Sidre Sahin-Uzuner, Foroud Aghapour Zangeneh, Goncalo De Almeida, Oezlem Krzystek, Maria Paslak, Jakob Heimer, Ralf Gutjahr, Thomas Sartoretti, Tilo Niemann, André Euler
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣植入术前主动脉高分辨计算机断层扫描血管造影中的固定触发延迟与患者特定触发延迟:评估图像质量和血管增强的均匀性。","authors":"Sidre Sahin-Uzuner, Foroud Aghapour Zangeneh, Goncalo De Almeida, Oezlem Krzystek, Maria Paslak, Jakob Heimer, Ralf Gutjahr, Thomas Sartoretti, Tilo Niemann, André Euler","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to compare the image quality and homogeneity of vessel enhancement in high-pitch CT-angiography of the aorta (CTA) prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation between bolus tracking with a fixed trigger delay and bolus tracking with a patient-specific trigger delay.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, consecutive patients who received a CTA of the aorta prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation between January 2023 and June 2024 were included. Patients were imaged using either bolus tracking and a fixed trigger delay (Group A; 15 seconds) or bolus tracking and a patient-specific trigger delay (Group B; FAST Bolus; Siemens Healthineers AG). The same contrast injection and scan protocol were used in both groups. Vessel enhancement was measured at multiple craniocaudal locations. Subjective image quality was assessed by 2 readers using 5-point Likert scales. Likert scores were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Enhancement was assessed with a mixed-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five patients (28 females) were assessed in each group. Patient demographics (both 74 ± 12 years; P = 0.58, body mass index: 26.0 vs 26.2 kg/m2; P = 0.79) and radiation dose (CTDIvol: 3.4 vs 3.5 mGy; P = 0.55) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Mean CT attenuation was 489 HU versus 469 HU in the ascending aorta and 428 HU versus 464 HU in the common femoral artery for fixed and patient-specific delays, respectively. Enhancement in the femoral arteries was significantly lower in the fixed delay group (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference at other vessel locations. Diagnostic image quality and enhancement at the femoral artery were rated significantly better for the patient-specific trigger delay by one reader (both P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bolus tracking with a patient-specific trigger delay improved the craniocaudal homogeneity of vessel enhancement and subjective image quality at the distal access site as compared to bolus tracking with a fixed trigger delay in high-pitch CTA prior to TAVI.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fixed Versus Patient-Specific Trigger Delay in High-Pitch Computed Tomography Angiography of the Aorta Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Assessment of Image Quality and Homogeneity of Vessel Enhancement.\",\"authors\":\"Sidre Sahin-Uzuner, Foroud Aghapour Zangeneh, Goncalo De Almeida, Oezlem Krzystek, Maria Paslak, Jakob Heimer, Ralf Gutjahr, Thomas Sartoretti, Tilo Niemann, André Euler\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to compare the image quality and homogeneity of vessel enhancement in high-pitch CT-angiography of the aorta (CTA) prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation between bolus tracking with a fixed trigger delay and bolus tracking with a patient-specific trigger delay.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, consecutive patients who received a CTA of the aorta prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation between January 2023 and June 2024 were included. Patients were imaged using either bolus tracking and a fixed trigger delay (Group A; 15 seconds) or bolus tracking and a patient-specific trigger delay (Group B; FAST Bolus; Siemens Healthineers AG). The same contrast injection and scan protocol were used in both groups. Vessel enhancement was measured at multiple craniocaudal locations. Subjective image quality was assessed by 2 readers using 5-point Likert scales. Likert scores were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Enhancement was assessed with a mixed-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five patients (28 females) were assessed in each group. Patient demographics (both 74 ± 12 years; P = 0.58, body mass index: 26.0 vs 26.2 kg/m2; P = 0.79) and radiation dose (CTDIvol: 3.4 vs 3.5 mGy; P = 0.55) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Mean CT attenuation was 489 HU versus 469 HU in the ascending aorta and 428 HU versus 464 HU in the common femoral artery for fixed and patient-specific delays, respectively. Enhancement in the femoral arteries was significantly lower in the fixed delay group (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference at other vessel locations. Diagnostic image quality and enhancement at the femoral artery were rated significantly better for the patient-specific trigger delay by one reader (both P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bolus tracking with a patient-specific trigger delay improved the craniocaudal homogeneity of vessel enhancement and subjective image quality at the distal access site as compared to bolus tracking with a fixed trigger delay in high-pitch CTA prior to TAVI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001176\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001176","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fixed Versus Patient-Specific Trigger Delay in High-Pitch Computed Tomography Angiography of the Aorta Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Assessment of Image Quality and Homogeneity of Vessel Enhancement.
Objective: The aim of the study is to compare the image quality and homogeneity of vessel enhancement in high-pitch CT-angiography of the aorta (CTA) prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation between bolus tracking with a fixed trigger delay and bolus tracking with a patient-specific trigger delay.
Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, consecutive patients who received a CTA of the aorta prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation between January 2023 and June 2024 were included. Patients were imaged using either bolus tracking and a fixed trigger delay (Group A; 15 seconds) or bolus tracking and a patient-specific trigger delay (Group B; FAST Bolus; Siemens Healthineers AG). The same contrast injection and scan protocol were used in both groups. Vessel enhancement was measured at multiple craniocaudal locations. Subjective image quality was assessed by 2 readers using 5-point Likert scales. Likert scores were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Enhancement was assessed with a mixed-effects model.
Results: Sixty-five patients (28 females) were assessed in each group. Patient demographics (both 74 ± 12 years; P = 0.58, body mass index: 26.0 vs 26.2 kg/m2; P = 0.79) and radiation dose (CTDIvol: 3.4 vs 3.5 mGy; P = 0.55) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Mean CT attenuation was 489 HU versus 469 HU in the ascending aorta and 428 HU versus 464 HU in the common femoral artery for fixed and patient-specific delays, respectively. Enhancement in the femoral arteries was significantly lower in the fixed delay group (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference at other vessel locations. Diagnostic image quality and enhancement at the femoral artery were rated significantly better for the patient-specific trigger delay by one reader (both P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Bolus tracking with a patient-specific trigger delay improved the craniocaudal homogeneity of vessel enhancement and subjective image quality at the distal access site as compared to bolus tracking with a fixed trigger delay in high-pitch CTA prior to TAVI.
期刊介绍:
Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.