通过反高斯分布的动态狄利克雷过程混合物对时间-事件数据中顺序处理效果的半参数检验。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jonathan A Race, Amy S Ruppert, Yvonne Efebera, Michael L Pennell
{"title":"通过反高斯分布的动态狄利克雷过程混合物对时间-事件数据中顺序处理效果的半参数检验。","authors":"Jonathan A Race, Amy S Ruppert, Yvonne Efebera, Michael L Pennell","doi":"10.1177/09622802251322986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Time-to-event data often violate the proportional hazards assumption under which the log-rank test is optimal. Such violations are especially common in the sphere of biological and medical data where heterogeneity due to unmeasured covariates or time varying effects are common. A variety of parametric survival models have been proposed in the literature which make more appropriate assumptions on the hazard function, at least for certain applications. One such model is derived from the first hitting time paradigm which assumes that a subject's event time is determined by a latent stochastic process reaching a threshold value. Several random effects specifications of the first hitting time model have also been proposed which allow for better modeling of data with unmeasured covariates. We propose a Bayesian model which loosens assumptions on the mixing distribution inherent in the random effects first hitting time models currently in use and we do so in a manner which is ideally suited for testing for effects of ordinal treatment variables. We demonstrate via a simulation study that the proposed model has better power than log-rank based methods in detecting ordinal treatment effects in the presence of nonproportional hazards. Additionally, we show that the proposed model is almost as powerful as log-rank based methods when the proportional hazards assumption holds. We also apply the proposed methodology to two biomedical data sets: a toxicity study in rodents and an observational study of cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22038,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":"9622802251322986"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semi-parametric testing for ordinal treatment effects in time-to-event data via dynamic Dirichlet process mixtures of the inverse-Gaussian distribution.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan A Race, Amy S Ruppert, Yvonne Efebera, Michael L Pennell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09622802251322986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Time-to-event data often violate the proportional hazards assumption under which the log-rank test is optimal. Such violations are especially common in the sphere of biological and medical data where heterogeneity due to unmeasured covariates or time varying effects are common. A variety of parametric survival models have been proposed in the literature which make more appropriate assumptions on the hazard function, at least for certain applications. One such model is derived from the first hitting time paradigm which assumes that a subject's event time is determined by a latent stochastic process reaching a threshold value. Several random effects specifications of the first hitting time model have also been proposed which allow for better modeling of data with unmeasured covariates. We propose a Bayesian model which loosens assumptions on the mixing distribution inherent in the random effects first hitting time models currently in use and we do so in a manner which is ideally suited for testing for effects of ordinal treatment variables. We demonstrate via a simulation study that the proposed model has better power than log-rank based methods in detecting ordinal treatment effects in the presence of nonproportional hazards. Additionally, we show that the proposed model is almost as powerful as log-rank based methods when the proportional hazards assumption holds. We also apply the proposed methodology to two biomedical data sets: a toxicity study in rodents and an observational study of cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Methods in Medical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9622802251322986\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Methods in Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802251322986\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802251322986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

时间-事件数据经常违反对数秩检验最优的比例风险假设。这种违规行为在生物和医学数据领域尤其常见,因为由于未测量的协变量或时变效应造成的异质性很常见。文献中提出了各种参数生存模型,这些模型至少在某些应用中对风险函数做出了更适当的假设。其中一个这样的模型是从首次撞击时间范式中衍生出来的,该范式假设受试者的事件时间是由达到阈值的潜在随机过程决定的。还提出了几个随机效应规范的第一次命中时间模型,允许与未测量协变量的数据更好地建模。我们提出了一个贝叶斯模型,该模型放宽了目前使用的随机效应首次命中时间模型中固有的混合分布的假设,并且我们以一种非常适合于测试顺序处理变量的效果的方式这样做。我们通过模拟研究证明,在存在非比例危险的情况下,所提出的模型比基于对数秩的方法在检测有序处理效果方面具有更好的能力。此外,我们表明,当比例风险假设成立时,所提出的模型几乎与基于对数秩的方法一样强大。我们还将提出的方法应用于两个生物医学数据集:啮齿动物的毒性研究和癌症患者的观察性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Semi-parametric testing for ordinal treatment effects in time-to-event data via dynamic Dirichlet process mixtures of the inverse-Gaussian distribution.

Time-to-event data often violate the proportional hazards assumption under which the log-rank test is optimal. Such violations are especially common in the sphere of biological and medical data where heterogeneity due to unmeasured covariates or time varying effects are common. A variety of parametric survival models have been proposed in the literature which make more appropriate assumptions on the hazard function, at least for certain applications. One such model is derived from the first hitting time paradigm which assumes that a subject's event time is determined by a latent stochastic process reaching a threshold value. Several random effects specifications of the first hitting time model have also been proposed which allow for better modeling of data with unmeasured covariates. We propose a Bayesian model which loosens assumptions on the mixing distribution inherent in the random effects first hitting time models currently in use and we do so in a manner which is ideally suited for testing for effects of ordinal treatment variables. We demonstrate via a simulation study that the proposed model has better power than log-rank based methods in detecting ordinal treatment effects in the presence of nonproportional hazards. Additionally, we show that the proposed model is almost as powerful as log-rank based methods when the proportional hazards assumption holds. We also apply the proposed methodology to two biomedical data sets: a toxicity study in rodents and an observational study of cancer patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Statistical Methods in Medical Research 医学-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
127
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical Methods in Medical Research is a peer reviewed scholarly journal and is the leading vehicle for articles in all the main areas of medical statistics and an essential reference for all medical statisticians. This unique journal is devoted solely to statistics and medicine and aims to keep professionals abreast of the many powerful statistical techniques now available to the medical profession. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信