心理健康服务提供者在通过远程医疗开处方时遇到的挑战和解决方案:半结构式访谈的内容分析。

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.2196/65419
Julia Ivanova, Mollie R Cummins, Hiral Soni, Triton Ong, Brian E Bunnell, Esteban López, Brandon M Welch
{"title":"心理健康服务提供者在通过远程医疗开处方时遇到的挑战和解决方案:半结构式访谈的内容分析。","authors":"Julia Ivanova, Mollie R Cummins, Hiral Soni, Triton Ong, Brian E Bunnell, Esteban López, Brandon M Welch","doi":"10.2196/65419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States extended regulatory flexibilities to make telemedicine more accessible to providers and patients. Some of these flexibilities allowed providers to intake patients over telemedicine and prescribe certain scheduled medications without an in-person visit.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to understand providers' parameters for their comfort in prescribing over telemedicine and report on solutions providers have adopted in response to potential barriers and challenges in prescribing via telemedicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a larger mixed methods study between February and April 2024, we conducted 16 semistructured interviews with mental health providers who prescribe via telemedicine within the United States. We used the results of a web-based, cross-sectional survey to develop a codebook and support recruitment. We analyzed a subsection of the 16 interviews using content analysis to capture comfort, barriers, and workarounds in telemedicine prescribing. We reported codes by frequency and by provider.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were typically male (11/16, 69%), provided care mostly or completely over telemedicine (11/16, 69%), and were psychiatrists (8/16, 50%) or other physician (3/16, 19%). Providers' primary states (10/16, 62%) of practice included Oregon, Texas, New York, and California. The content analysis yielded a total of 234 codes, with three main codes-comfort (98/234, 41.9%), barriers or challenges (85/234, 36.3%), and workarounds or solutions (27/234, 11.5%)-and two subcodes-uncomfortable prescribing (30/98, 31%) and comfortable prescribing (68/98, 69%) over telemedicine. Participants reported being comfortable prescribing over telemedicine as long as they could meet their main parameters of working within their expertise, having access to needed patient health information, and being compliant with rules and regulations. Participants reported frustrations with e-prescription workflows and miscommunications with pharmacies. Solutions to ease frustrations and alleviate discomforts in prescribing over telemedicine included developing workflows to help patients complete laboratory tests and physical examinations and directly communicating with pharmacies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By applying content analysis to the semistructured provider interviews, we found that physicians are comfortable prescribing via telemedicine when they feel they are practicing within their personal parameters for safety. While many providers experience frustrations such as miscommunication with pharmacies, these barriers appear to not prevent them from telemedicine prescribing. With expected changes in 2024 and 2025 to the US laws and regulations for telemedicine prescribing, we may see changes in provider comfort in prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"12 ","pages":"e65419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental Health Providers' Challenges and Solutions in Prescribing Over Telemedicine: Content Analysis of Semistructured Interviews.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Ivanova, Mollie R Cummins, Hiral Soni, Triton Ong, Brian E Bunnell, Esteban López, Brandon M Welch\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/65419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States extended regulatory flexibilities to make telemedicine more accessible to providers and patients. Some of these flexibilities allowed providers to intake patients over telemedicine and prescribe certain scheduled medications without an in-person visit.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to understand providers' parameters for their comfort in prescribing over telemedicine and report on solutions providers have adopted in response to potential barriers and challenges in prescribing via telemedicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a larger mixed methods study between February and April 2024, we conducted 16 semistructured interviews with mental health providers who prescribe via telemedicine within the United States. We used the results of a web-based, cross-sectional survey to develop a codebook and support recruitment. We analyzed a subsection of the 16 interviews using content analysis to capture comfort, barriers, and workarounds in telemedicine prescribing. We reported codes by frequency and by provider.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were typically male (11/16, 69%), provided care mostly or completely over telemedicine (11/16, 69%), and were psychiatrists (8/16, 50%) or other physician (3/16, 19%). Providers' primary states (10/16, 62%) of practice included Oregon, Texas, New York, and California. The content analysis yielded a total of 234 codes, with three main codes-comfort (98/234, 41.9%), barriers or challenges (85/234, 36.3%), and workarounds or solutions (27/234, 11.5%)-and two subcodes-uncomfortable prescribing (30/98, 31%) and comfortable prescribing (68/98, 69%) over telemedicine. Participants reported being comfortable prescribing over telemedicine as long as they could meet their main parameters of working within their expertise, having access to needed patient health information, and being compliant with rules and regulations. Participants reported frustrations with e-prescription workflows and miscommunications with pharmacies. Solutions to ease frustrations and alleviate discomforts in prescribing over telemedicine included developing workflows to help patients complete laboratory tests and physical examinations and directly communicating with pharmacies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By applying content analysis to the semistructured provider interviews, we found that physicians are comfortable prescribing via telemedicine when they feel they are practicing within their personal parameters for safety. While many providers experience frustrations such as miscommunication with pharmacies, these barriers appear to not prevent them from telemedicine prescribing. With expected changes in 2024 and 2025 to the US laws and regulations for telemedicine prescribing, we may see changes in provider comfort in prescribing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Human Factors\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"e65419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969126/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/65419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为应对COVID-19大流行,美国扩大了监管灵活性,使提供者和患者更容易获得远程医疗。其中一些灵活性允许提供者通过远程医疗接收患者,并在不亲自就诊的情况下开出某些预定的药物。目的:我们的目的是了解供应商在远程医疗处方方面的舒适参数,并报告供应商采取的解决方案,以应对远程医疗处方的潜在障碍和挑战。方法:作为2024年2月至4月间一项大型混合方法研究的一部分,我们对美国境内通过远程医疗开处方的心理健康提供者进行了16次半结构化访谈。我们利用基于网络的横断面调查的结果开发了一个代码本并支持招聘。我们使用内容分析分析了16个访谈中的一部分,以捕捉远程医疗处方中的舒适、障碍和变通方法。我们按频率和供应商报告代码。结果:参与者通常为男性(11/16,69%),主要或完全通过远程医疗提供护理(11/16,69%),并且是精神科医生(8/16,50%)或其他医生(3/16,19%)。提供者的主要实践州(10/16,62%)包括俄勒冈州,德克萨斯州,纽约州和加利福尼亚州。内容分析共产生234个代码,其中三个主要代码:舒适(98/234,41.9%)、障碍或挑战(85/234,36.3%)和变通或解决方案(27/234,11.5%),以及两个子代码:远程医疗的不舒服处方(30/98,31%)和舒适处方(68/98,69%)。与会者报告说,只要能够满足其主要参数,即在其专业知识范围内工作,能够获得所需的患者健康信息,并遵守规则和条例,就可以放心地开远程医疗处方。参与者报告了对电子处方工作流程和与药店沟通不畅的不满。缓解远程医疗处方方面的挫折和不适的解决办法包括制定工作流程,帮助患者完成实验室测试和身体检查,以及直接与药房沟通。结论:通过对半结构化提供者访谈进行内容分析,我们发现当医生认为他们在个人参数范围内进行安全操作时,他们会很乐意通过远程医疗开具处方。虽然许多医疗服务提供者经历了与药店沟通不畅等挫折,但这些障碍似乎并没有阻止他们进行远程医疗处方。随着2024年和2025年美国远程医疗处方法律法规的变化,我们可能会看到提供者在处方方面的舒适度发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mental Health Providers' Challenges and Solutions in Prescribing Over Telemedicine: Content Analysis of Semistructured Interviews.

