通过综合GHSI、MCDM和聚类模型对西亚卫生安全的基于收入的分析

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2025-03-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.159002.1
Adel A Nasser, Abed Saif Ahmed Alghawli, Salem Saleh, Amani A K Elsayed
{"title":"通过综合GHSI、MCDM和聚类模型对西亚卫生安全的基于收入的分析","authors":"Adel A Nasser, Abed Saif Ahmed Alghawli, Salem Saleh, Amani A K Elsayed","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.159002.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Infectious diseases present significant challenges to global health security in contemporary, interconnected global environments. This study aimed to evaluate and compare health security performance in Western Asia (WA), with a focus on income group-based disparities and region-specific insights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized the Global Health Security Index (GHSI) to assess health security across 17 WA countries categorized by income level. Health security indicators for 2019 and 2021 were analyzed using the D-CRITIC method to determine the relative importance of each indicator (Global Health Security Index, 2021): https://ghsindex.org/report-model/). A combined D-CRITIC-CoCoSo framework was employed to rank the countries, followed by K-means clustering for grading. The study also investigated correlations between financial allocation's indicators and health security outcomes using Spearman's rank correlation. A comparative analysis elucidated regional disparities across income categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study highlights WA's progress in health security by prioritizing foundational health systems, detection/reporting, rapid response, and risk management. From 2019 to 2021, priorities varied by income group, with high-income countries focusing on detection, upper-middle-income countries focusing on risk environments, and low-income countries focusing on prevention. While some nations demonstrated improvement, others, such as Armenia, experienced decline, revealing persistent vulnerabilities. This study revealed significant variability in health security capacity, with both progress and setbacks among countries in different clusters. High- and upper-middle-income countries, such as Qatar and Georgia, leverage investments and international partnerships to improve their rankings, while conflict-affected, low-resource countries, including Iraq, Yemen, and Syria, face stagnation or decline. Strong correlations were observed between financial resource allocation indicators and health performance. Higher investments in countries like Armenia and Georgia led to significantly improved health outcomes, while minimal spending in Syria and Yemen weakened their resilience to health threats.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disparities in health resilience persist, underscoring the need for equitable resource allocation and regional cooperation to enhance public health security.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Income-Based analysis of health security in Western Asia through an integrated GHSI, MCDM, and Clustering Model.\",\"authors\":\"Adel A Nasser, Abed Saif Ahmed Alghawli, Salem Saleh, Amani A K Elsayed\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/f1000research.159002.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Infectious diseases present significant challenges to global health security in contemporary, interconnected global environments. This study aimed to evaluate and compare health security performance in Western Asia (WA), with a focus on income group-based disparities and region-specific insights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized the Global Health Security Index (GHSI) to assess health security across 17 WA countries categorized by income level. Health security indicators for 2019 and 2021 were analyzed using the D-CRITIC method to determine the relative importance of each indicator (Global Health Security Index, 2021): https://ghsindex.org/report-model/). A combined D-CRITIC-CoCoSo framework was employed to rank the countries, followed by K-means clustering for grading. The study also investigated correlations between financial allocation's indicators and health security outcomes using Spearman's rank correlation. A comparative analysis elucidated regional disparities across income categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study highlights WA's progress in health security by prioritizing foundational health systems, detection/reporting, rapid response, and risk management. From 2019 to 2021, priorities varied by income group, with high-income countries focusing on detection, upper-middle-income countries focusing on risk environments, and low-income countries focusing on prevention. While some nations demonstrated improvement, others, such as Armenia, experienced decline, revealing persistent vulnerabilities. This study revealed significant variability in health security capacity, with both progress and setbacks among countries in different clusters. High- and upper-middle-income countries, such as Qatar and Georgia, leverage investments and international partnerships to improve their rankings, while conflict-affected, low-resource countries, including Iraq, Yemen, and Syria, face stagnation or decline. Strong correlations were observed between financial resource allocation indicators and health performance. Higher investments in countries like Armenia and Georgia led to significantly improved health outcomes, while minimal spending in Syria and Yemen weakened their resilience to health threats.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disparities in health resilience persist, underscoring the need for equitable resource allocation and regional cooperation to enhance public health security.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"F1000Research\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923535/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"F1000Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.159002.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.159002.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:在当今相互关联的全球环境中,传染病对全球卫生安全构成重大挑战。本研究旨在评估和比较西亚(WA)的卫生安全绩效,重点关注基于收入群体的差异和特定区域的见解。方法:本研究利用全球健康安全指数(GHSI)来评估按收入水平分类的17个西澳国家的健康安全。使用D-CRITIC方法分析2019年和2021年的卫生安全指标,以确定每个指标的相对重要性(全球卫生安全指数,2021年):https://ghsindex.org/report-model/)。采用d - critical - cocoso组合框架对国家进行排名,然后采用k均值聚类进行分级。本研究还利用斯皮尔曼秩相关法研究了财政拨款指标与卫生安全结果之间的相关性。一项比较分析阐明了不同收入类别的地区差异。结果:本研究通过优先考虑基础卫生系统、检测/报告、快速反应和风险管理,突出了西澳大利亚州在卫生安全方面的进展。从2019年到2021年,不同收入群体的优先事项各不相同,高收入国家侧重于发现,中高收入国家侧重于风险环境,低收入国家侧重于预防。虽然一些国家表现出改善,但其他国家,如亚美尼亚,则出现了下降,显示出持续的脆弱性。这项研究揭示了卫生安全能力的显著差异,不同集群国家之间既有进步,也有倒退。卡塔尔和格鲁吉亚等中高收入国家利用投资和国际伙伴关系提高了排名,而伊拉克、也门和叙利亚等受冲突影响、资源匮乏的国家则面临增长停滞或下滑的局面。财政资源分配指标与卫生绩效之间存在很强的相关性。在亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚等国增加投资显著改善了卫生成果,而在叙利亚和也门的最低支出削弱了它们对卫生威胁的抵御能力。结论:卫生应变能力方面的差异仍然存在,强调需要公平分配资源和区域合作,以加强公共卫生安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Income-Based analysis of health security in Western Asia through an integrated GHSI, MCDM, and Clustering Model.

