在Clinicaltrials.gov上注册的龋齿4期临床试验的特点。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kerim Safa Kul, Muhammet Kerim Ayar
{"title":"在Clinicaltrials.gov上注册的龋齿4期临床试验的特点。","authors":"Kerim Safa Kul, Muhammet Kerim Ayar","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05662-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental caries, a widespread chronic oral disease, is caused by multiple factors including microorganisms, genetic predisposition. Despite being preventable, it poses a significant global burden. This study reviews all phase 4 clinical trials on dental caries registered at ClinicalTrials.gov to provide a comprehensive overview of their characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was conducted on the ClinicalTrials.gov database using keywords. The registration data for all relevant phase 4 studies concerning 'Dental Caries' were retrieved. This search was conducted on the 23rd of January, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 58 phase 4 clinical trials, with most studies (67.2%) reporting complete data. The majority (63.8%) had fewer than 100 participants, and the predominant sponsors were medical institutions (77.6%). Geographically, the highest percentage of studies were conducted in South America (24.1%), with the lowest in North America (10.3%). Interventional trials primarily focused on treatment (51.7%) and prevention (41.4%), with a significant portion being randomized (93.1%). Blinding varied, with single and double blinding each used in 25.9% of studies. Drug interventions were the most common (60.6%), followed by other categories such as dietary supplements and procedures. Among drug interventions, agents containing fluoride were the largest category, accounting for 52.6% of the trials. Fluoride varnishes and silver diamine fluoride were the most frequently evaluated. Sedatives and pain relievers constituted 15.7% of the trials, with midazolam and ketamine being predominant. Other drugs accounted for 23.2% of the trials, featuring diverse substances such as inactivated poliovirus vaccine and xylitol. Dental materials and operative treatments made up 29.5% of the trials, with resin and fissure sealants being the most commonly evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis of phase 4 clinical trials highlighted fluoride as the most studied intervention for dental caries prevention. The analysis also revealed a need for further research on non-fluoride interventions and emphasized the importance of using evidence-based practices in dental care for improved oral health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"411"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of phase 4 clinical trials on Dental Caries registered at Clinicaltrials.gov.\",\"authors\":\"Kerim Safa Kul, Muhammet Kerim Ayar\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12903-025-05662-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental caries, a widespread chronic oral disease, is caused by multiple factors including microorganisms, genetic predisposition. Despite being preventable, it poses a significant global burden. This study reviews all phase 4 clinical trials on dental caries registered at ClinicalTrials.gov to provide a comprehensive overview of their characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was conducted on the ClinicalTrials.gov database using keywords. The registration data for all relevant phase 4 studies concerning 'Dental Caries' were retrieved. This search was conducted on the 23rd of January, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 58 phase 4 clinical trials, with most studies (67.2%) reporting complete data. The majority (63.8%) had fewer than 100 participants, and the predominant sponsors were medical institutions (77.6%). Geographically, the highest percentage of studies were conducted in South America (24.1%), with the lowest in North America (10.3%). Interventional trials primarily focused on treatment (51.7%) and prevention (41.4%), with a significant portion being randomized (93.1%). Blinding varied, with single and double blinding each used in 25.9% of studies. Drug interventions were the most common (60.6%), followed by other categories such as dietary supplements and procedures. Among drug interventions, agents containing fluoride were the largest category, accounting for 52.6% of the trials. Fluoride varnishes and silver diamine fluoride were the most frequently evaluated. Sedatives and pain relievers constituted 15.7% of the trials, with midazolam and ketamine being predominant. Other drugs accounted for 23.2% of the trials, featuring diverse substances such as inactivated poliovirus vaccine and xylitol. Dental materials and operative treatments made up 29.5% of the trials, with resin and fissure sealants being the most commonly evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis of phase 4 clinical trials highlighted fluoride as the most studied intervention for dental caries prevention. The analysis also revealed a need for further research on non-fluoride interventions and emphasized the importance of using evidence-based practices in dental care for improved oral health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924847/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05662-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05662-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:龋病是一种广泛存在的慢性口腔疾病,是由微生物、遗传易感性等多种因素引起的。尽管可以预防,但它构成了重大的全球负担。本研究回顾了在ClinicalTrials.gov网站上注册的所有关于龋齿的4期临床试验,以提供其特征的全面概述。方法:在ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中使用关键词进行检索。检索所有与“龋齿”相关的4期研究的注册数据。这次搜索是在2024年1月23日进行的。结果:该分析包括58项4期临床试验,大多数研究(67.2%)报告了完整的数据。参与人数在100人以下的调查占多数(63.8%),以医疗机构为主(77.6%)。从地理上看,南美洲进行的研究比例最高(24.1%),北美最低(10.3%)。干预性试验主要集中于治疗(51.7%)和预防(41.4%),其中很大一部分是随机的(93.1%)。盲法各不相同,25.9%的研究分别采用单盲法和双盲法。药物干预是最常见的(60.6%),其次是其他类别,如膳食补充剂和手术。在药物干预措施中,含氟药物是最大的类别,占试验的52.6%。氟化物清漆和二胺氟银是最常被评估的。镇静和止痛药占试验的15.7%,以咪达唑仑和氯胺酮为主。其他药物占试验的23.2%,具有多种物质,如灭活脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗和木糖醇。牙科材料和手术治疗占试验的29.5%,树脂和裂缝密封剂是最常见的评估。结论:对4期临床试验的分析表明,氟化物是预防龋齿研究最多的干预措施。分析还表明,有必要进一步研究无氟干预措施,并强调在牙科保健中采用循证做法以改善口腔健康结果的重要性。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics of phase 4 clinical trials on Dental Caries registered at Clinicaltrials.gov.

Background: Dental caries, a widespread chronic oral disease, is caused by multiple factors including microorganisms, genetic predisposition. Despite being preventable, it poses a significant global burden. This study reviews all phase 4 clinical trials on dental caries registered at ClinicalTrials.gov to provide a comprehensive overview of their characteristics.

Methods: A search was conducted on the ClinicalTrials.gov database using keywords. The registration data for all relevant phase 4 studies concerning 'Dental Caries' were retrieved. This search was conducted on the 23rd of January, 2024.

Results: The analysis included 58 phase 4 clinical trials, with most studies (67.2%) reporting complete data. The majority (63.8%) had fewer than 100 participants, and the predominant sponsors were medical institutions (77.6%). Geographically, the highest percentage of studies were conducted in South America (24.1%), with the lowest in North America (10.3%). Interventional trials primarily focused on treatment (51.7%) and prevention (41.4%), with a significant portion being randomized (93.1%). Blinding varied, with single and double blinding each used in 25.9% of studies. Drug interventions were the most common (60.6%), followed by other categories such as dietary supplements and procedures. Among drug interventions, agents containing fluoride were the largest category, accounting for 52.6% of the trials. Fluoride varnishes and silver diamine fluoride were the most frequently evaluated. Sedatives and pain relievers constituted 15.7% of the trials, with midazolam and ketamine being predominant. Other drugs accounted for 23.2% of the trials, featuring diverse substances such as inactivated poliovirus vaccine and xylitol. Dental materials and operative treatments made up 29.5% of the trials, with resin and fissure sealants being the most commonly evaluated.

Conclusion: This analysis of phase 4 clinical trials highlighted fluoride as the most studied intervention for dental caries prevention. The analysis also revealed a need for further research on non-fluoride interventions and emphasized the importance of using evidence-based practices in dental care for improved oral health outcomes.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信