从六件汇集的 Buffy Coat 中生产病原体灭活的双剂量血小板浓缩物的优化方案。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Marco Amato, Lisa Seekircher, Lena Tschiderer, Peter Willeit, Harald Schennach, Anita Siller
{"title":"从六件汇集的 Buffy Coat 中生产病原体灭活的双剂量血小板浓缩物的优化方案。","authors":"Marco Amato, Lisa Seekircher, Lena Tschiderer, Peter Willeit, Harald Schennach, Anita Siller","doi":"10.3343/alm.2024.0555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pooled platelet (PLT) production methods differ worldwide. In Europe, the buffy coat (BC) method is predominantly used, with four to eight BCs being pooled to produce single- or double-dose PLT products. The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) blood guide and Austrian legislation define a therapeutic PLT unit as ≥ 2 × 10<sup>11</sup> PLTs/unit. We optimized the manufacturing steps to produce doubledose PLT products from six BCs, aiming to enhance production efficiency while maintaining product quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We stepwise optimized our protocol starting from five BCs (BC5) (N=107). First, we included an additional BC (BC6) (N=110). Second, we used a hematology analyzer (Sysmex XN-1000) equipped with blood bank mode, which is a novel software application for measuring PLT counts in PLT units (BC6+XN-1000) (N=106). Third, we optimized the blood cell separator (BCS) settings to produce higher-volume BCs (BC6+XN-1000+BCS) (N=107). Fourth, we adapted the centrifugation (BC6+XN-1000+BCS+CF) (N=197). All units were pathogen-inactivated using the INTERCEPT blood system (amotosalen/ultraviolet A).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each optimization step significantly increased the yield ( × 10<sup>11</sup>/PLT concentrate) (<i>P</i> <0.001). The mean yield increased from 2.83 (SD 0.39) for BC5 to 4.81 (SD 0.58) for BC6+XN-1000+BCS+CF. The mean BC volume increased from 47.78 mL (SD 5.09) to 55.59 mL (SD 5.11) following BCS adaptions (<i>P</i> <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After stepwise protocol optimization, we could produce pathogen-inactivated double-dose PLT concentrates by pooling six BCs, complying with national regulations and EDQM quality requirements while reducing costs and minimizing blood wastage.</p>","PeriodicalId":8421,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimized Protocol for Producing Pathogen-Inactivated Double-Dose Platelet Concentrates From Six Pooled Buffy Coats.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Amato, Lisa Seekircher, Lena Tschiderer, Peter Willeit, Harald Schennach, Anita Siller\",\"doi\":\"10.3343/alm.2024.0555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pooled platelet (PLT) production methods differ worldwide. In Europe, the buffy coat (BC) method is predominantly used, with four to eight BCs being pooled to produce single- or double-dose PLT products. The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) blood guide and Austrian legislation define a therapeutic PLT unit as ≥ 2 × 10<sup>11</sup> PLTs/unit. We optimized the manufacturing steps to produce doubledose PLT products from six BCs, aiming to enhance production efficiency while maintaining product quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We stepwise optimized our protocol starting from five BCs (BC5) (N=107). First, we included an additional BC (BC6) (N=110). Second, we used a hematology analyzer (Sysmex XN-1000) equipped with blood bank mode, which is a novel software application for measuring PLT counts in PLT units (BC6+XN-1000) (N=106). Third, we optimized the blood cell separator (BCS) settings to produce higher-volume BCs (BC6+XN-1000+BCS) (N=107). Fourth, we adapted the centrifugation (BC6+XN-1000+BCS+CF) (N=197). All units were pathogen-inactivated using the INTERCEPT blood system (amotosalen/ultraviolet A).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each optimization step significantly increased the yield ( × 10<sup>11</sup>/PLT concentrate) (<i>P</i> <0.001). The mean yield increased from 2.83 (SD 0.39) for BC5 to 4.81 (SD 0.58) for BC6+XN-1000+BCS+CF. The mean BC volume increased from 47.78 mL (SD 5.09) to 55.59 mL (SD 5.11) following BCS adaptions (<i>P</i> <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After stepwise protocol optimization, we could produce pathogen-inactivated double-dose PLT concentrates by pooling six BCs, complying with national regulations and EDQM quality requirements while reducing costs and minimizing blood wastage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2024.0555\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2024.0555","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全世界的集合血小板(PLT)生产方法各不相同。在欧洲,主要使用缓冲衣(BC)法,将 4 至 8 个缓冲衣汇集在一起生产单剂量或双剂量 PLT 产品。欧洲药品与保健质量管理局(EDQM)血液指南和奥地利法律将治疗用 PLT 单位定义为≥ 2 × 1011 PLTs/单位。我们优化了用六种 BC 生产双糖 PLT 产品的生产步骤,旨在提高生产效率的同时保证产品质量:我们从 5 个 BC(BC5)(N=107)开始逐步优化我们的方案。首先,我们增加了一个 BC(BC6)(N=110)。其次,我们使用了一台配备血库模式的血液分析仪(Sysmex XN-1000),这是一款用于测量 PLT 单位 PLT 计数的新型应用软件(BC6+XN-1000)(N=106)。第三,我们优化了血细胞分离器(BCS)的设置,以产生更高容量的 BCs(BC6+XN-1000+BCS)(N=107)。第四,我们调整了离心方法(BC6+XN-1000+BCS+CF)(N=197)。所有单位均使用 INTERCEPT 血液系统(氨基水杨酸/紫外线 A)进行病原体灭活:结果:每个优化步骤都大大提高了产量(×1011/PLT 浓缩液)(P P 结论:在逐步优化方案后,我们的产量明显增加:在逐步优化方案后,我们可以通过汇集六份 BC 生产出病原体灭活的双剂量 PLT 浓缩液,既符合国家法规和 EDQM 质量要求,又降低了成本并最大限度地减少了血液浪费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimized Protocol for Producing Pathogen-Inactivated Double-Dose Platelet Concentrates From Six Pooled Buffy Coats.

