评估临床I期非小细胞肺肿瘤直径不超过2厘米的肺节段切除术与肺叶切除术的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1007/s13193-024-02080-z
Hussain Sohail Rangwala, Hareer Fatima, Muhammad Saqlain Mustafa, Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Syed Irtiza Imam, Syed Raza Abbas, Qurat Ul Ain Qazi, Muhammad Osama Iqbal
{"title":"评估临床I期非小细胞肺肿瘤直径不超过2厘米的肺节段切除术与肺叶切除术的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Hussain Sohail Rangwala, Hareer Fatima, Muhammad Saqlain Mustafa, Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Syed Irtiza Imam, Syed Raza Abbas, Qurat Ul Ain Qazi, Muhammad Osama Iqbal","doi":"10.1007/s13193-024-02080-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung cancer, which accounted for 1.8 million fatalities in 2020, necessitates the investigation of optimal surgical approaches for early-stage cases. Although lobectomy has long been associated with successful results, the growing interest in segmentectomy as an alternative procedure warrants further examination. The primary objective of this study was to compare segmentectomy with lobectomy as a viable treatment option for early-stage lung cancer. Our systematic review of NSCLC studies comparing lobectomy to segmentectomy followed the PRISMA guidelines and used a random-effects model. We extracted the patient characteristics, outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence), and postoperative complications. Statistical analyses included hazard ratios, risk ratios, sensitivity assessments, and bias evaluations, all of which were performed using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity among studies. Twelve studies involving 6049 patients revealed that segmentectomy and lobectomy demonstrated comparable overall survival (OS), with an HR of 0.99 (95% CI 0.81-1.21, <i>p</i> = 0.90). At 24 and 60 months, OS rates were RR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97, <i>p</i> = 0.0001) and RR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.03), respectively. Similarly, disease-free survival (DFS) results were comparable (HR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.86-1.19, <i>p</i> = 0.87). DFS at 24 and 60 months demonstrated RR = 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-1.0, <i>p</i> = 0.05) and RR = 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.97, <i>p</i> = 0.02), respectively. The risk of lung cancer recurrence was similar between the two groups (RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.75-1.30, <i>p</i> = 0.26). Our study revealed that segmentectomy and lobectomy had identical oncological outcomes in terms of OS and DFS. Although segmentectomy showed a slightly higher complication rate, further research is needed to draw definitive conclusions, emphasizing the importance of additional randomized trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":46707,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"16 1","pages":"279-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Outcomes in Clinical Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Tumors up to Two Centimeters in Diameter in Segmentectomy vs. Lobectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hussain Sohail Rangwala, Hareer Fatima, Muhammad Saqlain Mustafa, Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Syed Irtiza Imam, Syed Raza Abbas, Qurat Ul Ain Qazi, Muhammad Osama Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13193-024-02080-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lung cancer, which accounted for 1.8 million fatalities in 2020, necessitates the investigation of optimal surgical approaches for early-stage cases. Although lobectomy has long been associated with successful results, the growing interest in segmentectomy as an alternative procedure warrants further examination. The primary objective of this study was to compare segmentectomy with lobectomy as a viable treatment option for early-stage lung cancer. Our systematic review of NSCLC studies comparing lobectomy to segmentectomy followed the PRISMA guidelines and used a random-effects model. We extracted the patient characteristics, outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence), and postoperative complications. Statistical analyses included hazard ratios, risk ratios, sensitivity assessments, and bias evaluations, all of which were performed using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity among studies. Twelve studies involving 6049 patients revealed that segmentectomy and lobectomy demonstrated comparable overall survival (OS), with an HR of 0.99 (95% CI 0.81-1.21, <i>p</i> = 0.90). At 24 and 60 months, OS rates were RR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97, <i>p</i> = 0.0001) and RR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.03), respectively. Similarly, disease-free survival (DFS) results were comparable (HR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.86-1.19, <i>p</i> = 0.87). DFS at 24 and 60 months demonstrated RR = 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-1.0, <i>p</i> = 0.05) and RR = 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.97, <i>p</i> = 0.02), respectively. The risk of lung cancer recurrence was similar between the two groups (RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.75-1.30, <i>p</i> = 0.26). Our study revealed that segmentectomy and lobectomy had identical oncological outcomes in terms of OS and DFS. Although segmentectomy showed a slightly higher complication rate, further research is needed to draw definitive conclusions, emphasizing the importance of additional randomized trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"279-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920525/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-024-02080-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-024-02080-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺癌在2020年造成180万人死亡,因此有必要研究早期病例的最佳手术方法。虽然肺叶切除术长期以来与成功的结果有关,但对节段切除术作为替代手术的兴趣日益增加,需要进一步研究。本研究的主要目的是比较节段切除术和肺叶切除术作为早期肺癌的可行治疗选择。我们对比较肺叶切除术和节段切除术的非小细胞肺癌研究的系统综述遵循PRISMA指南并使用随机效应模型。我们提取了患者的特征、结果(总生存期、无病生存期和复发率)和术后并发症。统计分析包括风险比、风险比、敏感性评估和偏倚评估,所有这些都使用随机效应模型来解释研究之间的异质性。涉及6049例患者的12项研究显示,节段切除术和肺叶切除术的总生存率(OS)相当,HR为0.99 (95% CI 0.81-1.21, p = 0.90)。在24个月和60个月时,总生存率RR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97, p = 0.0001)和RR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.98, p = 0.03)。同样,无病生存(DFS)结果具有可比性(HR = 1.01;95% CI 0.86-1.19, p = 0.87)。24个月和60个月的DFS分别显示RR = 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-1.0, p = 0.05)和RR = 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.97, p = 0.02)。两组肺癌复发风险相似(RR = 0.98;95% CI 0.75 ~ 1.30, p = 0.26)。我们的研究表明,在OS和DFS方面,节段切除术和肺叶切除术具有相同的肿瘤预后。尽管节段切除术显示出稍高的并发症发生率,但需要进一步的研究来得出明确的结论,强调了额外随机试验的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Outcomes in Clinical Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Tumors up to Two Centimeters in Diameter in Segmentectomy vs. Lobectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Lung cancer, which accounted for 1.8 million fatalities in 2020, necessitates the investigation of optimal surgical approaches for early-stage cases. Although lobectomy has long been associated with successful results, the growing interest in segmentectomy as an alternative procedure warrants further examination. The primary objective of this study was to compare segmentectomy with lobectomy as a viable treatment option for early-stage lung cancer. Our systematic review of NSCLC studies comparing lobectomy to segmentectomy followed the PRISMA guidelines and used a random-effects model. We extracted the patient characteristics, outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence), and postoperative complications. Statistical analyses included hazard ratios, risk ratios, sensitivity assessments, and bias evaluations, all of which were performed using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity among studies. Twelve studies involving 6049 patients revealed that segmentectomy and lobectomy demonstrated comparable overall survival (OS), with an HR of 0.99 (95% CI 0.81-1.21, p = 0.90). At 24 and 60 months, OS rates were RR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97, p = 0.0001) and RR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.98, p = 0.03), respectively. Similarly, disease-free survival (DFS) results were comparable (HR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.86-1.19, p = 0.87). DFS at 24 and 60 months demonstrated RR = 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-1.0, p = 0.05) and RR = 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.97, p = 0.02), respectively. The risk of lung cancer recurrence was similar between the two groups (RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.75-1.30, p = 0.26). Our study revealed that segmentectomy and lobectomy had identical oncological outcomes in terms of OS and DFS. Although segmentectomy showed a slightly higher complication rate, further research is needed to draw definitive conclusions, emphasizing the importance of additional randomized trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to encourage and promote clinical and research activities pertaining to Surgical Oncology. It also aims to bring in the concept of multidisciplinary team approach in management of various cancers. The Journal would publish original article, point of technique, review article, case report, letter to editor, profiles of eminent teachers, surgeons and instititions - a short (up to 500 words) of the Cancer Institutions, departments, and oncologist, who founded new departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信