{"title":"COVID期间延迟细胞减少手术患者的肿瘤预后","authors":"Debabrata Barmon, Eshwarya Jessy Kaur, Upasana Baruah, Dimpy Begum, Partha Sarthi Roy, Duncan Khanikar, Mouchumee Bhattacharyya, Shiraj Ahmed, Mahendra Kumar, Sharda Patra, Ratnadeep Sharma","doi":"10.1007/s13193-024-02083-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ESMO ESGO guidelines recommend standard 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC); however, the ideal number of cycles is still debatable. Literature regarding survival after 5 or more cycles is conflicting. COVID pandemic saw several oncosurgeries postponed due to healthcare crises. The present study was undertaken to evaluate oncological outcomes in patients undergoing delayed cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. This was a hospital-based, retrospective, observational study done at tertiary cancer institute. Objectives were to evaluate progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to timing of surgery and to identify prognostic factors for OS and PFS. The study group included patients undergoing delayed CRS (defined as CRS done after more than 5 cycles of NACT), and the control group is comprised of CRS done after 3-4 cycles NACT. A total of 29 patients underwent delayed CRS. Of these, 58% (<i>n</i> = 17) patients had COVID-related causes for delay in surgery. On comparing with the control group (<i>n</i> = 98), the study group had lower rates of complete cytoreduction (50% vs 71%, <i>p</i> = 0.012). Similarly complete chemotherapy response score was observed in lower proportion of delayed CRS (24.13% vs 28.15%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Mean CA 125 levels were 89.32 and 148.45 in cases and controls respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.090). PFS of the patients with delayed CRS (7 months) versus the interval CRS group (16 months) showed a statistically significant difference between the two group (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). Also, the OS for the control group was longer (55 months) than cases (34 months) (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001). Administration of additional cycles of chemotherapy beyond 3-4 cycles seemed to decrease survival in Ovarian Cancer patients. This approach however, may be beneficial in increasing the survival of patients who are deemed inoperable after 3-4 cycles of chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46707,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"16 1","pages":"251-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Delayed Cytoreductive Surgery During COVID Times.\",\"authors\":\"Debabrata Barmon, Eshwarya Jessy Kaur, Upasana Baruah, Dimpy Begum, Partha Sarthi Roy, Duncan Khanikar, Mouchumee Bhattacharyya, Shiraj Ahmed, Mahendra Kumar, Sharda Patra, Ratnadeep Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13193-024-02083-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ESMO ESGO guidelines recommend standard 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC); however, the ideal number of cycles is still debatable. Literature regarding survival after 5 or more cycles is conflicting. COVID pandemic saw several oncosurgeries postponed due to healthcare crises. The present study was undertaken to evaluate oncological outcomes in patients undergoing delayed cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. This was a hospital-based, retrospective, observational study done at tertiary cancer institute. Objectives were to evaluate progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to timing of surgery and to identify prognostic factors for OS and PFS. The study group included patients undergoing delayed CRS (defined as CRS done after more than 5 cycles of NACT), and the control group is comprised of CRS done after 3-4 cycles NACT. A total of 29 patients underwent delayed CRS. Of these, 58% (<i>n</i> = 17) patients had COVID-related causes for delay in surgery. On comparing with the control group (<i>n</i> = 98), the study group had lower rates of complete cytoreduction (50% vs 71%, <i>p</i> = 0.012). Similarly complete chemotherapy response score was observed in lower proportion of delayed CRS (24.13% vs 28.15%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Mean CA 125 levels were 89.32 and 148.45 in cases and controls respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.090). PFS of the patients with delayed CRS (7 months) versus the interval CRS group (16 months) showed a statistically significant difference between the two group (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). Also, the OS for the control group was longer (55 months) than cases (34 months) (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001). Administration of additional cycles of chemotherapy beyond 3-4 cycles seemed to decrease survival in Ovarian Cancer patients. This approach however, may be beneficial in increasing the survival of patients who are deemed inoperable after 3-4 cycles of chemotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"251-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920554/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-024-02083-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-024-02083-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
ESMO ESGO指南推荐晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)标准的3-4个周期的新辅助化疗(NACT);然而,理想的周期数仍有争议。关于5个或更多周期后存活的文献是相互矛盾的。由于医疗危机,几次肿瘤手术被推迟。本研究旨在评估晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者接受延迟细胞减少手术(CRS)的肿瘤学结果。这是一项在三级癌症研究所进行的以医院为基础的回顾性观察性研究。目的是根据手术时间评估无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),并确定OS和PFS的预后因素。研究组为延迟CRS患者(定义为NACT治疗5个周期以上后完成的CRS),对照组为NACT治疗3-4个周期后完成的CRS。共有29例患者接受了延迟CRS。其中,58% (n = 17)的患者有与covid相关的原因导致手术延迟。与对照组(n = 98)相比,研究组的完全细胞减少率较低(50% vs 71%, p = 0.012)。同样,完全化疗反应评分在延迟CRS中所占比例较低(24.13% vs 28.15%, p = 0.003)。病例和对照组的CA - 125平均值分别为89.32和148.45 (p = 0.090)。延迟CRS组(7个月)与间隔CRS组(16个月)的PFS比较,两组间差异有统计学意义(p = 0.0001)。对照组生存期(55个月)长于病例生存期(34个月)(p≤0.0001)。超过3-4个化疗周期的额外化疗周期似乎会降低卵巢癌患者的生存率。然而,这种方法可能有利于增加那些在3-4个化疗周期后被认为无法手术的患者的生存率。
Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Delayed Cytoreductive Surgery During COVID Times.
ESMO ESGO guidelines recommend standard 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC); however, the ideal number of cycles is still debatable. Literature regarding survival after 5 or more cycles is conflicting. COVID pandemic saw several oncosurgeries postponed due to healthcare crises. The present study was undertaken to evaluate oncological outcomes in patients undergoing delayed cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. This was a hospital-based, retrospective, observational study done at tertiary cancer institute. Objectives were to evaluate progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to timing of surgery and to identify prognostic factors for OS and PFS. The study group included patients undergoing delayed CRS (defined as CRS done after more than 5 cycles of NACT), and the control group is comprised of CRS done after 3-4 cycles NACT. A total of 29 patients underwent delayed CRS. Of these, 58% (n = 17) patients had COVID-related causes for delay in surgery. On comparing with the control group (n = 98), the study group had lower rates of complete cytoreduction (50% vs 71%, p = 0.012). Similarly complete chemotherapy response score was observed in lower proportion of delayed CRS (24.13% vs 28.15%, p = 0.003). Mean CA 125 levels were 89.32 and 148.45 in cases and controls respectively (p = 0.090). PFS of the patients with delayed CRS (7 months) versus the interval CRS group (16 months) showed a statistically significant difference between the two group (p = 0.0001). Also, the OS for the control group was longer (55 months) than cases (34 months) (p ≤ 0.0001). Administration of additional cycles of chemotherapy beyond 3-4 cycles seemed to decrease survival in Ovarian Cancer patients. This approach however, may be beneficial in increasing the survival of patients who are deemed inoperable after 3-4 cycles of chemotherapy.
期刊介绍:
The Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to encourage and promote clinical and research activities pertaining to Surgical Oncology. It also aims to bring in the concept of multidisciplinary team approach in management of various cancers.
The Journal would publish original article, point of technique, review article, case report, letter to editor, profiles of eminent teachers, surgeons and instititions - a short (up to 500 words) of the Cancer Institutions, departments, and oncologist, who founded new departments.