DREAMS-START(睡眠痴呆相关手册)随机对照试验的过程评价痴呆症患者及其照护者睡眠障碍的亲属策略。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Sarah Amador, Gill Livingston, Mariam Adeleke, Julie Barber, Lucy Webster, Hang Yuan, Sube Banerjee, Ankita Bhojwani, Georgina Charlesworth, Christopher Clarke, Caroline Connell, Colin A Espie, Ruochen Gan, Lina Gonzalez, Rossana Horsley, Rachael M Hunter, Simon D Kyle, Malvika Muralidhar, Liam Pikett, Malgorzata Raczek, Marija Taneska, Zuzana Walker, Zuyu Wang, Penny Rapaport
{"title":"DREAMS-START(睡眠痴呆相关手册)随机对照试验的过程评价痴呆症患者及其照护者睡眠障碍的亲属策略。","authors":"Sarah Amador, Gill Livingston, Mariam Adeleke, Julie Barber, Lucy Webster, Hang Yuan, Sube Banerjee, Ankita Bhojwani, Georgina Charlesworth, Christopher Clarke, Caroline Connell, Colin A Espie, Ruochen Gan, Lina Gonzalez, Rossana Horsley, Rachael M Hunter, Simon D Kyle, Malvika Muralidhar, Liam Pikett, Malgorzata Raczek, Marija Taneska, Zuzana Walker, Zuyu Wang, Penny Rapaport","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>DREAMS-START is a multicomponent intervention targeting sleep disturbance in people with dementia. To enhance understanding of the DREAMS-START randomised controlled trial, which showed improved sleep in the intervention compared to the control arm, we conducted a process evaluation exploring (i) DREAMS-START delivery, (ii) behaviour change mechanisms and (iii) contextual factors impacting outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed-methods design. We measured intervention adherence, fidelity and additional therapeutic process measures. We interviewed a sub-sample of intervention arm family carers and facilitators delivering DREAMS-START. We analysed data thematically guided by a prespecified theory of change logic model informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. We measured movement using an actigraph worn by the person with dementia at baseline and at four- and eight-month follow-ups to explore potential mechanisms of action.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Attendance was good (82.8% attended ≥4/6 sessions). Mean fidelity score (95.4%; SD 0.08) and median score for all four process measures assessed (5/5; IQR 5-5) were high. We interviewed 43/188 family carers and 9/49 DREAMS-START facilitators. We identified three overarching themes aligned with our model: (i) knowledge and facilitation enable behaviour change, (ii) increasing sleep pressure and developing skills to manage sleep disturbances and (iii) Establishing a routine and sense of control. We were unable to collect sufficient data for pre-specified actigraphy analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite competing demands, carers attended DREAMS-START. It promoted behaviour change through supportive in-session reflection, increasing carer knowledge and skills. This was embedded between sessions and actions were positively reinforced as carers experienced changes. Results will inform future implementation in clinical services.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process evaluation in a randomised controlled trial of DREAMS-START (dementia related manual for sleep; strategies for relatives) for sleep disturbance in people with dementia and their carers.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Amador, Gill Livingston, Mariam Adeleke, Julie Barber, Lucy Webster, Hang Yuan, Sube Banerjee, Ankita Bhojwani, Georgina Charlesworth, Christopher Clarke, Caroline Connell, Colin A Espie, Ruochen Gan, Lina Gonzalez, Rossana Horsley, Rachael M Hunter, Simon D Kyle, Malvika Muralidhar, Liam Pikett, Malgorzata Raczek, Marija Taneska, Zuzana Walker, Zuyu Wang, Penny Rapaport\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ageing/afaf053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>DREAMS-START is a multicomponent intervention targeting sleep disturbance in people with dementia. To enhance understanding of the DREAMS-START randomised controlled trial, which showed improved sleep in the intervention compared to the control arm, we conducted a process evaluation exploring (i) DREAMS-START delivery, (ii) behaviour change mechanisms and (iii) contextual factors impacting outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed-methods design. We measured intervention adherence, fidelity and additional therapeutic process measures. We interviewed a sub-sample of intervention arm family carers and facilitators delivering DREAMS-START. We analysed data thematically guided by a prespecified theory of change logic model informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. We measured movement using an actigraph worn by the person with dementia at baseline and at four- and eight-month follow-ups to explore potential mechanisms of action.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Attendance was good (82.8% attended ≥4/6 sessions). Mean fidelity score (95.4%; SD 0.08) and median score for all four process measures assessed (5/5; IQR 5-5) were high. We interviewed 43/188 family carers and 9/49 DREAMS-START facilitators. We identified three overarching themes aligned with our model: (i) knowledge and facilitation enable behaviour change, (ii) increasing sleep pressure and developing skills to manage sleep disturbances and (iii) Establishing a routine and sense of control. We were unable to collect sufficient data for pre-specified actigraphy analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite competing demands, carers attended DREAMS-START. It promoted behaviour change through supportive in-session reflection, increasing carer knowledge and skills. This was embedded between sessions and actions were positively reinforced as carers experienced changes. Results will inform future implementation in clinical services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Age and ageing\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926977/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Age and ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf053\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

