在初级医疗中规划实施 FeNO 指导下的哮喘管理的定性分析。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
G Lewis, K Morton, M Santillo, L Yardley, K Wang, B Ainsworth, S Tonkin-Crine
{"title":"在初级医疗中规划实施 FeNO 指导下的哮喘管理的定性分析。","authors":"G Lewis, K Morton, M Santillo, L Yardley, K Wang, B Ainsworth, S Tonkin-Crine","doi":"10.1038/s41533-025-00418-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) testing is used in primary care in some areas of the UK to aid asthma diagnosis but is used less frequently for managing asthma. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) is investigating whether an intervention, including FeNO testing and a clinical algorithm, improves outcomes for patients with asthma. This study was conducted to explore potential for implementation of the intervention. The study aim was to explore views of those with a vested interest in implementing the FeNO intervention into primary care asthma reviews. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted online with individuals, including those with experience in policymaking, healthcare management, National Health Service commissioning, as healthcare professionals (HCPs) with extended roles, and patients and advocates. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted for nineteen interviews. Findings suggest complex interplay of barriers, contextual issues and facilitators. Overall, participants perceived FeNO-informed asthma management would enhance care, if used appropriately and flexibly according to context, for example planning implementation alongside remote reviews. Easier, equitable access to funded FeNO equipment would be needed for national implementation. Participants suggested motivation of all involved in future implementation may be increased by guidelines recommending FeNO, and by use of financial incentives and champions sharing best practice examples. In conclusion, financial obstacles were reiterated as a primary barrier to FeNO use. Despite barriers, facilitating implementation by harnessing prominent cost-benefits could persuade decision makers and clinicians. Findings lay early foundations for development of an implementation strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative insights into planning implementation of FeNO-guided asthma management in primary care.\",\"authors\":\"G Lewis, K Morton, M Santillo, L Yardley, K Wang, B Ainsworth, S Tonkin-Crine\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41533-025-00418-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) testing is used in primary care in some areas of the UK to aid asthma diagnosis but is used less frequently for managing asthma. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) is investigating whether an intervention, including FeNO testing and a clinical algorithm, improves outcomes for patients with asthma. This study was conducted to explore potential for implementation of the intervention. The study aim was to explore views of those with a vested interest in implementing the FeNO intervention into primary care asthma reviews. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted online with individuals, including those with experience in policymaking, healthcare management, National Health Service commissioning, as healthcare professionals (HCPs) with extended roles, and patients and advocates. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted for nineteen interviews. Findings suggest complex interplay of barriers, contextual issues and facilitators. Overall, participants perceived FeNO-informed asthma management would enhance care, if used appropriately and flexibly according to context, for example planning implementation alongside remote reviews. Easier, equitable access to funded FeNO equipment would be needed for national implementation. Participants suggested motivation of all involved in future implementation may be increased by guidelines recommending FeNO, and by use of financial incentives and champions sharing best practice examples. In conclusion, financial obstacles were reiterated as a primary barrier to FeNO use. Despite barriers, facilitating implementation by harnessing prominent cost-benefits could persuade decision makers and clinicians. Findings lay early foundations for development of an implementation strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926368/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-025-00418-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-025-00418-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在英国的一些地区,分量呼出一氧化氮(FeNO)检测被用于初级保健,以帮助诊断哮喘,但却较少用于哮喘的管理。一项随机对照试验(RCT)正在研究包括 FeNO 测试和临床算法在内的干预措施是否能改善哮喘患者的治疗效果。本研究旨在探讨实施干预措施的可能性。研究的目的是探讨那些在初级医疗哮喘复查中实施 FeNO 干预的既得利益者的观点。研究人员通过网络对个人进行了深入的半结构式访谈,访谈对象包括在政策制定、医疗保健管理、国民健康服务委托等方面有经验的人士、具有扩展角色的医疗保健专业人员 (HCP),以及患者和倡导者。对 19 个访谈进行了归纳主题分析。研究结果表明,障碍、背景问题和促进因素之间存在复杂的相互作用。总体而言,参与者认为,如果根据具体情况适当灵活地使用 FeNO,例如在计划实施远程复查的同时进行哮喘管理,将能加强护理工作。要在全国范围内实施,需要更方便、公平地获得资助的 FeNO 设备。与会者建议,可通过推荐使用 FeNO 的指南、使用经济激励措施和倡导者分享最佳实践范例等方式,提高所有参与未来实施工作的人员的积极性。总之,与会者重申资金障碍是使用 FeNO 的主要障碍。尽管存在障碍,但通过利用突出的成本效益来促进实施,可以说服决策者和临床医生。研究结果为制定实施策略奠定了早期基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qualitative insights into planning implementation of FeNO-guided asthma management in primary care.

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) testing is used in primary care in some areas of the UK to aid asthma diagnosis but is used less frequently for managing asthma. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) is investigating whether an intervention, including FeNO testing and a clinical algorithm, improves outcomes for patients with asthma. This study was conducted to explore potential for implementation of the intervention. The study aim was to explore views of those with a vested interest in implementing the FeNO intervention into primary care asthma reviews. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted online with individuals, including those with experience in policymaking, healthcare management, National Health Service commissioning, as healthcare professionals (HCPs) with extended roles, and patients and advocates. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted for nineteen interviews. Findings suggest complex interplay of barriers, contextual issues and facilitators. Overall, participants perceived FeNO-informed asthma management would enhance care, if used appropriately and flexibly according to context, for example planning implementation alongside remote reviews. Easier, equitable access to funded FeNO equipment would be needed for national implementation. Participants suggested motivation of all involved in future implementation may be increased by guidelines recommending FeNO, and by use of financial incentives and champions sharing best practice examples. In conclusion, financial obstacles were reiterated as a primary barrier to FeNO use. Despite barriers, facilitating implementation by harnessing prominent cost-benefits could persuade decision makers and clinicians. Findings lay early foundations for development of an implementation strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信