骨膜下植入物：一种值得重新审视的失落艺术？

IF 3.7 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1111/cid.70025

Ryan Goh, Cedryck Vaquette, Omar Breik, Saso Ivanovski, Martin Batstone

{"title":"骨膜下植入物：一种值得重新审视的失落艺术？","authors":"Ryan Goh, Cedryck Vaquette, Omar Breik, Saso Ivanovski, Martin Batstone","doi":"10.1111/cid.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Subperiosteal implants were commonly used for dentally rehabilitating atrophic maxillae and mandibles in the 1940s–1980s, losing popularity following the introduction of endosseous root-formed osseointegrated implants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Historically, subperiosteal implants had regular complications of hardware exposure, implant mobility, and pain, resulting in the removal of the implant. The transmucosal posts appear to be the primary cause of failure due to bacterial colonization and propagation down the implant substructure. These implants are currently regaining interest due to their applications for dentally rehabilitating patients following an oncological ablation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>For these implants to return to the dental and maxillofacial industry, contemporary techniques of bone grafting and implant materials should be explored. This review discusses the historical issues with subperiosteal implants and avenues for the improvement of long-term outcomes in the 21st century.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subperiosteal Implants: A Lost Art Worth Revisiting?\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Goh, Cedryck Vaquette, Omar Breik, Saso Ivanovski, Martin Batstone\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cid.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Subperiosteal implants were commonly used for dentally rehabilitating atrophic maxillae and mandibles in the 1940s–1980s, losing popularity following the introduction of endosseous root-formed osseointegrated implants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Historically, subperiosteal implants had regular complications of hardware exposure, implant mobility, and pain, resulting in the removal of the implant. The transmucosal posts appear to be the primary cause of failure due to bacterial colonization and propagation down the implant substructure. These implants are currently regaining interest due to their applications for dentally rehabilitating patients following an oncological ablation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>For these implants to return to the dental and maxillofacial industry, contemporary techniques of bone grafting and implant materials should be explored. This review discusses the historical issues with subperiosteal implants and avenues for the improvement of long-term outcomes in the 21st century.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925703/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70025\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：骨膜下种植体在20世纪40 - 80年代被广泛用于颌骨萎缩的牙科修复，随着骨内根形成的骨整合种植体的引入而逐渐失去了知名度。结果：从历史上看，骨膜下种植体有常规的并发症，如硬件暴露、种植体移动和疼痛，导致种植体取出。由于细菌在种植体亚结构中定植和繁殖，跨粘膜桩似乎是失败的主要原因。这些植入物目前因其在肿瘤消融后的牙齿康复患者中的应用而重新引起人们的兴趣。结论：为使这些种植体重返口腔颌面工业，应探索当代植骨技术和种植材料。这篇综述讨论了骨膜下植入的历史问题以及21世纪改善长期预后的途径。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Subperiosteal Implants: A Lost Art Worth Revisiting?

查看原文本刊更多论文

Subperiosteal Implants: A Lost Art Worth Revisiting?

Background

Subperiosteal implants were commonly used for dentally rehabilitating atrophic maxillae and mandibles in the 1940s–1980s, losing popularity following the introduction of endosseous root-formed osseointegrated implants.

Results

Historically, subperiosteal implants had regular complications of hardware exposure, implant mobility, and pain, resulting in the removal of the implant. The transmucosal posts appear to be the primary cause of failure due to bacterial colonization and propagation down the implant substructure. These implants are currently regaining interest due to their applications for dentally rehabilitating patients following an oncological ablation.

Conclusion

For these implants to return to the dental and maxillofacial industry, contemporary techniques of bone grafting and implant materials should be explored. This review discusses the historical issues with subperiosteal implants and avenues for the improvement of long-term outcomes in the 21st century.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

6.00

自引率

13.90%

发文量

103

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.