dream - start是针对痴呆患者睡眠障碍的多组分干预。为了加强对dream - start随机对照试验的理解,该试验显示干预组与对照组相比睡眠得到改善,我们进行了一个过程评估,探索(i) dream - start交付,(ii)行为改变机制和(iii)影响结果的环境因素。方法:混合方法设计。我们测量了干预依从性、保真度和额外的治疗过程测量。我们采访了提供DREAMS-START的干预臂家庭照顾者和促进者的子样本。我们在预先指定的由理论领域框架提供信息的变化理论逻辑模型的指导下对数据进行了主题分析。我们在基线和4个月和8个月的随访中使用痴呆症患者佩戴的活动记录仪来测量运动,以探索潜在的作用机制。结果:出勤率良好(82.8%参加≥4/6次)。平均保真度得分(95.4%;SD 0.08)和评估的所有四个过程措施的中位数得分(5/5;IQR 5-5)高。我们采访了43/188名家庭照顾者和9/49名DREAMS-START促进者。我们确定了与我们的模型相一致的三个总体主题:(i)知识和便利使行为改变;(ii)增加睡眠压力和发展管理睡眠障碍的技能;(iii)建立例行程序和控制感。我们无法收集足够的数据进行预先指定的活动描记分析。结论:尽管需求相互竞争,护理人员还是参加了DREAMS-START。它通过支持性的会议反思、增加护理人员的知识和技能来促进行为改变。这是嵌入在会议之间的,当护理人员经历变化时,行动会得到积极加强。结果将为今后在临床服务中的实施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Process evaluation in a randomised controlled trial of DREAMS-START (dementia related manual for sleep; strategies for relatives) for sleep disturbance in people with dementia and their carers.

Introduction: DREAMS-START is a multicomponent intervention targeting sleep disturbance in people with dementia. To enhance understanding of the DREAMS-START randomised controlled trial, which showed improved sleep in the intervention compared to the control arm, we conducted a process evaluation exploring (i) DREAMS-START delivery, (ii) behaviour change mechanisms and (iii) contextual factors impacting outcomes.

Methods: Mixed-methods design. We measured intervention adherence, fidelity and additional therapeutic process measures. We interviewed a sub-sample of intervention arm family carers and facilitators delivering DREAMS-START. We analysed data thematically guided by a prespecified theory of change logic model informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. We measured movement using an actigraph worn by the person with dementia at baseline and at four- and eight-month follow-ups to explore potential mechanisms of action.

Results: Attendance was good (82.8% attended ≥4/6 sessions). Mean fidelity score (95.4%; SD 0.08) and median score for all four process measures assessed (5/5; IQR 5-5) were high. We interviewed 43/188 family carers and 9/49 DREAMS-START facilitators. We identified three overarching themes aligned with our model: (i) knowledge and facilitation enable behaviour change, (ii) increasing sleep pressure and developing skills to manage sleep disturbances and (iii) Establishing a routine and sense of control. We were unable to collect sufficient data for pre-specified actigraphy analyses.

Conclusion: Despite competing demands, carers attended DREAMS-START. It promoted behaviour change through supportive in-session reflection, increasing carer knowledge and skills. This was embedded between sessions and actions were positively reinforced as carers experienced changes. Results will inform future implementation in clinical services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信