国家器官获取和移植网络心脏分配政策:6年后。

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Circulation: Heart Failure Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011631
Lauren K Truby, Liviu Klein, Jane E Wilcox, Maryjane Farr
{"title":"国家器官获取和移植网络心脏分配政策:6年后。","authors":"Lauren K Truby, Liviu Klein, Jane E Wilcox, Maryjane Farr","doi":"10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2014, the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network began reappraisal of the United States heart transplant allocation policy. Driven by ongoing discordance between organ supply and demand, high waitlist mortality, and increasing exception requests, the Thoracic Committee radically redesigned the priority scheme and drafted a 6-tiered algorithm, included durable device complications into policy, expanded broader sharing, and increased the number of mandatory listing variables to develop a future heart allocation score. This became the 2018 New Heart Allocation Policy. Changes in allocation priority have resulted in a significant increase in the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support in waitlisted candidates with a concomitant decrease in the number of patients bridged to transplanted with durable left ventricular assist device support. The number of exception requests continues to increase, particularly for patients listed status 2 and for multiorgan transplants. Importantly, fewer patients are being delisted for clinical improvement, suggesting missed opportunities for recovery. The current review will critically evaluate the 2018 heart allocation policy 6 years later, briefly focusing on the history of heart allocation in the United States, the current and evolving algorithms for candidate prioritization including continuous distribution, the impact of technology and innovation on transplant rates and future policy development, and the ongoing regulatory oversight and governance changes in the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network.</p>","PeriodicalId":10196,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"e011631"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12173783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Organ Procurement and Transplant Network Heart Allocation Policy: 6 Years Later.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren K Truby, Liviu Klein, Jane E Wilcox, Maryjane Farr\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2014, the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network began reappraisal of the United States heart transplant allocation policy. Driven by ongoing discordance between organ supply and demand, high waitlist mortality, and increasing exception requests, the Thoracic Committee radically redesigned the priority scheme and drafted a 6-tiered algorithm, included durable device complications into policy, expanded broader sharing, and increased the number of mandatory listing variables to develop a future heart allocation score. This became the 2018 New Heart Allocation Policy. Changes in allocation priority have resulted in a significant increase in the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support in waitlisted candidates with a concomitant decrease in the number of patients bridged to transplanted with durable left ventricular assist device support. The number of exception requests continues to increase, particularly for patients listed status 2 and for multiorgan transplants. Importantly, fewer patients are being delisted for clinical improvement, suggesting missed opportunities for recovery. The current review will critically evaluate the 2018 heart allocation policy 6 years later, briefly focusing on the history of heart allocation in the United States, the current and evolving algorithms for candidate prioritization including continuous distribution, the impact of technology and innovation on transplant rates and future policy development, and the ongoing regulatory oversight and governance changes in the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e011631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12173783/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011631\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011631","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2014年,器官获取和移植网络开始重新评估美国心脏移植分配政策。由于器官供需之间的持续不协调,等待名单死亡率高,以及不断增加的例外请求,胸科委员会从根本上重新设计了优先方案,并起草了一个6层算法,将持久的器械并发症纳入政策,扩大了更广泛的共享,并增加了强制性清单变量的数量,以制定未来的心脏分配评分。这成为2018年新的心脏分配政策。分配优先级的变化导致候选者中临时机械循环支持的使用显著增加,同时桥接移植持久左心室辅助装置支持的患者数量减少。例外申请的数量继续增加,特别是对于列在第2位的患者和多器官移植。重要的是,很少有患者因临床改善而被摘牌,这表明他们错过了康复的机会。当前的综述将批判性地评估6年后的2018年心脏分配政策,简要地关注美国心脏分配的历史,候选人优先排序的当前和不断发展的算法,包括持续分配,技术和创新对移植率和未来政策发展的影响,以及器官获取和移植网络中正在进行的监管监督和治理变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National Organ Procurement and Transplant Network Heart Allocation Policy: 6 Years Later.

In 2014, the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network began reappraisal of the United States heart transplant allocation policy. Driven by ongoing discordance between organ supply and demand, high waitlist mortality, and increasing exception requests, the Thoracic Committee radically redesigned the priority scheme and drafted a 6-tiered algorithm, included durable device complications into policy, expanded broader sharing, and increased the number of mandatory listing variables to develop a future heart allocation score. This became the 2018 New Heart Allocation Policy. Changes in allocation priority have resulted in a significant increase in the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support in waitlisted candidates with a concomitant decrease in the number of patients bridged to transplanted with durable left ventricular assist device support. The number of exception requests continues to increase, particularly for patients listed status 2 and for multiorgan transplants. Importantly, fewer patients are being delisted for clinical improvement, suggesting missed opportunities for recovery. The current review will critically evaluate the 2018 heart allocation policy 6 years later, briefly focusing on the history of heart allocation in the United States, the current and evolving algorithms for candidate prioritization including continuous distribution, the impact of technology and innovation on transplant rates and future policy development, and the ongoing regulatory oversight and governance changes in the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Heart Failure
Circulation: Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
271
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Heart Failure focuses on content related to heart failure, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant science and medicine. It considers studies conducted in humans or analyses of human data, as well as preclinical studies with direct clinical correlation or relevance. While primarily a clinical journal, it may publish novel basic and preclinical studies that significantly advance the field of heart failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信