"桡骨远端先行":在澳大利亚进行冠状动脉造影和 PCI 的可行性和安全性。

AsiaIntervention Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00036
Samantha L Saunders, Sanjeev J Casinader, Ritin S Fernandez, Kelly M Easey, Eunice Chuah, Adam R Perkovic, Shubhang Hariharan, David Scott, Philopatir Mikhail, Christian Said, Roberto Spina, Austin N May, Andrew Boyle, Thomas J Ford
{"title":"\"桡骨远端先行\":在澳大利亚进行冠状动脉造影和 PCI 的可行性和安全性。","authors":"Samantha L Saunders, Sanjeev J Casinader, Ritin S Fernandez, Kelly M Easey, Eunice Chuah, Adam R Perkovic, Shubhang Hariharan, David Scott, Philopatir Mikhail, Christian Said, Roberto Spina, Austin N May, Andrew Boyle, Thomas J Ford","doi":"10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal transradial artery (dTRA) access offers benefits to patients and operators.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We sought to determine the feasibility and safety of the dTRA as a first-line vascular access site and to evaluate predictors of dTRA approach success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analysed consecutive patients from three Australian centres who underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the dTRA (from November 2019 to December 2023). The primary outcome was procedural success (completion of a case using the dTRA puncture site). Secondary outcomes were access site crossover, procedural safety, arterial patency at follow-up, and predictors of procedural success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,692 patients were included (mean age 70.6±10.5 years, 59% male [n=993], mean body mass index [BMI] 31.0±7.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, right dTRA 85%, ultrasound guidance 99%). First pass success was achieved in 92.2% (n=1,560) of patients, and 1.5% had success on the second puncture of the ipsilateral dTRA. Crossover was required in 6.3% (n=107; proximal transradial [n=78; 4.6%], contralateral dTRA [n=22; 1.3%], femoral [n=6; 0.4%], ulnar [n=1; 0.1%]). There were no major vascular complications. Access site bleeding requiring treatment occurred in 0.3% (n=5) of cases. Proximal and distal radial occlusion occurred in 0.1% and 0.4%, respectively. Thirty-day major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 1.4% (n=24). Radial artery patency was 98% (630/641) at follow-up. Hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 1.73; p=0.029), an experienced operator (attending/consultant and ≥4 years' experience with dTRA; OR 2.80; p<0.001), and a low BMI (OR 1.48 per 10 unit decrease in BMI; p=0.012) were predictors of technical success.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The \"distal radial first\" approach is feasible and safe for coronary procedures. Factors associated with procedural success include increased operator experience, a low BMI, and hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":72310,"journal":{"name":"AsiaIntervention","volume":"11 1","pages":"35-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Distal radial first\\\": feasibility and safety for coronary angiography and PCI in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha L Saunders, Sanjeev J Casinader, Ritin S Fernandez, Kelly M Easey, Eunice Chuah, Adam R Perkovic, Shubhang Hariharan, David Scott, Philopatir Mikhail, Christian Said, Roberto Spina, Austin N May, Andrew Boyle, Thomas J Ford\",\"doi\":\"10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal transradial artery (dTRA) access offers benefits to patients and operators.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We sought to determine the feasibility and safety of the dTRA as a first-line vascular access site and to evaluate predictors of dTRA approach success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analysed consecutive patients from three Australian centres who underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the dTRA (from November 2019 to December 2023). The primary outcome was procedural success (completion of a case using the dTRA puncture site). Secondary outcomes were access site crossover, procedural safety, arterial patency at follow-up, and predictors of procedural success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,692 patients were included (mean age 70.6±10.5 years, 59% male [n=993], mean body mass index [BMI] 31.0±7.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, right dTRA 85%, ultrasound guidance 99%). First pass success was achieved in 92.2% (n=1,560) of patients, and 1.5% had success on the second puncture of the ipsilateral dTRA. Crossover was required in 6.3% (n=107; proximal transradial [n=78; 4.6%], contralateral dTRA [n=22; 1.3%], femoral [n=6; 0.4%], ulnar [n=1; 0.1%]). There were no major vascular complications. Access site bleeding requiring treatment occurred in 0.3% (n=5) of cases. Proximal and distal radial occlusion occurred in 0.1% and 0.4%, respectively. Thirty-day major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 1.4% (n=24). Radial artery patency was 98% (630/641) at follow-up. Hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 1.73; p=0.029), an experienced operator (attending/consultant and ≥4 years' experience with dTRA; OR 2.80; p<0.001), and a low BMI (OR 1.48 per 10 unit decrease in BMI; p=0.012) were predictors of technical success.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The \\\"distal radial first\\\" approach is feasible and safe for coronary procedures. Factors associated with procedural success include increased operator experience, a low BMI, and hypertension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AsiaIntervention\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"35-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AsiaIntervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AsiaIntervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:远端经桡动脉(dTRA)通路对患者和手术者都有好处。目的:我们试图确定dTRA作为一线血管通路的可行性和安全性,并评估dTRA入路成功的预测因素。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了来自澳大利亚三个中心的连续患者(2019年11月至2023年12月),他们通过dTRA接受了冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。主要结果是手术成功(使用dTRA穿刺部位完成一例)。次要结局是通路交叉、手术安全性、随访时动脉通畅和手术成功的预测因素。结果:共纳入1692例患者(平均年龄70.6±10.5岁,男性59% [n=993],平均体重指数[BMI] 31.0±7.0 kg/m2,右侧dTRA 85%,超声引导99%)。92.2% (n= 1560)的患者首次穿刺成功,1.5%的患者第二次穿刺成功。6.3% (n=107;近端经桡骨[n=78;4.6%],对侧dTRA [n=22;1.3%],股骨[n=6;0.4%],尺侧[n=1;0.1%)。没有主要的血管并发症。0.3% (n=5)的病例发生了需要治疗的通路部位出血。近端和远端桡骨闭塞发生率分别为0.1%和0.4%。30天主要不良心血管事件发生率为1.4% (n=24)。随访时桡动脉通畅率为98%(630/641)。高血压(优势比[OR] 1.73;p=0.029),经验丰富的操作员(主治医师/顾问,有4年以上的dTRA经验;或2.80;结论:“桡骨远端优先”入路在冠状动脉手术中是可行且安全的。手术成功的相关因素包括手术经验的增加、低BMI和高血压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Distal radial first": feasibility and safety for coronary angiography and PCI in Australia.

