碳酸盐岩脆断岩渗透率各向异性

IF 4.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
E. A. H. Michie, I. Kaminskaite-Baranauskiene
{"title":"碳酸盐岩脆断岩渗透率各向异性","authors":"E. A. H. Michie,&nbsp;I. Kaminskaite-Baranauskiene","doi":"10.1029/2024JB028763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Permeability anisotropy of fault rocks has been documented in crystalline and clastic lithologies, but rarely within carbonates. In this contribution, we investigate how a permeability anisotropy may develop within carbonate fault rocks, including deformation bands, for the purpose of improving understanding of fluid flow. A total of 43 oriented fault rock samples plugged in three orthogonal directions were taken from eight faults in differing carbonate lithofacies. The permeability was measured, with the goal of assessing if and to what extent a permeability anisotropy may develop. Key factors controlling the formation of anisotropy in these rocks were analyzed by combining petrophysical and microstructural data. All samples showed some degree of anisotropy. However, a consistent major permeability anisotropy (up to five orders of magnitude) only occurred when the same or similar lithofacies were juxtaposed, where the lowest permeability was recorded normal to fault strike in 75% of the samples. Differences occurred in the highest permeability direction dependent on lithofacies. In deformation bands within high porosity grainstones, the highest permeability was inferred to be at a low angle to σ<sub>1,</sub> created by grain and pore alignment in the direction of transport. The highest permeability in faults cutting recrystallized carbonates varied from sub-parallel to σ<sub>1</sub>, to sub-parallel to σ<sub>2</sub>, owing to variations in Riedel shears and fracture orientation during multiple reactivation episodes. Predicting the permeability of a fault zone, including any directional permeability, is key for improved modeling of fluid flow pathways around faults in the subsurface.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"130 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB028763","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Permeability Anisotropy in Brittle Carbonate Fault Rocks\",\"authors\":\"E. A. H. Michie,&nbsp;I. Kaminskaite-Baranauskiene\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JB028763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Permeability anisotropy of fault rocks has been documented in crystalline and clastic lithologies, but rarely within carbonates. In this contribution, we investigate how a permeability anisotropy may develop within carbonate fault rocks, including deformation bands, for the purpose of improving understanding of fluid flow. A total of 43 oriented fault rock samples plugged in three orthogonal directions were taken from eight faults in differing carbonate lithofacies. The permeability was measured, with the goal of assessing if and to what extent a permeability anisotropy may develop. Key factors controlling the formation of anisotropy in these rocks were analyzed by combining petrophysical and microstructural data. All samples showed some degree of anisotropy. However, a consistent major permeability anisotropy (up to five orders of magnitude) only occurred when the same or similar lithofacies were juxtaposed, where the lowest permeability was recorded normal to fault strike in 75% of the samples. Differences occurred in the highest permeability direction dependent on lithofacies. In deformation bands within high porosity grainstones, the highest permeability was inferred to be at a low angle to σ<sub>1,</sub> created by grain and pore alignment in the direction of transport. The highest permeability in faults cutting recrystallized carbonates varied from sub-parallel to σ<sub>1</sub>, to sub-parallel to σ<sub>2</sub>, owing to variations in Riedel shears and fracture orientation during multiple reactivation episodes. Predicting the permeability of a fault zone, including any directional permeability, is key for improved modeling of fluid flow pathways around faults in the subsurface.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"volume\":\"130 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB028763\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB028763\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB028763","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

断层岩的渗透率各向异性已在结晶和碎屑岩性中有记载,但在碳酸盐岩中却很少。在这篇文章中,我们研究了碳酸盐岩断层岩(包括变形带)中渗透率的各向异性是如何发展的,以提高对流体流动的理解。在不同碳酸盐岩岩相的8条断层上,共采集了3个正交方向的43个定向断裂岩样。测量渗透率,目的是评估渗透率的各向异性是否会发展,以及在多大程度上可能发展。结合岩石物理和微观构造资料,分析了控制各向异性形成的关键因素。所有样品均表现出一定程度的各向异性。然而,只有当相同或相似的岩相并放在一起时,才会出现一致的主要渗透率各向异性(高达5个数量级),其中75%的样品中正断层走向的渗透率最低。不同岩相在渗透率最高方向上存在差异。在高孔隙度颗粒岩的变形带中,最大渗透率出现在与σ1的小角度,这是由颗粒与孔隙沿输运方向排列造成的。断裂切割再结晶碳酸盐的最高渗透率在亚平行~ σ1和亚平行~ σ2之间变化,这是由于多次再活化过程中里德尔剪切和裂缝取向的变化所致。预测断层带的渗透率,包括任何方向渗透率,是改进地下断层周围流体流动路径建模的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Permeability Anisotropy in Brittle Carbonate Fault Rocks

Permeability Anisotropy in Brittle Carbonate Fault Rocks

Permeability Anisotropy in Brittle Carbonate Fault Rocks

Permeability Anisotropy in Brittle Carbonate Fault Rocks

Permeability Anisotropy in Brittle Carbonate Fault Rocks

Permeability Anisotropy in Brittle Carbonate Fault Rocks

Permeability anisotropy of fault rocks has been documented in crystalline and clastic lithologies, but rarely within carbonates. In this contribution, we investigate how a permeability anisotropy may develop within carbonate fault rocks, including deformation bands, for the purpose of improving understanding of fluid flow. A total of 43 oriented fault rock samples plugged in three orthogonal directions were taken from eight faults in differing carbonate lithofacies. The permeability was measured, with the goal of assessing if and to what extent a permeability anisotropy may develop. Key factors controlling the formation of anisotropy in these rocks were analyzed by combining petrophysical and microstructural data. All samples showed some degree of anisotropy. However, a consistent major permeability anisotropy (up to five orders of magnitude) only occurred when the same or similar lithofacies were juxtaposed, where the lowest permeability was recorded normal to fault strike in 75% of the samples. Differences occurred in the highest permeability direction dependent on lithofacies. In deformation bands within high porosity grainstones, the highest permeability was inferred to be at a low angle to σ1, created by grain and pore alignment in the direction of transport. The highest permeability in faults cutting recrystallized carbonates varied from sub-parallel to σ1, to sub-parallel to σ2, owing to variations in Riedel shears and fracture orientation during multiple reactivation episodes. Predicting the permeability of a fault zone, including any directional permeability, is key for improved modeling of fluid flow pathways around faults in the subsurface.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
559
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology. JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields. JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信