Ann Marlene Gram Kjærulff, Simon Fuglsang, Tejs Ehlers Klug
{"title":"扁桃体周围脓肿评估工具。","authors":"Ann Marlene Gram Kjærulff, Simon Fuglsang, Tejs Ehlers Klug","doi":"10.61409/A01240060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We developed and validated a patient-reported outcome measurement for measuring the severity of symptoms and efficacy of different treatment modalities in patients with peritonsillar abscess (PTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 19-item questionnaire was constructed using a five-point Likert scale. Fifteen to 40-year-old patients with PTA treated at two ear-nose-throat departments completed the survey. Healthy students served as controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 PTA patients and 76 controls were included. Twelve items had appropriate inter-item correlations (in the 0.25-0.75 range) and high mean scores (> 3.5) among patients and were therefore included in the final tool, coined the peritonsillar abscess assessment tool (PAAT)-12. The patients' mean PAAT-12 score was 49.0 (95% confidence interval (CI): 46.8-51.1) at the time of inclusion compared with 14.2 (95% CI: 13.7-14.7) for controls (p less-than 0.001). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the questionnaire was 0.86. The standard error of measurement was 4.98, the intraclass correlation 0.88 and the Spearman correlation test-retest reliability 0.79.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reliability and validity of the PAAT-12 were very high. The PAAT-12 is the first validated tool for measuring the severity and duration of symptoms from the perspective of PTA patients and for quantifying and comparing different treatment modalities in PTA patients.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Overlærer Svend Hansens Fond.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (#1-16-02-356-19).</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"71 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peritonsillar abscess assessment tool.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Marlene Gram Kjærulff, Simon Fuglsang, Tejs Ehlers Klug\",\"doi\":\"10.61409/A01240060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We developed and validated a patient-reported outcome measurement for measuring the severity of symptoms and efficacy of different treatment modalities in patients with peritonsillar abscess (PTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 19-item questionnaire was constructed using a five-point Likert scale. Fifteen to 40-year-old patients with PTA treated at two ear-nose-throat departments completed the survey. Healthy students served as controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 PTA patients and 76 controls were included. Twelve items had appropriate inter-item correlations (in the 0.25-0.75 range) and high mean scores (> 3.5) among patients and were therefore included in the final tool, coined the peritonsillar abscess assessment tool (PAAT)-12. The patients' mean PAAT-12 score was 49.0 (95% confidence interval (CI): 46.8-51.1) at the time of inclusion compared with 14.2 (95% CI: 13.7-14.7) for controls (p less-than 0.001). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the questionnaire was 0.86. The standard error of measurement was 4.98, the intraclass correlation 0.88 and the Spearman correlation test-retest reliability 0.79.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reliability and validity of the PAAT-12 were very high. The PAAT-12 is the first validated tool for measuring the severity and duration of symptoms from the perspective of PTA patients and for quantifying and comparing different treatment modalities in PTA patients.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Overlærer Svend Hansens Fond.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (#1-16-02-356-19).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Danish medical journal\",\"volume\":\"71 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Danish medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61409/A01240060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A01240060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: We developed and validated a patient-reported outcome measurement for measuring the severity of symptoms and efficacy of different treatment modalities in patients with peritonsillar abscess (PTA).
Methods: A 19-item questionnaire was constructed using a five-point Likert scale. Fifteen to 40-year-old patients with PTA treated at two ear-nose-throat departments completed the survey. Healthy students served as controls.
Results: A total of 51 PTA patients and 76 controls were included. Twelve items had appropriate inter-item correlations (in the 0.25-0.75 range) and high mean scores (> 3.5) among patients and were therefore included in the final tool, coined the peritonsillar abscess assessment tool (PAAT)-12. The patients' mean PAAT-12 score was 49.0 (95% confidence interval (CI): 46.8-51.1) at the time of inclusion compared with 14.2 (95% CI: 13.7-14.7) for controls (p less-than 0.001). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the questionnaire was 0.86. The standard error of measurement was 4.98, the intraclass correlation 0.88 and the Spearman correlation test-retest reliability 0.79.
Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the PAAT-12 were very high. The PAAT-12 is the first validated tool for measuring the severity and duration of symptoms from the perspective of PTA patients and for quantifying and comparing different treatment modalities in PTA patients.
Funding: Overlærer Svend Hansens Fond.
Trial registration: The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (#1-16-02-356-19).
期刊介绍:
The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content.
DMJ will publish the following articles:
• Original articles
• Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials
• Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
• PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences
• DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.