探索奥地利体育教育中的社会公正教学法:多元化与公平的教学实践

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Franziska Heidrich, Stefan Meier
{"title":"探索奥地利体育教育中的社会公正教学法:多元化与公平的教学实践","authors":"Franziska Heidrich, Stefan Meier","doi":"10.1177/1356336x251327828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Embracing diversity and the demand for social justice are key concerns in modern societies, and it is imperative for physical education (PE) to address student diversity and promote social justice. However, achieving these goals presents challenges for PE teachers. In this context, social justice pedagogies (SJPs) provide guidance on how to address these demands. Although the concept of SJPs has been extensively theorized, there is a research gap concerning concrete teaching practices related to social justice. Despite a growing literature base, knowledge about specific teaching practices that PE teachers employ in their professional practice remains limited. This study aims to gain a deeper understanding of how SJPs can be realized in PE. Following an exploratory qualitative design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with Austrian secondary school PE teachers ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 20) to explore teaching practices aligned with SJPs. Qualitative content analysis, informed by SJPs, was applied to analyze the data. The results reveal various teaching practices related to SJPs, such as considering student diversity when selecting teaching content, making individualized adjustments, and promoting social skills and fairness. These teaching practices include teaching goals, content, didactic-methodical approaches, teacher–student(s) interactions, and grading. Based on the findings, this paper discusses how these teaching practices reflect the theoretical considerations of SJPs. It concludes that the explored teaching practices demonstrate opportunities for enacting SJPs in PE.","PeriodicalId":47681,"journal":{"name":"European Physical Education Review","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring social justice pedagogies in physical education in Austria: Teaching practices for diversity and equity\",\"authors\":\"Franziska Heidrich, Stefan Meier\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1356336x251327828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Embracing diversity and the demand for social justice are key concerns in modern societies, and it is imperative for physical education (PE) to address student diversity and promote social justice. However, achieving these goals presents challenges for PE teachers. In this context, social justice pedagogies (SJPs) provide guidance on how to address these demands. Although the concept of SJPs has been extensively theorized, there is a research gap concerning concrete teaching practices related to social justice. Despite a growing literature base, knowledge about specific teaching practices that PE teachers employ in their professional practice remains limited. This study aims to gain a deeper understanding of how SJPs can be realized in PE. Following an exploratory qualitative design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with Austrian secondary school PE teachers ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 20) to explore teaching practices aligned with SJPs. Qualitative content analysis, informed by SJPs, was applied to analyze the data. The results reveal various teaching practices related to SJPs, such as considering student diversity when selecting teaching content, making individualized adjustments, and promoting social skills and fairness. These teaching practices include teaching goals, content, didactic-methodical approaches, teacher–student(s) interactions, and grading. Based on the findings, this paper discusses how these teaching practices reflect the theoretical considerations of SJPs. It concludes that the explored teaching practices demonstrate opportunities for enacting SJPs in PE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Physical Education Review\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Physical Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x251327828\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Physical Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x251327828","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

拥抱多样性和对社会正义的需求是现代社会的关键问题,体育教育必须解决学生多样性和促进社会正义。然而,实现这些目标给体育教师带来了挑战。在这种背景下,社会正义教学法(sps)为如何满足这些需求提供了指导。虽然社会公正的概念已经被广泛地理论化,但在与社会公正相关的具体教学实践方面还存在研究空白。尽管文献基础越来越多,但关于体育教师在其专业实践中采用的具体教学实践的知识仍然有限。本研究旨在更深入地了解体育教学中如何实现spps。在探索性质的设计之后,对奥地利中学体育教师进行了半结构化访谈(n = 20),以探索与sjp相一致的教学实践。在sps的指导下,采用定性内容分析对数据进行分析。结果揭示了与sps相关的各种教学实践,例如在选择教学内容时考虑学生的多样性,进行个性化调整,以及促进社交技能和公平。这些教学实践包括教学目标、教学内容、教学方法、师生互动和评分。在此基础上,本文探讨了这些教学实践如何反映了sbp的理论思考。本文的结论是,探索的教学实践为在体育教学中实施sbp提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring social justice pedagogies in physical education in Austria: Teaching practices for diversity and equity
Embracing diversity and the demand for social justice are key concerns in modern societies, and it is imperative for physical education (PE) to address student diversity and promote social justice. However, achieving these goals presents challenges for PE teachers. In this context, social justice pedagogies (SJPs) provide guidance on how to address these demands. Although the concept of SJPs has been extensively theorized, there is a research gap concerning concrete teaching practices related to social justice. Despite a growing literature base, knowledge about specific teaching practices that PE teachers employ in their professional practice remains limited. This study aims to gain a deeper understanding of how SJPs can be realized in PE. Following an exploratory qualitative design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with Austrian secondary school PE teachers ( n = 20) to explore teaching practices aligned with SJPs. Qualitative content analysis, informed by SJPs, was applied to analyze the data. The results reveal various teaching practices related to SJPs, such as considering student diversity when selecting teaching content, making individualized adjustments, and promoting social skills and fairness. These teaching practices include teaching goals, content, didactic-methodical approaches, teacher–student(s) interactions, and grading. Based on the findings, this paper discusses how these teaching practices reflect the theoretical considerations of SJPs. It concludes that the explored teaching practices demonstrate opportunities for enacting SJPs in PE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Physical Education Review
European Physical Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: - Multidisciplinary Approaches: European Physical Education Review brings together contributions from a wide range of disciplines across the natural and social sciences and humanities. It includes theoretical and research-based articles and occasionally devotes Special Issues to major topics and themes within the field. - International Coverage: European Physical Education Review publishes contributions from Europe and all regions of the world, promoting international communication among scholars and professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信