IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Matthew Myers Griffith, Emma Field, Angela Song-En Huang, Tomoe Shimada, Munkhzul Battsend, Tambri Housen, Barbara Pamphilon, Martyn David Kirk
{"title":"How does learning happen in field epidemiology training programmes? A qualitative study.","authors":"Matthew Myers Griffith, Emma Field, Angela Song-En Huang, Tomoe Shimada, Munkhzul Battsend, Tambri Housen, Barbara Pamphilon, Martyn David Kirk","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06982-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite a 75-year history of building epidemiologic capacity and strengthening public health systems, the learning processes in field epidemiology training programmes (FETPs) remain unexamined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We codesigned a grounded theory and narrative inquiry qualitative study to fill this gap. The study aimed to understand the learning processes in four FETPs by describing training approaches for field epidemiologists, outlining learning strategies among trainees, and examining principles and practices that align training approaches and learning strategies. Data collection included participant observations and semi-structured interviews with FETP trainees and advisors within programmes in Australia, Japan, Mongolia, and Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed that learning occurs as trainees engage in real-world public health contexts, interacting with their people, systems, data, and knowledge. Facilitators of the learning process were learning environments (projects, routine placement work, field investigations, and courses), advisor stewardship, and trainee tenacity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings align with established and contemporary learning theories and suggest that all countries have the tools to build field epidemiology capacity and leadership. To refine these tools, governments, partners, and programme leaders should ensure access to learning environments, fortify advisor stewardship, and foster a culture of resilience among trainees. FETP is among the strongest levers to bolster the workforce for global health security before the next pandemic, and these findings reveal pathways toward better investments.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"411"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06982-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管建立流行病学能力和加强公共卫生系统已有 75 年的历史,但实地流行病学培训计划(FETPs)的学习过程仍未得到研究:我们设计了一项基础理论和叙事调查定性研究来填补这一空白。这项研究旨在通过描述现场流行病学家的培训方法、概述受训人员的学习策略,以及审查使培训方法和学习策略相一致的原则和实践,了解四个现场流行病学培训计划的学习过程。数据收集工作包括对澳大利亚、日本、蒙古和台湾的 FETP 学员和顾问进行参与式观察和半结构化访谈:结果:分析表明,学员在真实的公共卫生环境中学习,与他们的人员、系统、数据和知识互动。学习过程的促进因素包括学习环境(项目、日常实习工作、实地调查和课程)、指导教师的管理以及学员的坚韧不拔:我们的研究结果与既有的和当代的学习理论相一致,并表明所有国家都拥有建设实地流行病学能力和领导力的工具。为了完善这些工具,政府、合作伙伴和计划领导者应确保提供学习环境,加强顾问管理,并在受训人员中培养坚韧不拔的文化。在下一次流行病爆发之前,FETP 是加强全球卫生安全人才队伍的最有力杠杆之一,这些发现揭示了实现更好投资的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How does learning happen in field epidemiology training programmes? A qualitative study.

Background: Despite a 75-year history of building epidemiologic capacity and strengthening public health systems, the learning processes in field epidemiology training programmes (FETPs) remain unexamined.

Methods: We codesigned a grounded theory and narrative inquiry qualitative study to fill this gap. The study aimed to understand the learning processes in four FETPs by describing training approaches for field epidemiologists, outlining learning strategies among trainees, and examining principles and practices that align training approaches and learning strategies. Data collection included participant observations and semi-structured interviews with FETP trainees and advisors within programmes in Australia, Japan, Mongolia, and Taiwan.

Results: Analysis revealed that learning occurs as trainees engage in real-world public health contexts, interacting with their people, systems, data, and knowledge. Facilitators of the learning process were learning environments (projects, routine placement work, field investigations, and courses), advisor stewardship, and trainee tenacity.

Conclusions: Our findings align with established and contemporary learning theories and suggest that all countries have the tools to build field epidemiology capacity and leadership. To refine these tools, governments, partners, and programme leaders should ensure access to learning environments, fortify advisor stewardship, and foster a culture of resilience among trainees. FETP is among the strongest levers to bolster the workforce for global health security before the next pandemic, and these findings reveal pathways toward better investments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信