Terrance Shoemaker, Brendan R Amer, Vladimir Razinkov, Joon Huh, Yangjie Wei, Wei Qi, Christopher J Roberts
{"title":"\"评估铰链柔性对预测的第二渗透室温系数的影响\"。","authors":"Terrance Shoemaker, Brendan R Amer, Vladimir Razinkov, Joon Huh, Yangjie Wei, Wei Qi, Christopher J Roberts","doi":"10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are a key modality for treating a range of diseases because of their unique biophysical properties, such as high binding affinity and high specificity. However, MAb solutions can have unpredictable behavior that is detrimental to the drug product including aggregation and self-association, and high viscosity at elevated protein concentrations. Coarse-grained (CG) molecular simulations provide an opportunity to probe antibody behavior and self-interactions early in development without large experimental or computational burden. Recent work used a 1-bead-per-charge with 1-bead-per-domain (1bC/D) to model a combination of screened electrostatic, steric, and short-ranged non-electrostatic interactions to accurately predict experimental protein self-interactions for MAbs but neglected the influence of MAb hinge flexibility. This work includes the effects of flexibility of the hinge region while maintaining the 1bC/D resolution and computational efficiency. The flexibility is modeled by intramolecular rotations and flexing of antibody fragments about the central hinge to capture literature results for the distribution of internal structures for a single MAb. The difference between flexible and rigid models are analyzed for two body interactions for a reasonably large data set (n = 63) of different MAbs at typical commercial solution conditions. The net behavior showed small differences for the flexible vs. rigid model for most MAbs, within the range of experimental results, with a small number of exceptions. While the overall MAb-MAb self-interactions were not largely dependent on intramolecular degrees of freedom of the hinge region, there were some predicted differences in particular amino acid pairwise interactions from flexible to rigid models, which may indicate the additional computational burden of including hinge flexibility would be useful for future work focused on protein design and extensions to high protein concentration drug development where there are multi-protein spatial correlations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"107064"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Assessing Impact of Hinge Flexibility on Predicted Second Osmotic Virial Coefficients\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Terrance Shoemaker, Brendan R Amer, Vladimir Razinkov, Joon Huh, Yangjie Wei, Wei Qi, Christopher J Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are a key modality for treating a range of diseases because of their unique biophysical properties, such as high binding affinity and high specificity. However, MAb solutions can have unpredictable behavior that is detrimental to the drug product including aggregation and self-association, and high viscosity at elevated protein concentrations. Coarse-grained (CG) molecular simulations provide an opportunity to probe antibody behavior and self-interactions early in development without large experimental or computational burden. Recent work used a 1-bead-per-charge with 1-bead-per-domain (1bC/D) to model a combination of screened electrostatic, steric, and short-ranged non-electrostatic interactions to accurately predict experimental protein self-interactions for MAbs but neglected the influence of MAb hinge flexibility. This work includes the effects of flexibility of the hinge region while maintaining the 1bC/D resolution and computational efficiency. The flexibility is modeled by intramolecular rotations and flexing of antibody fragments about the central hinge to capture literature results for the distribution of internal structures for a single MAb. The difference between flexible and rigid models are analyzed for two body interactions for a reasonably large data set (n = 63) of different MAbs at typical commercial solution conditions. The net behavior showed small differences for the flexible vs. rigid model for most MAbs, within the range of experimental results, with a small number of exceptions. While the overall MAb-MAb self-interactions were not largely dependent on intramolecular degrees of freedom of the hinge region, there were some predicted differences in particular amino acid pairwise interactions from flexible to rigid models, which may indicate the additional computational burden of including hinge flexibility would be useful for future work focused on protein design and extensions to high protein concentration drug development where there are multi-protein spatial correlations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107064\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107064\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
单克隆抗体(MAbs)具有高结合亲和力和高特异性等独特的生物物理特性,是治疗各种疾病的关键方法。然而,单克隆抗体溶液可能具有不可预测的行为,对药物产品不利,包括聚集和自结合,以及蛋白质浓度升高时的高粘度。粗粒度(CG)分子模拟提供了一个机会,可以在开发早期探究抗体的行为和自相互作用,而无需大量的实验或计算负担。最近的研究采用了每电荷 1 个微珠、每域 1 个微珠(1bC/D)的方法来模拟筛选静电、立体和短程非静电相互作用的组合,以准确预测 MAbs 的实验蛋白质自我相互作用,但忽略了 MAb 铰链灵活性的影响。这项研究在保持 1bC/D 分辨率和计算效率的前提下,纳入了铰链区灵活性的影响。通过分子内旋转和抗体片段围绕中心铰链的弯曲来模拟柔性,从而捕捉到文献中关于单个 MAb 内部结构分布的结果。在典型的商业溶液条件下,针对不同 MAb 的相当大的数据集(n = 63),分析了柔性模型和刚性模型在两体相互作用方面的差异。对于大多数 MAb 来说,柔性模型与刚性模型的净行为差异很小,在实验结果的范围内,只有少数例外。虽然MAb-MAb的整体自我相互作用在很大程度上并不取决于铰链区的分子内自由度,但从柔性模型到刚性模型,在特定氨基酸配对相互作用方面存在一些预测差异,这可能表明将铰链柔性包括在内所带来的额外计算负担将有助于未来侧重于蛋白质设计的工作,并扩展到存在多蛋白空间相关性的高蛋白浓度药物开发。
"Assessing Impact of Hinge Flexibility on Predicted Second Osmotic Virial Coefficients".
Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are a key modality for treating a range of diseases because of their unique biophysical properties, such as high binding affinity and high specificity. However, MAb solutions can have unpredictable behavior that is detrimental to the drug product including aggregation and self-association, and high viscosity at elevated protein concentrations. Coarse-grained (CG) molecular simulations provide an opportunity to probe antibody behavior and self-interactions early in development without large experimental or computational burden. Recent work used a 1-bead-per-charge with 1-bead-per-domain (1bC/D) to model a combination of screened electrostatic, steric, and short-ranged non-electrostatic interactions to accurately predict experimental protein self-interactions for MAbs but neglected the influence of MAb hinge flexibility. This work includes the effects of flexibility of the hinge region while maintaining the 1bC/D resolution and computational efficiency. The flexibility is modeled by intramolecular rotations and flexing of antibody fragments about the central hinge to capture literature results for the distribution of internal structures for a single MAb. The difference between flexible and rigid models are analyzed for two body interactions for a reasonably large data set (n = 63) of different MAbs at typical commercial solution conditions. The net behavior showed small differences for the flexible vs. rigid model for most MAbs, within the range of experimental results, with a small number of exceptions. While the overall MAb-MAb self-interactions were not largely dependent on intramolecular degrees of freedom of the hinge region, there were some predicted differences in particular amino acid pairwise interactions from flexible to rigid models, which may indicate the additional computational burden of including hinge flexibility would be useful for future work focused on protein design and extensions to high protein concentration drug development where there are multi-protein spatial correlations.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes research articles, review articles and scientific commentaries on all aspects of the pharmaceutical sciences with emphasis on conceptual novelty and scientific quality. The Editors welcome articles in this multidisciplinary field, with a focus on topics relevant for drug discovery and development.
More specifically, the Journal publishes reports on medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, drug delivery (including gene delivery), drug targeting, pharmaceutical technology, pharmaceutical biotechnology and clinical drug evaluation. The journal will typically not give priority to manuscripts focusing primarily on organic synthesis, natural products, adaptation of analytical approaches, or discussions pertaining to drug policy making.
Scientific commentaries and review articles are generally by invitation only or by consent of the Editors. Proceedings of scientific meetings may be published as special issues or supplements to the Journal.