Background: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States extended regulatory flexibilities to make telemedicine more accessible to providers and patients. Some of these flexibilities allowed providers to intake patients over telemedicine and prescribe certain scheduled medications without an in-person visit.

Objective: We aim to understand providers' parameters for their comfort in prescribing over telemedicine and report on solutions providers have adopted in response to potential barriers and challenges in prescribing via telemedicine.

Methods: As part of a larger mixed methods study between February and April 2024, we conducted 16 semistructured interviews with mental health providers who prescribe via telemedicine within the United States. We used the results of a web-based, cross-sectional survey to develop a codebook and support recruitment. We analyzed a subsection of the 16 interviews using content analysis to capture comfort, barriers, and workarounds in telemedicine prescribing. We reported codes by frequency and by provider.

Results: Participants were typically male (11/16, 69%), provided care mostly or completely over telemedicine (11/16, 69%), and were psychiatrists (8/16, 50%) or other physician (3/16, 19%). Providers' primary states (10/16, 62%) of practice included Oregon, Texas, New York, and California. The content analysis yielded a total of 234 codes, with three main codes-comfort (98/234, 41.9%), barriers or challenges (85/234, 36.3%), and workarounds or solutions (27/234, 11.5%)-and two subcodes-uncomfortable prescribing (30/98, 31%) and comfortable prescribing (68/98, 69%) over telemedicine. Participants reported being comfortable prescribing over telemedicine as long as they could meet their main parameters of working within their expertise, having access to needed patient health information, and being compliant with rules and regulations. Participants reported frustrations with e-prescription workflows and miscommunications with pharmacies. Solutions to ease frustrations and alleviate discomforts in prescribing over telemedicine included developing workflows to help patients complete laboratory tests and physical examinations and directly communicating with pharmacies.

Conclusions: By applying content analysis to the semistructured provider interviews, we found that physicians are comfortable prescribing via telemedicine when they feel they are practicing within their personal parameters for safety. While many providers experience frustrations such as miscommunication with pharmacies, these barriers appear to not prevent them from telemedicine prescribing. With expected changes in 2024 and 2025 to the US laws and regulations for telemedicine prescribing, we may see changes in provider comfort in prescribing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信