术前宫颈长度对不同宫颈环扎适应症早产的差异预测效用:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nary Long, Yilin Fu, Zizhuo Wang, Ling Feng, Teng Ji
{"title":"术前宫颈长度对不同宫颈环扎适应症早产的差异预测效用:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Nary Long, Yilin Fu, Zizhuo Wang, Ling Feng, Teng Ji","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2025.2479751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the predictive utility of preoperative cervical length (CL) for preterm birth (PTB) in cervical cerclage with different surgical indications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included data from 289 pregnant women who underwent transvaginal cervical cerclage at the Wuhan Tongji Hospital (Hubei, China) between 2015 and 2024. Participants were divided into three groups according to surgical indication(s) for cerclage: history indicated (<i>n</i> = 173); ultrasound indicated (<i>n</i> = 89); and examination indicated (<i>n</i> = 27).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) revealed that preoperative CL for PTB was greater for ultrasound-indicated cerclage (AUC 0.6613, cutoff 13.5 mm) than that for history-indicated cerclage (AUC 0.5675, optimal cutoff 30.5 mm). In history-indicated cerclage, there were no difference in the rate of PTBs between preoperative CL > 30.5 mm and ≤ 30.5 mm, nor in the rate of postoperative CL ≤ 15 mm during the fourth week. In the ultrasound-indicated group, compared with preoperative CL > 13.5 mm, women with a CL ≤ 13.5 mm exhibited a higher rate of PTB (82.1% versus 48.0%; <i>p</i> < .001), and a higher rate of postoperative CL ≤ 15 mm in the fourth week (71.4% versus 37.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The correlation between preoperative CL and PTB varied depending on the indication(s) for cerclage, and changes in postoperative CL contributed to varying predictive utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"2479751"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential predictive utility of preoperative cervical length for preterm birth among various indications for cervical cerclage: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Nary Long, Yilin Fu, Zizhuo Wang, Ling Feng, Teng Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2025.2479751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the predictive utility of preoperative cervical length (CL) for preterm birth (PTB) in cervical cerclage with different surgical indications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included data from 289 pregnant women who underwent transvaginal cervical cerclage at the Wuhan Tongji Hospital (Hubei, China) between 2015 and 2024. Participants were divided into three groups according to surgical indication(s) for cerclage: history indicated (<i>n</i> = 173); ultrasound indicated (<i>n</i> = 89); and examination indicated (<i>n</i> = 27).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) revealed that preoperative CL for PTB was greater for ultrasound-indicated cerclage (AUC 0.6613, cutoff 13.5 mm) than that for history-indicated cerclage (AUC 0.5675, optimal cutoff 30.5 mm). In history-indicated cerclage, there were no difference in the rate of PTBs between preoperative CL > 30.5 mm and ≤ 30.5 mm, nor in the rate of postoperative CL ≤ 15 mm during the fourth week. In the ultrasound-indicated group, compared with preoperative CL > 13.5 mm, women with a CL ≤ 13.5 mm exhibited a higher rate of PTB (82.1% versus 48.0%; <i>p</i> < .001), and a higher rate of postoperative CL ≤ 15 mm in the fourth week (71.4% versus 37.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The correlation between preoperative CL and PTB varied depending on the indication(s) for cerclage, and changes in postoperative CL contributed to varying predictive utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"2479751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2025.2479751\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2025.2479751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨术前宫颈长度(CL)对不同手术指征宫颈环扎术后早产(PTB)的预测价值。方法:本研究纳入了2015年至2024年在中国湖北省武汉市同济医院接受阴道宫颈环切术的289名孕妇的数据。参与者根据环扎术的手术指征分为三组:有病史(n = 173);超声指示(n = 89);检查显示(n = 27)。结果:受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)显示,超声指示的环切术术前CL (AUC 0.6613,截点13.5 mm)大于病史指示的环切术(AUC 0.5675,最佳截点30.5 mm)。在历史指示的环切中,术前CL bb0 30.5 mm和≤30.5 mm的ptb发生率无差异,术后第四周CL≤15 mm的发生率也无差异。在超声指示组中,与术前CL≤13.5 mm相比,CL≤13.5 mm的妇女患PTB的比例更高(82.1%对48.0%;p = 0.009)。结论:术前CL与PTB的相关性取决于环扎术的适应症,术后CL的变化有助于不同的预测效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential predictive utility of preoperative cervical length for preterm birth among various indications for cervical cerclage: a retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: To investigate the predictive utility of preoperative cervical length (CL) for preterm birth (PTB) in cervical cerclage with different surgical indications.

Methods: This study included data from 289 pregnant women who underwent transvaginal cervical cerclage at the Wuhan Tongji Hospital (Hubei, China) between 2015 and 2024. Participants were divided into three groups according to surgical indication(s) for cerclage: history indicated (n = 173); ultrasound indicated (n = 89); and examination indicated (n = 27).

Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) revealed that preoperative CL for PTB was greater for ultrasound-indicated cerclage (AUC 0.6613, cutoff 13.5 mm) than that for history-indicated cerclage (AUC 0.5675, optimal cutoff 30.5 mm). In history-indicated cerclage, there were no difference in the rate of PTBs between preoperative CL > 30.5 mm and ≤ 30.5 mm, nor in the rate of postoperative CL ≤ 15 mm during the fourth week. In the ultrasound-indicated group, compared with preoperative CL > 13.5 mm, women with a CL ≤ 13.5 mm exhibited a higher rate of PTB (82.1% versus 48.0%; p < .001), and a higher rate of postoperative CL ≤ 15 mm in the fourth week (71.4% versus 37.5%; p = 0.009).

Conclusion: The correlation between preoperative CL and PTB varied depending on the indication(s) for cerclage, and changes in postoperative CL contributed to varying predictive utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信