Lennart Kiel, Majse Lind, Sune Bo, Carsten Réne Jørgensen, Rikke Bøye, Christina Kjær Frederiksen, Helle Spindler
{"title":"病理性人格特征、功能障碍和人格障碍之间的联系:基本人格特征和身份障碍的控制。","authors":"Lennart Kiel, Majse Lind, Sune Bo, Carsten Réne Jørgensen, Rikke Bøye, Christina Kjær Frederiksen, Helle Spindler","doi":"10.1037/per0000731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contemporary models conceptualize personality disorder (PD) as a combination of personality dysfunction and pathological personality traits. However, some perspectives suggest that pathological traits, along with functional impairment, may be sufficient indicators of PD. This study builds on previous research by investigating whether identity disturbance, defined as impaired coherence, inconsistency, and discontinuity in the sense of self, contributes to pathological personality trait scores beyond basic five-factor personality traits. Additionally, it examines whether the associations between pathological personality trait domains, PD diagnosis, and functional impairment remain when controlling for identity disturbance and basic personality traits. The study included two samples: 776 community individuals (344 with a psychiatric history) and 77 psychiatric patients diagnosed with PD. Structural equation models with latent factors indicated that pathological personality trait domains can be described as a combination of variance from basic personality traits and to a lesser extent identity disturbance. When identity disturbance was controlled for, however, pathological trait domains no longer differentiated individuals with PD from community participants with psychiatric histories. Furthermore, individual pathological trait domains did not demonstrate incremental validity in predicting functional impairment beyond the contributions of basic personality traits and identity disturbance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between pathological personality traits, functional impairment, and personality disorder: Controlling for basic personality traits and identity disturbance.\",\"authors\":\"Lennart Kiel, Majse Lind, Sune Bo, Carsten Réne Jørgensen, Rikke Bøye, Christina Kjær Frederiksen, Helle Spindler\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/per0000731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Contemporary models conceptualize personality disorder (PD) as a combination of personality dysfunction and pathological personality traits. However, some perspectives suggest that pathological traits, along with functional impairment, may be sufficient indicators of PD. This study builds on previous research by investigating whether identity disturbance, defined as impaired coherence, inconsistency, and discontinuity in the sense of self, contributes to pathological personality trait scores beyond basic five-factor personality traits. Additionally, it examines whether the associations between pathological personality trait domains, PD diagnosis, and functional impairment remain when controlling for identity disturbance and basic personality traits. The study included two samples: 776 community individuals (344 with a psychiatric history) and 77 psychiatric patients diagnosed with PD. Structural equation models with latent factors indicated that pathological personality trait domains can be described as a combination of variance from basic personality traits and to a lesser extent identity disturbance. When identity disturbance was controlled for, however, pathological trait domains no longer differentiated individuals with PD from community participants with psychiatric histories. Furthermore, individual pathological trait domains did not demonstrate incremental validity in predicting functional impairment beyond the contributions of basic personality traits and identity disturbance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
当代模型将人格障碍(PD)概念化为人格功能障碍和病态人格特征的结合。然而,一些观点认为病理特征以及功能障碍可能是PD的充分指标。本研究建立在先前研究的基础上,调查身份障碍(定义为自我意识上的连贯性、不一致性和不连续性受损)是否会导致超出基本五因素人格特征的病态人格特征得分。此外,它还研究了在控制身份障碍和基本人格特质时,病理人格特质域、PD诊断和功能障碍之间的联系是否仍然存在。该研究包括两个样本:776名社区个体(344名有精神病史)和77名诊断为PD的精神患者。具有潜在因素的结构方程模型表明,病态人格特征域可以被描述为基本人格特征变异和较小程度的身份障碍的组合。然而,当身份障碍得到控制时,病理特征域不再将PD患者与有精神病史的社区参与者区分开来。此外,除了基本人格特质和身份障碍的贡献外,个体病理特征域在预测功能障碍方面没有显示出增加的有效性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Associations between pathological personality traits, functional impairment, and personality disorder: Controlling for basic personality traits and identity disturbance.
Contemporary models conceptualize personality disorder (PD) as a combination of personality dysfunction and pathological personality traits. However, some perspectives suggest that pathological traits, along with functional impairment, may be sufficient indicators of PD. This study builds on previous research by investigating whether identity disturbance, defined as impaired coherence, inconsistency, and discontinuity in the sense of self, contributes to pathological personality trait scores beyond basic five-factor personality traits. Additionally, it examines whether the associations between pathological personality trait domains, PD diagnosis, and functional impairment remain when controlling for identity disturbance and basic personality traits. The study included two samples: 776 community individuals (344 with a psychiatric history) and 77 psychiatric patients diagnosed with PD. Structural equation models with latent factors indicated that pathological personality trait domains can be described as a combination of variance from basic personality traits and to a lesser extent identity disturbance. When identity disturbance was controlled for, however, pathological trait domains no longer differentiated individuals with PD from community participants with psychiatric histories. Furthermore, individual pathological trait domains did not demonstrate incremental validity in predicting functional impairment beyond the contributions of basic personality traits and identity disturbance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).