人工智能在软组织和骨肿瘤放射成像中的应用:对CLAIM和FUTURE-AI指南的系统评价

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Douwe J Spaanderman, Matthew Marzetti, Xinyi Wan, Andrew F Scarsbrook, Philip Robinson, Edwin H G Oei, Jacob J Visser, Robert Hemke, Kirsten van Langevelde, David F Hanff, Geert J L H van Leenders, Cornelis Verhoef, Dirk J Grünhagen, Wiro J Niessen, Stefan Klein, Martijn P A Starmans
{"title":"人工智能在软组织和骨肿瘤放射成像中的应用:对CLAIM和FUTURE-AI指南的系统评价","authors":"Douwe J Spaanderman, Matthew Marzetti, Xinyi Wan, Andrew F Scarsbrook, Philip Robinson, Edwin H G Oei, Jacob J Visser, Robert Hemke, Kirsten van Langevelde, David F Hanff, Geert J L H van Leenders, Cornelis Verhoef, Dirk J Grünhagen, Wiro J Niessen, Stefan Klein, Martijn P A Starmans","doi":"10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Soft-tissue and bone tumours (STBT) are rare, diagnostically challenging lesions with variable clinical behaviours and treatment approaches. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods using radiological imaging for diagnosis and prognosis of these tumours, highlighting challenges in clinical translation, and evaluating study alignment with the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) and the FUTURE-AI international consensus guidelines for trustworthy and deployable AI to promote the clinical translation of AI methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review identified literature from several bibliographic databases, covering papers published before 17/07/2024. Original research published in peer-reviewed journals, focused on radiology-based AI for diagnosis or prognosis of primary STBT was included. Exclusion criteria were animal, cadaveric, or laboratory studies, and non-English papers. Abstracts were screened by two of three independent reviewers to determine eligibility. Included papers were assessed against the two guidelines by one of three independent reviewers. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023467970).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The search identified 15,015 abstracts, from which 325 articles were included for evaluation. Most studies performed moderately on CLAIM, averaging a score of 28.9 ± 7.5 out of 53, but poorly on FUTURE-AI, averaging 5.1 ± 2.1 out of 30.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Imaging-AI tools for STBT remain at the proof-of-concept stage, indicating significant room for improvement. Future efforts by AI developers should focus on design (e.g. defining unmet clinical need, intended clinical setting and how AI would be integrated in clinical workflow), development (e.g. building on previous work, training with data that reflect real-world usage, explainability), evaluation (e.g. ensuring biases are evaluated and addressed, evaluating AI against current best practices), and the awareness of data reproducibility and availability (making documented code and data publicly available). Following these recommendations could improve clinical translation of AI methods.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Hanarth Fonds, ICAI Lab, NIHR, EuCanImage.</p>","PeriodicalId":11494,"journal":{"name":"EBioMedicine","volume":"114 ","pages":"105642"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI in radiological imaging of soft-tissue and bone tumours: a systematic review evaluating against CLAIM and FUTURE-AI guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Douwe J Spaanderman, Matthew Marzetti, Xinyi Wan, Andrew F Scarsbrook, Philip Robinson, Edwin H G Oei, Jacob J Visser, Robert Hemke, Kirsten van Langevelde, David F Hanff, Geert J L H van Leenders, Cornelis Verhoef, Dirk J Grünhagen, Wiro J Niessen, Stefan Klein, Martijn P A Starmans\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Soft-tissue and bone tumours (STBT) are rare, diagnostically challenging lesions with variable clinical behaviours and treatment approaches. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods using radiological imaging for diagnosis and prognosis of these tumours, highlighting challenges in clinical translation, and evaluating study alignment with the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) and the FUTURE-AI international consensus guidelines for trustworthy and deployable AI to promote the clinical translation of AI methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review identified literature from several bibliographic databases, covering papers published before 17/07/2024. Original research published in peer-reviewed journals, focused on radiology-based AI for diagnosis or prognosis of primary STBT was included. Exclusion criteria were animal, cadaveric, or laboratory studies, and non-English papers. Abstracts were screened by two of three independent reviewers to determine eligibility. Included papers were assessed against the two guidelines by one of three independent reviewers. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023467970).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The search identified 15,015 abstracts, from which 325 articles were included for evaluation. Most studies performed moderately on CLAIM, averaging a score of 28.9 ± 7.5 out of 53, but poorly on FUTURE-AI, averaging 5.1 ± 2.1 out of 30.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Imaging-AI tools for STBT remain at the proof-of-concept stage, indicating significant room for improvement. Future efforts by AI developers should focus on design (e.g. defining unmet clinical need, intended clinical setting and how AI would be integrated in clinical workflow), development (e.g. building on previous work, training with data that reflect real-world usage, explainability), evaluation (e.g. ensuring biases are evaluated and addressed, evaluating AI against current best practices), and the awareness of data reproducibility and availability (making documented code and data publicly available). Following these recommendations could improve clinical translation of AI methods.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Hanarth Fonds, ICAI Lab, NIHR, EuCanImage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EBioMedicine\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"105642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EBioMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105642\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EBioMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105642","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:软组织和骨肿瘤(STBT)是罕见的,具有不同临床行为和治疗方法的诊断挑战性病变。本系统综述旨在概述使用放射成像对这些肿瘤进行诊断和预后的人工智能(AI)方法,强调临床翻译中的挑战,并评估研究与医学成像中的人工智能清单(CLAIM)和FUTURE-AI国际共识指南的一致性,以促进人工智能方法的临床翻译。方法:系统评价从多个文献数据库中检索2024年7月17日之前发表的文献。发表在同行评议期刊上的原创研究,重点是基于放射学的人工智能用于原发性STBT的诊断或预后。排除标准为动物、尸体或实验室研究和非英文论文。摘要由三位独立审稿人中的两位进行筛选以确定是否合格。纳入的论文由三名独立审稿人中的一名根据这两项指南进行评估。审查方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023467970)。结果:检索到15,015篇摘要,其中325篇纳入评估。大多数研究在CLAIM方面表现中等,53分中平均得分28.9±7.5分,但在FUTURE-AI方面表现不佳,30分中平均得分5.1±2.1分。解释:用于STBT的成像人工智能工具仍处于概念验证阶段,表明有很大的改进空间。人工智能开发人员未来的工作应侧重于设计(例如,定义未满足的临床需求、预期的临床环境以及如何将人工智能集成到临床工作流程中)、开发(例如,以以前的工作为基础,使用反映现实世界使用情况的数据进行培训,可解释性)、评估(例如,确保评估和解决偏见,根据当前最佳实践评估人工智能)、以及对数据再现性和可用性的认识(使文档化的代码和数据公开可用)。遵循这些建议可以改善人工智能方法的临床翻译。资助:Hanarth Fonds, ICAI Lab, NIHR, eucimage。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI in radiological imaging of soft-tissue and bone tumours: a systematic review evaluating against CLAIM and FUTURE-AI guidelines.

