IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Yao Yao, Mengjie He, Fei Chen, Jiaqiang Zhu
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis of Second Language Phonetic Training: Exploring Overall Effect and Moderating Factors.","authors":"Yao Yao, Mengjie He, Fei Chen, Jiaqiang Zhu","doi":"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Phonetic training has been found to be an effective way on second language (L2) learning, but the evidence is not conclusive regarding the effectiveness of different instructional approaches and possible interactions between language learners, training features, and outcome measures. This study aims to meta-analyze existing studies to provide an accurate estimate of the overall effect and investigate factors that may moderate its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic search in major databases, identified seven potential moderators, and conducted a random-effects model meta-analysis for each variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comprehensive literature search yielded 65 primary studies that involved 2,793 L2 learners, generating 223 effect sizes for between-groups contrasts. Results showed that phonetic training had a large positive effect on the enhancement of L2 phonetic competence, <i>d</i> = 0.762. Subsequent moderator analyses revealed that perceptual training showed a larger mean effect size compared to production training and combined training; phonetic training at the high school level exhibited the largest mean effect size among all educational levels; phonetic training, either perceptual training or production training, had a greater impact on improving learners' perception competence than production competence; and outcome measured by identification tasks generated the largest effect, followed by the combination of discrimination and identification tasks, subjective perception judgment, and discrimination tasks, while objective acoustic measurement yielded the smallest effect size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study provided a quantitative synthesis of studies investigating the efficacy of L2 phonetic training and examined various moderating variables, which indicated the heterogeneity and limitations of research on this topic. The results highlighted the need for further investigation of the potential factors of L2 phonetic training and the relationship between perception and production.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"1784-1802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00432","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:语音训练被认为是第二语言(L2)学习的一种有效方法,但关于不同教学方法的有效性以及语言学习者、训练特点和结果测量之间可能存在的相互作用,目前尚无定论。本研究旨在对现有研究进行元分析,以提供对总体效果的准确估计,并调查可能影响其效果的因素:我们在主要数据库中进行了系统检索,确定了七个潜在的调节因素,并对每个变量进行了随机效应模型元分析:通过全面的文献检索,我们获得了 65 项主要研究,涉及 2,793 名 L2 学习者,产生了 223 个组间对比效应大小。结果显示,语音训练对提高 L2 语音能力有很大的积极作用,d = 0.762。随后的调节因子分析显示,与发音训练和综合训练相比,感知训练的平均效应大小更大;在所有教育水平中,高中阶段的语音训练的平均效应大小最大;语音训练,无论是感知训练还是发音训练,对提高学习者的感知能力的影响都大于发音能力;通过辨别任务测量的结果产生的效应最大,其次是辨别和识别任务的组合、主观感知判断和辨别任务,而客观声学测量产生的效应最小:我们的研究对有关 L2 语音训练效果的研究进行了定量综述,并考察了各种调节变量,这表明了该主题研究的异质性和局限性。研究结果表明,有必要进一步研究第二语言语音训练的潜在因素以及感知与发音之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Meta-Analysis of Second Language Phonetic Training: Exploring Overall Effect and Moderating Factors.

Purpose: Phonetic training has been found to be an effective way on second language (L2) learning, but the evidence is not conclusive regarding the effectiveness of different instructional approaches and possible interactions between language learners, training features, and outcome measures. This study aims to meta-analyze existing studies to provide an accurate estimate of the overall effect and investigate factors that may moderate its effectiveness.

Method: We conducted a systematic search in major databases, identified seven potential moderators, and conducted a random-effects model meta-analysis for each variable.

Results: A comprehensive literature search yielded 65 primary studies that involved 2,793 L2 learners, generating 223 effect sizes for between-groups contrasts. Results showed that phonetic training had a large positive effect on the enhancement of L2 phonetic competence, d = 0.762. Subsequent moderator analyses revealed that perceptual training showed a larger mean effect size compared to production training and combined training; phonetic training at the high school level exhibited the largest mean effect size among all educational levels; phonetic training, either perceptual training or production training, had a greater impact on improving learners' perception competence than production competence; and outcome measured by identification tasks generated the largest effect, followed by the combination of discrimination and identification tasks, subjective perception judgment, and discrimination tasks, while objective acoustic measurement yielded the smallest effect size.

Conclusions: Our study provided a quantitative synthesis of studies investigating the efficacy of L2 phonetic training and examined various moderating variables, which indicated the heterogeneity and limitations of research on this topic. The results highlighted the need for further investigation of the potential factors of L2 phonetic training and the relationship between perception and production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信