在围介入期牙科和医疗程序中使用的非语言交流范围审查规程。

HRB open research Pub Date : 2025-03-03 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.13373.2
Paul O'Dwyer, Viveka Guzman, Emma Wallace, Frank Doyle
{"title":"在围介入期牙科和医疗程序中使用的非语言交流范围审查规程。","authors":"Paul O'Dwyer, Viveka Guzman, Emma Wallace, Frank Doyle","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13373.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dental operative procedures, by their interventive nature, impede the opportunity for peri-intervention verbal communication between patients and clinicians. This can impair trust, consent, and shared decision making with the potential of adversely affecting patient dignity, and potentially resulting in suboptimal clinical outcomes.This scoping review aims to interrogate the literature concerning non-verbal communication methods used in dental and medical practices during peri-interventive procedures, in aiding communication between clinician and patient. We will also ascertain how these align with the Limited Capacity Model of Motivated Mediated Message Processing (LC4MP) communication theory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The framework proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for scoping reviews, will be used to guide this scoping review and reporting methodology. Selected electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus), PsychInfo, CINAHL and grey literature sources will be searched.Inclusion criteria are: articles written in the English language, publications between 2000 and 2025, peer-reviewed empirical studies, with either qualitative or quantitative data, mixed methods, reviews, book chapters and grey literature with a principal focus on non-verbal communication in the healthcare setting.A narrative synthesis will be conducted, with results reported according to elements of LCM4P theory: cognitive load, motivated messaging, message processing and memory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review will contribute to our methodological and theoretical understanding of the use of non-verbal communication strategies in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"5 ","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review protocol of non-verbal communication utilised in peri-interventive dental and medical procedures.\",\"authors\":\"Paul O'Dwyer, Viveka Guzman, Emma Wallace, Frank Doyle\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/hrbopenres.13373.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dental operative procedures, by their interventive nature, impede the opportunity for peri-intervention verbal communication between patients and clinicians. This can impair trust, consent, and shared decision making with the potential of adversely affecting patient dignity, and potentially resulting in suboptimal clinical outcomes.This scoping review aims to interrogate the literature concerning non-verbal communication methods used in dental and medical practices during peri-interventive procedures, in aiding communication between clinician and patient. We will also ascertain how these align with the Limited Capacity Model of Motivated Mediated Message Processing (LC4MP) communication theory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The framework proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for scoping reviews, will be used to guide this scoping review and reporting methodology. Selected electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus), PsychInfo, CINAHL and grey literature sources will be searched.Inclusion criteria are: articles written in the English language, publications between 2000 and 2025, peer-reviewed empirical studies, with either qualitative or quantitative data, mixed methods, reviews, book chapters and grey literature with a principal focus on non-verbal communication in the healthcare setting.A narrative synthesis will be conducted, with results reported according to elements of LCM4P theory: cognitive load, motivated messaging, message processing and memory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review will contribute to our methodological and theoretical understanding of the use of non-verbal communication strategies in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HRB open research\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HRB open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13373.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13373.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:牙科手术过程,由于其介入的性质,阻碍了患者和临床医生之间的围手术期口头交流的机会。这可能会损害信任、同意和共同决策,从而可能对患者尊严产生不利影响,并可能导致不理想的临床结果。本综述的目的是询问有关非语言沟通方法在围介入手术期间用于牙科和医疗实践的文献,以帮助临床医生和患者之间的沟通。我们还将确定这些如何与激励介导消息处理(LC4MP)通信理论的有限容量模型相一致。方法:采用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所提出的框架,以及系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的元分析扩展,来指导范围评价和报告方法。检索选定的电子数据库(Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library和Scopus), PsychInfo, CINAHL和灰色文献来源。纳入标准是:用英语撰写的文章,2000年至2025年之间的出版物,同行评议的实证研究,包括定性或定量数据,混合方法,评论,书籍章节和灰色文献,主要关注医疗保健环境中的非语言交流。将进行叙事综合,并根据LCM4P理论的要素:认知负荷、动机信息传递、信息处理和记忆报告结果。结论:这一范围综述将有助于我们在临床环境中使用非语言交际策略的方法学和理论理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A scoping review protocol of non-verbal communication utilised in peri-interventive dental and medical procedures.

Introduction: Dental operative procedures, by their interventive nature, impede the opportunity for peri-intervention verbal communication between patients and clinicians. This can impair trust, consent, and shared decision making with the potential of adversely affecting patient dignity, and potentially resulting in suboptimal clinical outcomes.This scoping review aims to interrogate the literature concerning non-verbal communication methods used in dental and medical practices during peri-interventive procedures, in aiding communication between clinician and patient. We will also ascertain how these align with the Limited Capacity Model of Motivated Mediated Message Processing (LC4MP) communication theory.

Methods: The framework proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for scoping reviews, will be used to guide this scoping review and reporting methodology. Selected electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus), PsychInfo, CINAHL and grey literature sources will be searched.Inclusion criteria are: articles written in the English language, publications between 2000 and 2025, peer-reviewed empirical studies, with either qualitative or quantitative data, mixed methods, reviews, book chapters and grey literature with a principal focus on non-verbal communication in the healthcare setting.A narrative synthesis will be conducted, with results reported according to elements of LCM4P theory: cognitive load, motivated messaging, message processing and memory.

Conclusion: This scoping review will contribute to our methodological and theoretical understanding of the use of non-verbal communication strategies in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信