cohort study of oral azithromycin treatment for Legionnaires' disease.
Background: Legionnaires' disease (LD) is typically treated with macrolides, including the azalide azithromycin, or quinolones. In 2013, guidelines for empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia at Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand were changed to prioritize oral azithromycin over IV clarithromycin.
Objectives: To determine whether the change in antimicrobial guidelines led to altered outcomes for patients subsequently confirmed to have LD.
Methods: Patients with confirmed LD between 2010 and 2020 were identified from clinical and laboratory data. Hospital records were used to identify mortality, ICU admission, length of hospital stay, time to clinical stability, and time to first anti-Legionella treatment. Mean differences, risk ratios (RRs) and an interrupted time series with propensity adjustment were used to compare patient outcomes before and after the guideline change.
Results: There were 323 patients included: 128 before and 195 after the change. Patient outcomes generally improved after the change including: mortality within 30 days (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8); ICU admission (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.9); length of stay (difference -2.3 days, 95% CI -4.3 to -0.4); and time to clinical stability (difference -2.4 days, 95% CI -4.3 to -0.5). The interrupted time series analysis suggested improvements in patient outcomes may have occurred regardless of the guideline change.
Conclusions: Outcomes for patients with LD were not worsened by the change in antimicrobial guidelines and may have improved. Overall rates of mortality were low. This result was reassuring given the harm that may result from unnecessary use of IV compared with oral antimicrobial agents.
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.