2024 修订ESC临床实践指南建议II:诊断测试和预测模型的证据等级分类系统。

IF 37.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Lisa Pennells, Magdy Abdelhamid, Victor Aboyans, Riccardo Asteggiano, Jelena Čelutkienė, Diederick E Grobbee, Bernard Iung, Peter Jüni, John William McEvoy, Amina Rakisheva, Xavier Rossello, Frank L J Visseren, Colin Baigent, Eva B Prescott
{"title":"2024 修订ESC临床实践指南建议II:诊断测试和预测模型的证据等级分类系统。","authors":"Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Lisa Pennells, Magdy Abdelhamid, Victor Aboyans, Riccardo Asteggiano, Jelena Čelutkienė, Diederick E Grobbee, Bernard Iung, Peter Jüni, John William McEvoy, Amina Rakisheva, Xavier Rossello, Frank L J Visseren, Colin Baigent, Eva B Prescott","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The level of evidence (LOE) grading system for European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) classifies the quality of the evidence supporting a recommendation. However, the current taxonomy does not fully consider the optimal study design necessary to establish evidence for different types of recommendations in ESC guidelines. Therefore, two separate task forces of clinical and methodological experts were appointed by the CPG Committee, with the first tasked with updating the LOE grading system for therapy and prevention and the second responsible for developing a LOE grading system for diagnosis and prediction. This report from the second of these Task Forces develops a new system for diagnostic tests and prediction models which maintains the three-level grading structure to classify the quality of the evidence but introduces new definitions specific for diagnosis and prediction. For diagnostic tests, LOE A represents conclusive evidence of adequate diagnostic ability from at least two high-quality studies. Level of evidence B represents suggestive evidence from one high-quality or at least two moderate-quality studies. Level of evidence C represents preliminary evidence not classified as A or B, including evidence from less than two moderate-quality studies, or from expert consensus. For prediction models, LOE A represents conclusive evidence of adequate predictive ability from at least one high-quality derivation and two or more external validation studies of at least moderate quality. Level of evidence B represents suggestive evidence in one or more derivation studies and one or more external validation studies of at least moderate quality. Level of evidence C represents preliminary evidence not classified as A or B, including evidence from a derivation study of at least moderate quality, but with low quality or no external validation, or a derivation study of low quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":11976,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1895-1906"},"PeriodicalIF":37.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2024 Revision of the level of evidence grading system for ESC clinical practice guideline recommendations II: diagnostic tests and prediction models.\",\"authors\":\"Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Lisa Pennells, Magdy Abdelhamid, Victor Aboyans, Riccardo Asteggiano, Jelena Čelutkienė, Diederick E Grobbee, Bernard Iung, Peter Jüni, John William McEvoy, Amina Rakisheva, Xavier Rossello, Frank L J Visseren, Colin Baigent, Eva B Prescott\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The level of evidence (LOE) grading system for European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) classifies the quality of the evidence supporting a recommendation. However, the current taxonomy does not fully consider the optimal study design necessary to establish evidence for different types of recommendations in ESC guidelines. Therefore, two separate task forces of clinical and methodological experts were appointed by the CPG Committee, with the first tasked with updating the LOE grading system for therapy and prevention and the second responsible for developing a LOE grading system for diagnosis and prediction. This report from the second of these Task Forces develops a new system for diagnostic tests and prediction models which maintains the three-level grading structure to classify the quality of the evidence but introduces new definitions specific for diagnosis and prediction. For diagnostic tests, LOE A represents conclusive evidence of adequate diagnostic ability from at least two high-quality studies. Level of evidence B represents suggestive evidence from one high-quality or at least two moderate-quality studies. Level of evidence C represents preliminary evidence not classified as A or B, including evidence from less than two moderate-quality studies, or from expert consensus. For prediction models, LOE A represents conclusive evidence of adequate predictive ability from at least one high-quality derivation and two or more external validation studies of at least moderate quality. Level of evidence B represents suggestive evidence in one or more derivation studies and one or more external validation studies of at least moderate quality. Level of evidence C represents preliminary evidence not classified as A or B, including evidence from a derivation study of at least moderate quality, but with low quality or no external validation, or a derivation study of low quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1895-1906\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":37.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf016\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)临床实践指南(CPG)的证据水平(LOE)分级系统对支持建议的证据质量进行分类。然而,目前的分类法并没有充分考虑为ESC指南中不同类型的建议建立证据所必需的最佳研究设计。因此,CPG委员会任命了两个独立的临床和方法学专家工作组,第一个工作组负责更新用于治疗和预防的LOE分级系统,第二个工作组负责开发用于诊断和预测的LOE分级系统。第二工作组的这份报告为诊断测试和预测模型开发了一个新的系统,该系统保持了对证据质量进行分类的三级分级结构,但引入了专门针对诊断和预测的新定义。对于诊断测试,loa代表了至少两项高质量研究的充分诊断能力的结论性证据。证据水平B表示来自一项高质量或至少两项中等质量研究的暗示性证据。证据水平C表示未分类为A或B的初步证据,包括来自少于两个中等质量研究的证据,或来自专家共识的证据。对于预测模型,LOE A代表了至少一个高质量的推导和两个或更多至少中等质量的外部验证研究的充分预测能力的确凿证据。证据水平B表示在一个或多个衍生研究和一个或多个至少中等质量的外部验证研究中存在暗示性证据。证据水平C表示未分类为A或B的初步证据,包括来自至少中等质量但质量低或无外部验证的衍生研究的证据,或低质量的衍生研究的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
2024 Revision of the level of evidence grading system for ESC clinical practice guideline recommendations II: diagnostic tests and prediction models.

The level of evidence (LOE) grading system for European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) classifies the quality of the evidence supporting a recommendation. However, the current taxonomy does not fully consider the optimal study design necessary to establish evidence for different types of recommendations in ESC guidelines. Therefore, two separate task forces of clinical and methodological experts were appointed by the CPG Committee, with the first tasked with updating the LOE grading system for therapy and prevention and the second responsible for developing a LOE grading system for diagnosis and prediction. This report from the second of these Task Forces develops a new system for diagnostic tests and prediction models which maintains the three-level grading structure to classify the quality of the evidence but introduces new definitions specific for diagnosis and prediction. For diagnostic tests, LOE A represents conclusive evidence of adequate diagnostic ability from at least two high-quality studies. Level of evidence B represents suggestive evidence from one high-quality or at least two moderate-quality studies. Level of evidence C represents preliminary evidence not classified as A or B, including evidence from less than two moderate-quality studies, or from expert consensus. For prediction models, LOE A represents conclusive evidence of adequate predictive ability from at least one high-quality derivation and two or more external validation studies of at least moderate quality. Level of evidence B represents suggestive evidence in one or more derivation studies and one or more external validation studies of at least moderate quality. Level of evidence C represents preliminary evidence not classified as A or B, including evidence from a derivation study of at least moderate quality, but with low quality or no external validation, or a derivation study of low quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal
European Heart Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
39.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
3942
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal is a renowned international journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine. It is published weekly and is the official journal of the European Society of Cardiology. This peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing high-quality clinical and scientific material pertaining to all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. It covers a diverse range of topics including research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. Moreover, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of information and discussions on various aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational matters. In addition to original papers on cardiovascular medicine and surgery, the European Heart Journal also presents reviews, clinical perspectives, ESC Guidelines, and editorial articles that highlight recent advancements in cardiology. Additionally, the journal actively encourages readers to share their thoughts and opinions through correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信