髋部骨折患者的医院转院与较高的费用和死亡率相关。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Kate Hutchison, Genevieve Rollier, Hsin-Fang Li, Erica Wells, Kimberly Workman, Paul J Duwelius, Elizabeth G Lieberman
{"title":"髋部骨折患者的医院转院与较高的费用和死亡率相关。","authors":"Kate Hutchison, Genevieve Rollier, Hsin-Fang Li, Erica Wells, Kimberly Workman, Paul J Duwelius, Elizabeth G Lieberman","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transferring hip fracture patients may increase morbidity and cost. The purpose of this study was to examine time to surgery, outcomes, and cost in patients undergoing operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures (DFNF), comparing those admitted through the emergency department (ED) and those transferred from outside hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of surgically managed DFNF patients (age ≥ 65 years) at a single institution between May 29, 2020, and December 29, 2022, was performed. Patients were categorized into two groups: \"ED arrivals\" and \"transfers.\" Demographics, time from presentation to surgery, hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, 1-year readmission, reoperation, and mortality, and total cost of care were collected and compared. We identified 459 patients (ED = 422, 92.0%, Transfer = 37, 8.0%). There was no difference in age, sex, body mass index (BMI), or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median time from ED to operating room was higher in the transfer group (41.6 versus 23.2 hours, P < 0.0001). Transfer and ED patients had similar LOS (5.9 versus 6.0 days, P = 0.29) and similar rates of discharge to skilled nursing facility (66.1 versus 62.2%, P = 0.39). There was a higher rate of 1-year mortality (27.0 versus 13.5% for ED, P = 0.03) in transfer patients but no difference in 1-year readmission or reoperation. Adjusting for demographics, transfer patients had 2.6 higher odds of 1-year mortality than ED patients (OR [odds ratio] = 2.59 (1.13 to 5.94) P = 0.03). The cost of care was higher for transfer patients ($23,521 versus $13,980, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transferring DFNF patients was associated with delayed time to surgery, increased 1-year mortality, and higher costs. Transferring patients is a logistical reality for many conditions; however, efforts should be made to provide efficient, safe, and cost-effective care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital Transfers for Hip Fracture Patients Are Associated with Higher Cost and Mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Kate Hutchison, Genevieve Rollier, Hsin-Fang Li, Erica Wells, Kimberly Workman, Paul J Duwelius, Elizabeth G Lieberman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transferring hip fracture patients may increase morbidity and cost. The purpose of this study was to examine time to surgery, outcomes, and cost in patients undergoing operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures (DFNF), comparing those admitted through the emergency department (ED) and those transferred from outside hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of surgically managed DFNF patients (age ≥ 65 years) at a single institution between May 29, 2020, and December 29, 2022, was performed. Patients were categorized into two groups: \\\"ED arrivals\\\" and \\\"transfers.\\\" Demographics, time from presentation to surgery, hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, 1-year readmission, reoperation, and mortality, and total cost of care were collected and compared. We identified 459 patients (ED = 422, 92.0%, Transfer = 37, 8.0%). There was no difference in age, sex, body mass index (BMI), or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median time from ED to operating room was higher in the transfer group (41.6 versus 23.2 hours, P < 0.0001). Transfer and ED patients had similar LOS (5.9 versus 6.0 days, P = 0.29) and similar rates of discharge to skilled nursing facility (66.1 versus 62.2%, P = 0.39). There was a higher rate of 1-year mortality (27.0 versus 13.5% for ED, P = 0.03) in transfer patients but no difference in 1-year readmission or reoperation. Adjusting for demographics, transfer patients had 2.6 higher odds of 1-year mortality than ED patients (OR [odds ratio] = 2.59 (1.13 to 5.94) P = 0.03). The cost of care was higher for transfer patients ($23,521 versus $13,980, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transferring DFNF patients was associated with delayed time to surgery, increased 1-year mortality, and higher costs. Transferring patients is a logistical reality for many conditions; however, efforts should be made to provide efficient, safe, and cost-effective care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.035\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:髋部骨折患者的转移可能增加发病率和费用。本研究的目的是检查移位性股骨颈骨折(DFNF)患者接受手术治疗的手术时间、结果和费用,比较通过急诊科(ED)入院的患者和从外部医院转院的患者。方法:对2020年5月29日至2022年12月29日在单一机构接受手术治疗的DFNF患者(年龄≥65岁)进行回顾性分析。病人被分为两组:“急诊科到达”和“转院”。统计数据、从就诊到手术的时间、住院时间(LOS)、出院处理、1年再入院、再手术、死亡率和总护理费用被收集和比较。共纳入459例患者(ED = 422, 92.0%, Transfer = 37, 8.0%)。年龄、性别、身体质量指数(BMI)和美国麻醉师协会(ASA)的地位没有差异。结果:转移组从急诊科到手术室的中位时间更长(41.6小时比23.2小时,P < 0.0001)。转院患者和急诊科患者的LOS相似(5.9天和6.0天,P = 0.29),出院率相似(66.1天和62.2%,P = 0.39)。转院患者的1年死亡率更高(27.0 vs 13.5%, P = 0.03),但1年再入院或再手术无差异。经人口统计学调整后,转院患者的1年死亡率比急诊科患者高2.6 (OR[比值比]= 2.59 (1.13 ~ 5.94)P = 0.03)。转院患者的护理费用较高(23,521美元对13,980美元,P < 0.0001)。结论:转移DFNF患者与延迟手术时间、增加的1年死亡率和更高的费用相关。在许多情况下,转移病人是一个后勤现实;然而,应努力提供有效、安全和具有成本效益的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hospital Transfers for Hip Fracture Patients Are Associated with Higher Cost and Mortality.

Background: Transferring hip fracture patients may increase morbidity and cost. The purpose of this study was to examine time to surgery, outcomes, and cost in patients undergoing operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures (DFNF), comparing those admitted through the emergency department (ED) and those transferred from outside hospitals.

Methods: A retrospective review of surgically managed DFNF patients (age ≥ 65 years) at a single institution between May 29, 2020, and December 29, 2022, was performed. Patients were categorized into two groups: "ED arrivals" and "transfers." Demographics, time from presentation to surgery, hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, 1-year readmission, reoperation, and mortality, and total cost of care were collected and compared. We identified 459 patients (ED = 422, 92.0%, Transfer = 37, 8.0%). There was no difference in age, sex, body mass index (BMI), or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status.

Results: Median time from ED to operating room was higher in the transfer group (41.6 versus 23.2 hours, P < 0.0001). Transfer and ED patients had similar LOS (5.9 versus 6.0 days, P = 0.29) and similar rates of discharge to skilled nursing facility (66.1 versus 62.2%, P = 0.39). There was a higher rate of 1-year mortality (27.0 versus 13.5% for ED, P = 0.03) in transfer patients but no difference in 1-year readmission or reoperation. Adjusting for demographics, transfer patients had 2.6 higher odds of 1-year mortality than ED patients (OR [odds ratio] = 2.59 (1.13 to 5.94) P = 0.03). The cost of care was higher for transfer patients ($23,521 versus $13,980, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Transferring DFNF patients was associated with delayed time to surgery, increased 1-year mortality, and higher costs. Transferring patients is a logistical reality for many conditions; however, efforts should be made to provide efficient, safe, and cost-effective care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信