Yiwen Jiang, Hengxu Yan, Jiatong Cui, Kaiqiang Yang, Yue An
{"title":"人工智能内窥镜预测幽门螺杆菌感染:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yiwen Jiang, Hengxu Yan, Jiatong Cui, Kaiqiang Yang, Yue An","doi":"10.1111/hel.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) based on endoscopy for detecting <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) infection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies published up to January 10, 2025. The selected studies focused on the diagnostic accuracy of AI in detecting <i>H. pylori</i>. A bivariate random-effects model was employed to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity, both presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Study heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 604 studies identified, 16 studies (25,002 images or patients) were included. For the internal validation set, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for detecting <i>H. pylori</i> were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84–0.95), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86–0.94), and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94–0.97), respectively. For the external validation set, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86–0.95), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90–0.97), and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99). For junior clinicians, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66–0.83), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70–0.80), and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77–0.84). For senior clinicians, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74–0.86), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.91), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90–0.94).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Endoscopy-based AI demonstrates higher diagnostic performance compared to both junior and senior endoscopists. However, the high heterogeneity among studies limits the strength of these findings, and further research with external validation datasets is necessary to confirm the results.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13223,"journal":{"name":"Helicobacter","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy for Predicting Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yiwen Jiang, Hengxu Yan, Jiatong Cui, Kaiqiang Yang, Yue An\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hel.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) based on endoscopy for detecting <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) infection.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies published up to January 10, 2025. The selected studies focused on the diagnostic accuracy of AI in detecting <i>H. pylori</i>. A bivariate random-effects model was employed to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity, both presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Study heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistic.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 604 studies identified, 16 studies (25,002 images or patients) were included. For the internal validation set, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for detecting <i>H. pylori</i> were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84–0.95), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86–0.94), and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94–0.97), respectively. For the external validation set, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86–0.95), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90–0.97), and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99). For junior clinicians, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66–0.83), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70–0.80), and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77–0.84). For senior clinicians, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74–0.86), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.91), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90–0.94).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Endoscopy-based AI demonstrates higher diagnostic performance compared to both junior and senior endoscopists. However, the high heterogeneity among studies limits the strength of these findings, and further research with external validation datasets is necessary to confirm the results.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Helicobacter\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Helicobacter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hel.70026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Helicobacter","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hel.70026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy for Predicting Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Purpose
This meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) based on endoscopy for detecting Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies published up to January 10, 2025. The selected studies focused on the diagnostic accuracy of AI in detecting H. pylori. A bivariate random-effects model was employed to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity, both presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.
Results
Of 604 studies identified, 16 studies (25,002 images or patients) were included. For the internal validation set, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for detecting H. pylori were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84–0.95), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86–0.94), and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94–0.97), respectively. For the external validation set, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86–0.95), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90–0.97), and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99). For junior clinicians, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66–0.83), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70–0.80), and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77–0.84). For senior clinicians, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74–0.86), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.91), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90–0.94).
Conclusions
Endoscopy-based AI demonstrates higher diagnostic performance compared to both junior and senior endoscopists. However, the high heterogeneity among studies limits the strength of these findings, and further research with external validation datasets is necessary to confirm the results.
期刊介绍:
Helicobacter is edited by Professor David Y Graham. The editorial and peer review process is an independent process. Whenever there is a conflict of interest, the editor and editorial board will declare their interests and affiliations. Helicobacter recognises the critical role that has been established for Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, and primary gastric lymphoma. As new helicobacter species are now regularly being discovered, Helicobacter covers the entire range of helicobacter research, increasing communication among the fields of gastroenterology; microbiology; vaccine development; laboratory animal science.