Background: Soft-tissue and bone tumours (STBT) are rare, diagnostically challenging lesions with variable clinical behaviours and treatment approaches. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods using radiological imaging for diagnosis and prognosis of these tumours, highlighting challenges in clinical translation, and evaluating study alignment with the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) and the FUTURE-AI international consensus guidelines for trustworthy and deployable AI to promote the clinical translation of AI methods.

Methods: The systematic review identified literature from several bibliographic databases, covering papers published before 17/07/2024. Original research published in peer-reviewed journals, focused on radiology-based AI for diagnosis or prognosis of primary STBT was included. Exclusion criteria were animal, cadaveric, or laboratory studies, and non-English papers. Abstracts were screened by two of three independent reviewers to determine eligibility. Included papers were assessed against the two guidelines by one of three independent reviewers. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023467970).

Findings: The search identified 15,015 abstracts, from which 325 articles were included for evaluation. Most studies performed moderately on CLAIM, averaging a score of 28.9 ± 7.5 out of 53, but poorly on FUTURE-AI, averaging 5.1 ± 2.1 out of 30.

Interpretation: Imaging-AI tools for STBT remain at the proof-of-concept stage, indicating significant room for improvement. Future efforts by AI developers should focus on design (e.g. defining unmet clinical need, intended clinical setting and how AI would be integrated in clinical workflow), development (e.g. building on previous work, training with data that reflect real-world usage, explainability), evaluation (e.g. ensuring biases are evaluated and addressed, evaluating AI against current best practices), and the awareness of data reproducibility and availability (making documented code and data publicly available). Following these recommendations could improve clinical translation of AI methods.

Funding: Hanarth Fonds, ICAI Lab, NIHR, EuCanImage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EBioMedicine
EBioMedicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
579
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: eBioMedicine is a comprehensive biomedical research journal that covers a wide range of studies that are relevant to human health. Our focus is on original research that explores the fundamental factors influencing human health and disease, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and treatments, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic tools, and the investigation and modification of disease pathways and mechanisms. We welcome studies from any biomedical discipline that contribute to our understanding of disease and aim to improve human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信