改善患者护理体验的组织和服务管理干预:有效性的系统评价。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Tiago S Jesus, Dongwook Lee, Manrui Zhang, Brocha Z Stern, Jan Struhar, Allen W Heinemann, Neil Jordan, Anne Deutsch
{"title":"改善患者护理体验的组织和服务管理干预:有效性的系统评价。","authors":"Tiago S Jesus, Dongwook Lee, Manrui Zhang, Brocha Z Stern, Jan Struhar, Allen W Heinemann, Neil Jordan, Anne Deutsch","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare managers and administrators increasingly need to develop systems, structures and operations capable of improving the patient experience performance of their organisations or service delivery units.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To systematically review the effectiveness of organizational and service management interventions on standardized patient experience measure scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six scientific databases, speciality journals and snowballing were used to identify English-language, peer-reviewed, contemporary studies (2015-2023) that examined the impact of service management or organizational interventions on the patient experience as a primary outcome. The studies needed to include inferential statistics on standardized, patient-reported experience measures. Two independent reviewers performed the eligibility decisions and risk-of-bias appraisals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine papers were finally included. Three papers were on discrete, service-level interventions, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one pre-post study; one RCT achieved significant improvements by delaying the timing of bedside rounding versus maintaining the early morning schedule. One non-randomized controlled study and two pre-post studies addressed organisation-wide approaches. Among those, one pre-post study achieved significant improvements by having site managers meet regularly with an organizational oversight committee to compare the units' patient-experience performance and setting improvement expectations. Finally, three observational, multi-site comparative studies were included. These addressed self-reported improvement approaches, implementation of a nursing excellence certification programme, and implementation of Patient Experience Offices. The latter was significantly associated with improved patient experience performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Selected discrete service-level interventions and organizational approaches can lead to better patient experience outcomes, even though the evidence from the pre-post and observational studies should be interpreted with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational and Service Management Interventions for Improving the Patient Experience With Care: Systematic Review of the Effectiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Tiago S Jesus, Dongwook Lee, Manrui Zhang, Brocha Z Stern, Jan Struhar, Allen W Heinemann, Neil Jordan, Anne Deutsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpm.3916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare managers and administrators increasingly need to develop systems, structures and operations capable of improving the patient experience performance of their organisations or service delivery units.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To systematically review the effectiveness of organizational and service management interventions on standardized patient experience measure scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six scientific databases, speciality journals and snowballing were used to identify English-language, peer-reviewed, contemporary studies (2015-2023) that examined the impact of service management or organizational interventions on the patient experience as a primary outcome. The studies needed to include inferential statistics on standardized, patient-reported experience measures. Two independent reviewers performed the eligibility decisions and risk-of-bias appraisals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine papers were finally included. Three papers were on discrete, service-level interventions, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one pre-post study; one RCT achieved significant improvements by delaying the timing of bedside rounding versus maintaining the early morning schedule. One non-randomized controlled study and two pre-post studies addressed organisation-wide approaches. Among those, one pre-post study achieved significant improvements by having site managers meet regularly with an organizational oversight committee to compare the units' patient-experience performance and setting improvement expectations. Finally, three observational, multi-site comparative studies were included. These addressed self-reported improvement approaches, implementation of a nursing excellence certification programme, and implementation of Patient Experience Offices. The latter was significantly associated with improved patient experience performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Selected discrete service-level interventions and organizational approaches can lead to better patient experience outcomes, even though the evidence from the pre-post and observational studies should be interpreted with caution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3916\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗管理人员和行政人员越来越需要开发能够改善组织或服务交付单位的患者体验绩效的系统、结构和操作。目的:系统回顾组织和服务管理干预对标准化患者体验测量评分的有效性。方法:使用6个科学数据库、专业期刊和滚雪球法来确定2015-2023年的英语、同行评审的当代研究,这些研究将服务管理或组织干预对患者体验的影响作为主要结果。这些研究需要包括标准化的、病人报告的经验措施的推断统计。两名独立的审稿人进行了资格决定和偏倚风险评估。结果:最终纳入9篇论文。三篇论文是关于离散的、服务水平的干预措施,包括两项随机对照试验(rct)和一项前后研究;一项随机对照试验通过推迟床边查房时间而不是维持清晨时间表取得了显著的改善。一项非随机对照研究和两项前后研究涉及组织范围的方法。其中,一项事后研究通过让现场管理人员定期与组织监督委员会会面,比较各单位的患者体验表现并设定改进期望,取得了显著的改善。最后,纳入了三个观察性的多地点比较研究。这些措施涉及自我报告的改进方法、卓越护理认证计划的实施以及患者体验办公室的实施。后者与改善患者体验表现显著相关。结论:选择离散的服务水平干预和组织方法可以带来更好的患者体验结果,即使来自前后和观察性研究的证据应该谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organizational and Service Management Interventions for Improving the Patient Experience With Care: Systematic Review of the Effectiveness.

Background: Healthcare managers and administrators increasingly need to develop systems, structures and operations capable of improving the patient experience performance of their organisations or service delivery units.

Aim: To systematically review the effectiveness of organizational and service management interventions on standardized patient experience measure scores.

Methods: Six scientific databases, speciality journals and snowballing were used to identify English-language, peer-reviewed, contemporary studies (2015-2023) that examined the impact of service management or organizational interventions on the patient experience as a primary outcome. The studies needed to include inferential statistics on standardized, patient-reported experience measures. Two independent reviewers performed the eligibility decisions and risk-of-bias appraisals.

Results: Nine papers were finally included. Three papers were on discrete, service-level interventions, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one pre-post study; one RCT achieved significant improvements by delaying the timing of bedside rounding versus maintaining the early morning schedule. One non-randomized controlled study and two pre-post studies addressed organisation-wide approaches. Among those, one pre-post study achieved significant improvements by having site managers meet regularly with an organizational oversight committee to compare the units' patient-experience performance and setting improvement expectations. Finally, three observational, multi-site comparative studies were included. These addressed self-reported improvement approaches, implementation of a nursing excellence certification programme, and implementation of Patient Experience Offices. The latter was significantly associated with improved patient experience performance.

Conclusion: Selected discrete service-level interventions and organizational approaches can lead to better patient experience outcomes, even though the evidence from the pre-post and observational studies should be interpreted with caution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信