Background: Distal transradial artery (dTRA) access offers benefits to patients and operators.

Aims: We sought to determine the feasibility and safety of the dTRA as a first-line vascular access site and to evaluate predictors of dTRA approach success.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analysed consecutive patients from three Australian centres who underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the dTRA (from November 2019 to December 2023). The primary outcome was procedural success (completion of a case using the dTRA puncture site). Secondary outcomes were access site crossover, procedural safety, arterial patency at follow-up, and predictors of procedural success.

Results: A total of 1,692 patients were included (mean age 70.6±10.5 years, 59% male [n=993], mean body mass index [BMI] 31.0±7.0 kg/m2, right dTRA 85%, ultrasound guidance 99%). First pass success was achieved in 92.2% (n=1,560) of patients, and 1.5% had success on the second puncture of the ipsilateral dTRA. Crossover was required in 6.3% (n=107; proximal transradial [n=78; 4.6%], contralateral dTRA [n=22; 1.3%], femoral [n=6; 0.4%], ulnar [n=1; 0.1%]). There were no major vascular complications. Access site bleeding requiring treatment occurred in 0.3% (n=5) of cases. Proximal and distal radial occlusion occurred in 0.1% and 0.4%, respectively. Thirty-day major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 1.4% (n=24). Radial artery patency was 98% (630/641) at follow-up. Hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 1.73; p=0.029), an experienced operator (attending/consultant and ≥4 years' experience with dTRA; OR 2.80; p<0.001), and a low BMI (OR 1.48 per 10 unit decrease in BMI; p=0.012) were predictors of technical success.

Conclusions: The "distal radial first" approach is feasible and safe for coronary procedures. Factors associated with procedural success include increased operator experience, a low BMI, and hypertension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信