Objectives: Infectious diseases present significant challenges to global health security in contemporary, interconnected global environments. This study aimed to evaluate and compare health security performance in Western Asia (WA), with a focus on income group-based disparities and region-specific insights.

Methods: This study utilized the Global Health Security Index (GHSI) to assess health security across 17 WA countries categorized by income level. Health security indicators for 2019 and 2021 were analyzed using the D-CRITIC method to determine the relative importance of each indicator (Global Health Security Index, 2021): https://ghsindex.org/report-model/). A combined D-CRITIC-CoCoSo framework was employed to rank the countries, followed by K-means clustering for grading. The study also investigated correlations between financial allocation's indicators and health security outcomes using Spearman's rank correlation. A comparative analysis elucidated regional disparities across income categories.

Results: This study highlights WA's progress in health security by prioritizing foundational health systems, detection/reporting, rapid response, and risk management. From 2019 to 2021, priorities varied by income group, with high-income countries focusing on detection, upper-middle-income countries focusing on risk environments, and low-income countries focusing on prevention. While some nations demonstrated improvement, others, such as Armenia, experienced decline, revealing persistent vulnerabilities. This study revealed significant variability in health security capacity, with both progress and setbacks among countries in different clusters. High- and upper-middle-income countries, such as Qatar and Georgia, leverage investments and international partnerships to improve their rankings, while conflict-affected, low-resource countries, including Iraq, Yemen, and Syria, face stagnation or decline. Strong correlations were observed between financial resource allocation indicators and health performance. Higher investments in countries like Armenia and Georgia led to significantly improved health outcomes, while minimal spending in Syria and Yemen weakened their resilience to health threats.

Conclusion: Disparities in health resilience persist, underscoring the need for equitable resource allocation and regional cooperation to enhance public health security.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信