Background: Pooled platelet (PLT) production methods differ worldwide. In Europe, the buffy coat (BC) method is predominantly used, with four to eight BCs being pooled to produce single- or double-dose PLT products. The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) blood guide and Austrian legislation define a therapeutic PLT unit as ≥ 2 × 1011 PLTs/unit. We optimized the manufacturing steps to produce doubledose PLT products from six BCs, aiming to enhance production efficiency while maintaining product quality.

Methods: We stepwise optimized our protocol starting from five BCs (BC5) (N=107). First, we included an additional BC (BC6) (N=110). Second, we used a hematology analyzer (Sysmex XN-1000) equipped with blood bank mode, which is a novel software application for measuring PLT counts in PLT units (BC6+XN-1000) (N=106). Third, we optimized the blood cell separator (BCS) settings to produce higher-volume BCs (BC6+XN-1000+BCS) (N=107). Fourth, we adapted the centrifugation (BC6+XN-1000+BCS+CF) (N=197). All units were pathogen-inactivated using the INTERCEPT blood system (amotosalen/ultraviolet A).

Results: Each optimization step significantly increased the yield ( × 1011/PLT concentrate) (P <0.001). The mean yield increased from 2.83 (SD 0.39) for BC5 to 4.81 (SD 0.58) for BC6+XN-1000+BCS+CF. The mean BC volume increased from 47.78 mL (SD 5.09) to 55.59 mL (SD 5.11) following BCS adaptions (P <0.001).

Conclusions: After stepwise protocol optimization, we could produce pathogen-inactivated double-dose PLT concentrates by pooling six BCs, complying with national regulations and EDQM quality requirements while reducing costs and minimizing blood wastage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Annals of Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
12.20%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Laboratory Medicine is the official journal of Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. The journal title has been recently changed from the Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine (ISSN, 1598-6535) from the January issue of 2012. The JCR 2017 Impact factor of Ann Lab Med was 1.916.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信