青少年慢性疼痛依恋:认知评价在依恋安全、疼痛应对和功能关系中的中介作用。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Nicole Harte, Olivia Noon, Andreea Heriseanu, Blake F. Dear, Joanne Dudeney
{"title":"青少年慢性疼痛依恋:认知评价在依恋安全、疼痛应对和功能关系中的中介作用。","authors":"Nicole Harte,&nbsp;Olivia Noon,&nbsp;Andreea Heriseanu,&nbsp;Blake F. Dear,&nbsp;Joanne Dudeney","doi":"10.1002/ejp.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Attachment styles can influence how individuals perceive and cope with chronic pain. This study examined the relationships between attachment security, pain coping and functioning in young adults with chronic pain, focusing on the mediating role of cognitive appraisals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study included 206 young adults attending university aged 17–29 with chronic pain (<i>M</i>age = 19.24, <i>SD</i> = 2.03) and 346 without pain (<i>M</i>age = 19.11, <i>SD</i> = 1.79). Participants completed measures assessing pain characteristics, attachment security, pain coping strategies, physical and social functioning and cognitive appraisals relating to bodily and social threat bias and pain catastrophising. SPSS PROCESS macro was used to test mediational hypotheses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Young adults with chronic pain had greater insecure attachment than controls (Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> = 41639.50, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Insecure attachment was significantly associated with poorer solution-focused coping and social functioning (<i>r</i> = −0.330 and − 0.355 respectively), and increased emotion-focused avoidance (<i>r</i> = 0.317). Social threat bias partially mediated the effects of attachment security on emotion-focused avoidance and social functioning. Pain catastrophising partially mediated the effects of attachment security on solution-focused coping and social functioning, and fully mediated its effects on emotion-focused avoidance. An indirect effect of attachment security on reframing and distraction was found via social threat and pain catastrophising.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Insecure attachment is heightened in young adults with chronic pain and may contribute to poorer pain coping and social functioning through cognitive appraisals, specifically social threat and pain catastrophising. These may be useful targets for intervention.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attachment in Young Adults With Chronic Pain: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Appraisals in the Relationship Between Attachment Security, Pain Coping and Functioning\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Harte,&nbsp;Olivia Noon,&nbsp;Andreea Heriseanu,&nbsp;Blake F. Dear,&nbsp;Joanne Dudeney\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejp.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Attachment styles can influence how individuals perceive and cope with chronic pain. This study examined the relationships between attachment security, pain coping and functioning in young adults with chronic pain, focusing on the mediating role of cognitive appraisals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This cross-sectional study included 206 young adults attending university aged 17–29 with chronic pain (<i>M</i>age = 19.24, <i>SD</i> = 2.03) and 346 without pain (<i>M</i>age = 19.11, <i>SD</i> = 1.79). Participants completed measures assessing pain characteristics, attachment security, pain coping strategies, physical and social functioning and cognitive appraisals relating to bodily and social threat bias and pain catastrophising. SPSS PROCESS macro was used to test mediational hypotheses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Young adults with chronic pain had greater insecure attachment than controls (Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> = 41639.50, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Insecure attachment was significantly associated with poorer solution-focused coping and social functioning (<i>r</i> = −0.330 and − 0.355 respectively), and increased emotion-focused avoidance (<i>r</i> = 0.317). Social threat bias partially mediated the effects of attachment security on emotion-focused avoidance and social functioning. Pain catastrophising partially mediated the effects of attachment security on solution-focused coping and social functioning, and fully mediated its effects on emotion-focused avoidance. An indirect effect of attachment security on reframing and distraction was found via social threat and pain catastrophising.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Insecure attachment is heightened in young adults with chronic pain and may contribute to poorer pain coping and social functioning through cognitive appraisals, specifically social threat and pain catastrophising. These may be useful targets for intervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926775/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:依恋类型可以影响个体如何感知和应对慢性疼痛。本研究探讨了青少年慢性疼痛患者的依恋安全、疼痛应对和功能之间的关系,重点研究了认知评价的中介作用。方法:本横断面研究纳入206例17-29岁有慢性疼痛症状的大学生(Mage = 19.24, SD = 2.03)和346例无疼痛症状的大学生(Mage = 19.11, SD = 1.79)。参与者完成了评估疼痛特征、依恋安全性、疼痛应对策略、身体和社会功能以及与身体和社会威胁偏见和疼痛灾难相关的认知评估的测试。采用SPSS PROCESS宏对中介假设进行检验。结果:慢性疼痛青年患者的不安全依恋显著高于对照组(Mann-Whitney U = 41639.50, p)。结论:慢性疼痛青年患者的不安全依恋显著增强,并可能通过认知评价导致其较差的疼痛应对能力和社会功能,特别是社会威胁和疼痛灾难。这些可能是有用的干预目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Attachment in Young Adults With Chronic Pain: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Appraisals in the Relationship Between Attachment Security, Pain Coping and Functioning

Attachment in Young Adults With Chronic Pain: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Appraisals in the Relationship Between Attachment Security, Pain Coping and Functioning

Background

Attachment styles can influence how individuals perceive and cope with chronic pain. This study examined the relationships between attachment security, pain coping and functioning in young adults with chronic pain, focusing on the mediating role of cognitive appraisals.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 206 young adults attending university aged 17–29 with chronic pain (Mage = 19.24, SD = 2.03) and 346 without pain (Mage = 19.11, SD = 1.79). Participants completed measures assessing pain characteristics, attachment security, pain coping strategies, physical and social functioning and cognitive appraisals relating to bodily and social threat bias and pain catastrophising. SPSS PROCESS macro was used to test mediational hypotheses.

Results

Young adults with chronic pain had greater insecure attachment than controls (Mann–Whitney U = 41639.50, p < 0.001). Insecure attachment was significantly associated with poorer solution-focused coping and social functioning (r = −0.330 and − 0.355 respectively), and increased emotion-focused avoidance (r = 0.317). Social threat bias partially mediated the effects of attachment security on emotion-focused avoidance and social functioning. Pain catastrophising partially mediated the effects of attachment security on solution-focused coping and social functioning, and fully mediated its effects on emotion-focused avoidance. An indirect effect of attachment security on reframing and distraction was found via social threat and pain catastrophising.

Conclusions

Insecure attachment is heightened in young adults with chronic pain and may contribute to poorer pain coping and social functioning through cognitive appraisals, specifically social threat and pain catastrophising. These may be useful targets for intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信