改善未来的气候会议

IF 29.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jennifer Hadden, Aseem Prakash
{"title":"改善未来的气候会议","authors":"Jennifer Hadden, Aseem Prakash","doi":"10.1038/s41558-025-02293-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Criticisms of climate policymaking and the Conference of the Parties (COP) process are mounting. In October 2024, Papua New Guinea’s foreign minister announced that the COP meetings were a “total waste of time” and that his government would not be attending<sup>1</sup>. In an open letter, a list of high-profile signatories including former United Nations (UN) Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and former UN climate chief Christiana Figueres called for reforms to the whole framework for UN climate negotiations, with one author stating that “COP is not fit for purpose” and needs foundational reform<sup>2</sup>.</p><p>The COP29 meeting did little to allay these concerns. Some civil society groups boycotted the meeting due to Azerbaijan’s ties to the fossil fuel industry. The talks nearly collapsed, with the Alliance of Small Island States walking out of negotiations for the first time in the 29-year history, citing a “deplorable lack of substance”<sup>3</sup>. The election of Donald Trump cast a shadow on any hope of future US leadership. And after a frustrating and chaotic two weeks in Baku, Azerbaijan, a representative of the Climate Action Network declared the meeting the “worst COP in recent memory” (https://x.com/gcdcj/status/1859908413767209281).</p>","PeriodicalId":18974,"journal":{"name":"Nature Climate Change","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":29.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving future climate meetings\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Hadden, Aseem Prakash\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41558-025-02293-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Criticisms of climate policymaking and the Conference of the Parties (COP) process are mounting. In October 2024, Papua New Guinea’s foreign minister announced that the COP meetings were a “total waste of time” and that his government would not be attending<sup>1</sup>. In an open letter, a list of high-profile signatories including former United Nations (UN) Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and former UN climate chief Christiana Figueres called for reforms to the whole framework for UN climate negotiations, with one author stating that “COP is not fit for purpose” and needs foundational reform<sup>2</sup>.</p><p>The COP29 meeting did little to allay these concerns. Some civil society groups boycotted the meeting due to Azerbaijan’s ties to the fossil fuel industry. The talks nearly collapsed, with the Alliance of Small Island States walking out of negotiations for the first time in the 29-year history, citing a “deplorable lack of substance”<sup>3</sup>. The election of Donald Trump cast a shadow on any hope of future US leadership. And after a frustrating and chaotic two weeks in Baku, Azerbaijan, a representative of the Climate Action Network declared the meeting the “worst COP in recent memory” (https://x.com/gcdcj/status/1859908413767209281).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Climate Change\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":29.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Climate Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02293-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02293-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对气候政策制定和缔约方会议(COP)进程的批评越来越多。2024年10月,巴布亚新几内亚外交部长宣布,缔约方会议“完全是浪费时间”,他的政府将不会参加。在一封公开信中,包括前联合国秘书长潘基文和前联合国气候变化负责人克里斯蒂安娜·菲格雷斯在内的多位知名人士呼吁对联合国气候谈判的整个框架进行改革,其中一位作者指出,“缔约方会议不符合目的”,需要进行根本性的改革。COP29会议并没有减轻这些担忧。由于阿塞拜疆与化石燃料工业的关系,一些民间社会团体抵制了这次会议。谈判几乎破裂,小岛屿国家联盟在29年的历史上首次退出谈判,理由是“令人遗憾的缺乏实质内容”。唐纳德•特朗普(Donald Trump)的当选给美国未来领导地位的希望蒙上了阴影。在阿塞拜疆巴库令人沮丧和混乱的两周后,气候行动网络的一位代表宣布这次会议是“近年来最糟糕的缔约方会议”(https://x.com/gcdcj/status/1859908413767209281)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving future climate meetings

Criticisms of climate policymaking and the Conference of the Parties (COP) process are mounting. In October 2024, Papua New Guinea’s foreign minister announced that the COP meetings were a “total waste of time” and that his government would not be attending1. In an open letter, a list of high-profile signatories including former United Nations (UN) Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and former UN climate chief Christiana Figueres called for reforms to the whole framework for UN climate negotiations, with one author stating that “COP is not fit for purpose” and needs foundational reform2.

The COP29 meeting did little to allay these concerns. Some civil society groups boycotted the meeting due to Azerbaijan’s ties to the fossil fuel industry. The talks nearly collapsed, with the Alliance of Small Island States walking out of negotiations for the first time in the 29-year history, citing a “deplorable lack of substance”3. The election of Donald Trump cast a shadow on any hope of future US leadership. And after a frustrating and chaotic two weeks in Baku, Azerbaijan, a representative of the Climate Action Network declared the meeting the “worst COP in recent memory” (https://x.com/gcdcj/status/1859908413767209281).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Climate Change
Nature Climate Change ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
40.30
自引率
1.60%
发文量
267
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Climate Change is dedicated to addressing the scientific challenge of understanding Earth's changing climate and its societal implications. As a monthly journal, it publishes significant and cutting-edge research on the nature, causes, and impacts of global climate change, as well as its implications for the economy, policy, and the world at large. The journal publishes original research spanning the natural and social sciences, synthesizing interdisciplinary research to provide a comprehensive understanding of climate change. It upholds the high standards set by all Nature-branded journals, ensuring top-tier original research through a fair and rigorous review process, broad readership access, high standards of copy editing and production, rapid publication, and independence from academic societies and other vested interests. Nature Climate Change serves as a platform for discussion among experts, publishing opinion, analysis, and review articles. It also features Research Highlights to highlight important developments in the field and original reporting from renowned science journalists in the form of feature articles. Topics covered in the journal include adaptation, atmospheric science, ecology, economics, energy, impacts and vulnerability, mitigation, oceanography, policy, sociology, and sustainability, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信