Hanjoo R. Lee , Rebecca M. Jones , Phillip G. Durham , Virginie Papadopoulou , Gianmarco F. Pinton , Paul A. Dayton
{"title":"经颅超声超分辨率成像中血脑屏障破坏的可能性。","authors":"Hanjoo R. Lee , Rebecca M. Jones , Phillip G. Durham , Virginie Papadopoulou , Gianmarco F. Pinton , Paul A. Dayton","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Super-resolution (SR) ultrasound imaging dramatically improves the resolution of microvascular images beyond the diffraction limit. It is well-established that ultrasound with contrast agents, such as those used in SR, can open the blood–brain barrier (BBB) under certain conditions. This study aimed to quantify potential BBB disruption (BBBD) during 3-D transcranial ultrasound SR as a function of mechanical index (MI) and pressure distribution. Mice were imaged using conventional 3-D SR sequences. BBBD was quantified through fluorescence imaging of dye extravasation for mechanical indices in the range of 0–0.78 (measured in water). The results suggest that when 3-D SR images are acquired at 0.78 MI, BBBD occurs; however, imaging was achievable without significant dye extravasation below 0.78. In addition, hydrophone measurements and 3-D simulations were performed to estimate local pressure distributions in the brain. For a transducer surface MI of 0.64, estimates of the local MI within the brain averaged 0.18 ± 0.09, ranging from 0.03 to 0.44, with no significant BBBD observed. However, for a transducer surface MI of 0.78, significant BBBD was observed (<em>p</em> < 0.05), where the values in the brain range from 0.04 to 0.53, averaging 0.22 ± 0.11. This suggests that the local MI that generates BBB bio-effects is within the range of 0.44–0.53 MI. For the 0.78 MI case, 4.8% of the total brain volume had a pressure above 0.44 MI according to hydrophone measurements (4.8 mm<sup>2</sup> of the 100 mm<sup>2</sup> 2-D plane scanned) and 11.10% according to simulations (74.6 mm<sup>3</sup> of the 777.5 mm<sup>3</sup> volume).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"51 6","pages":"Pages 961-968"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Potential for Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption During Transcranial Ultrasound Super-Resolution Imaging\",\"authors\":\"Hanjoo R. Lee , Rebecca M. Jones , Phillip G. Durham , Virginie Papadopoulou , Gianmarco F. Pinton , Paul A. Dayton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.02.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Super-resolution (SR) ultrasound imaging dramatically improves the resolution of microvascular images beyond the diffraction limit. It is well-established that ultrasound with contrast agents, such as those used in SR, can open the blood–brain barrier (BBB) under certain conditions. This study aimed to quantify potential BBB disruption (BBBD) during 3-D transcranial ultrasound SR as a function of mechanical index (MI) and pressure distribution. Mice were imaged using conventional 3-D SR sequences. BBBD was quantified through fluorescence imaging of dye extravasation for mechanical indices in the range of 0–0.78 (measured in water). The results suggest that when 3-D SR images are acquired at 0.78 MI, BBBD occurs; however, imaging was achievable without significant dye extravasation below 0.78. In addition, hydrophone measurements and 3-D simulations were performed to estimate local pressure distributions in the brain. For a transducer surface MI of 0.64, estimates of the local MI within the brain averaged 0.18 ± 0.09, ranging from 0.03 to 0.44, with no significant BBBD observed. However, for a transducer surface MI of 0.78, significant BBBD was observed (<em>p</em> < 0.05), where the values in the brain range from 0.04 to 0.53, averaging 0.22 ± 0.11. This suggests that the local MI that generates BBB bio-effects is within the range of 0.44–0.53 MI. For the 0.78 MI case, 4.8% of the total brain volume had a pressure above 0.44 MI according to hydrophone measurements (4.8 mm<sup>2</sup> of the 100 mm<sup>2</sup> 2-D plane scanned) and 11.10% according to simulations (74.6 mm<sup>3</sup> of the 777.5 mm<sup>3</sup> volume).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"51 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 961-968\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562925000560\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562925000560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Potential for Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption During Transcranial Ultrasound Super-Resolution Imaging
Super-resolution (SR) ultrasound imaging dramatically improves the resolution of microvascular images beyond the diffraction limit. It is well-established that ultrasound with contrast agents, such as those used in SR, can open the blood–brain barrier (BBB) under certain conditions. This study aimed to quantify potential BBB disruption (BBBD) during 3-D transcranial ultrasound SR as a function of mechanical index (MI) and pressure distribution. Mice were imaged using conventional 3-D SR sequences. BBBD was quantified through fluorescence imaging of dye extravasation for mechanical indices in the range of 0–0.78 (measured in water). The results suggest that when 3-D SR images are acquired at 0.78 MI, BBBD occurs; however, imaging was achievable without significant dye extravasation below 0.78. In addition, hydrophone measurements and 3-D simulations were performed to estimate local pressure distributions in the brain. For a transducer surface MI of 0.64, estimates of the local MI within the brain averaged 0.18 ± 0.09, ranging from 0.03 to 0.44, with no significant BBBD observed. However, for a transducer surface MI of 0.78, significant BBBD was observed (p < 0.05), where the values in the brain range from 0.04 to 0.53, averaging 0.22 ± 0.11. This suggests that the local MI that generates BBB bio-effects is within the range of 0.44–0.53 MI. For the 0.78 MI case, 4.8% of the total brain volume had a pressure above 0.44 MI according to hydrophone measurements (4.8 mm2 of the 100 mm2 2-D plane scanned) and 11.10% according to simulations (74.6 mm3 of the 777.5 mm3 volume).
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.